抗癫痫药物在创伤后癫痫发作中的应用:一项全球调查。

IF 1.8 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Annals of Neurosciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/09727531221120765
Harison Gopalan, Krishnakumar P, Arun S
{"title":"抗癫痫药物在创伤后癫痫发作中的应用:一项全球调查。","authors":"Harison Gopalan,&nbsp;Krishnakumar P,&nbsp;Arun S","doi":"10.1177/09727531221120765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Post traumatic seizures (PTS) and post traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are potential consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is no consensus regarding its management among treating doctors. Purpose We have undertaken a global survey to assess the variability of management practices of PTS and PTE and highlight the pressing need to formulate uniform practice guidelines. Methods A questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions were developed with the help of Google survey and sent through e-mail, or social media platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook messenger or Telegram, to practicing Neurologists and Neurosurgeons round the world. Results There were a total of 220 responses. Majority of our responders (n = 202; 91.8%) would start an anti-epileptic (AED) prophylaxis to prevent PTS; 18 people (8.18%) told that they would not start AED prophylaxis for TBI. Phenytoin (n = 98; 48.5%) followed by Levetiracetam (n = 78; 38.6%) was the preferred drug, although the latter was significantly preferred by high and upper middle-income countries (p<.001). Majority (n = 99; 49%) would not use it beyond two weeks. Most clinicians would manage PTE with a single drug (n = 160; 72.7%) either Phenytoin (n = 69; 31.3%) or levetiracetam (n = 67; 30.4%). Most of them (n = 174; 86%) would treat for less than one year. Conclusions Practices in the management of PTS and PTE vary widely among clinicians. Our study point towards the need for the development of a more robust and comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of the same.","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/c1/10.1177_09727531221120765.PMC10259155.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Anti-epileptic Drugs for Post Traumatic Seizure: A Global Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Harison Gopalan,&nbsp;Krishnakumar P,&nbsp;Arun S\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09727531221120765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Post traumatic seizures (PTS) and post traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are potential consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is no consensus regarding its management among treating doctors. Purpose We have undertaken a global survey to assess the variability of management practices of PTS and PTE and highlight the pressing need to formulate uniform practice guidelines. Methods A questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions were developed with the help of Google survey and sent through e-mail, or social media platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook messenger or Telegram, to practicing Neurologists and Neurosurgeons round the world. Results There were a total of 220 responses. Majority of our responders (n = 202; 91.8%) would start an anti-epileptic (AED) prophylaxis to prevent PTS; 18 people (8.18%) told that they would not start AED prophylaxis for TBI. Phenytoin (n = 98; 48.5%) followed by Levetiracetam (n = 78; 38.6%) was the preferred drug, although the latter was significantly preferred by high and upper middle-income countries (p<.001). Majority (n = 99; 49%) would not use it beyond two weeks. Most clinicians would manage PTE with a single drug (n = 160; 72.7%) either Phenytoin (n = 69; 31.3%) or levetiracetam (n = 67; 30.4%). Most of them (n = 174; 86%) would treat for less than one year. Conclusions Practices in the management of PTS and PTE vary widely among clinicians. Our study point towards the need for the development of a more robust and comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of the same.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"26-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/c1/10.1177_09727531221120765.PMC10259155.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531221120765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531221120765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤后癫痫发作(PTS)和创伤后癫痫(PTE)是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的潜在后果。治疗医生对其管理没有共识。目的:我们进行了一项全球调查,以评估PTS和PTE管理实践的可变性,并强调制定统一实践指南的迫切需要。方法:在谷歌调查的帮助下,开发了一份由16个问题组成的问卷,并通过电子邮件或WhatsApp, Facebook messenger或Telegram等社交媒体平台发送给世界各地的执业神经科医生和神经外科医生。结果:共收到220份问卷。大多数应答者(n = 202;91.8%)会开始抗癫痫(AED)预防PTS;18人(8.18%)表示他们不会因TBI而开始AED预防。苯妥英(n = 98;48.5%),其次是左乙拉西坦(n = 78;38.6%)是首选药物,尽管后者在高收入和中高收入国家明显更受欢迎(p001)。多数(n = 99;49%)不会使用超过两周。大多数临床医生会用单一药物治疗PTE (n = 160;72.7%)或苯妥英(n = 69;31.3%)或左乙拉西坦(n = 67;30.4%)。大多数(n = 174;86%)愿意接受不到一年的治疗。结论:临床医生对PTS和PTE的治疗方法差异很大。我们的研究指向需要制定一套更为健全和全面的管理实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Anti-epileptic Drugs for Post Traumatic Seizure: A Global Survey.
Background Post traumatic seizures (PTS) and post traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are potential consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is no consensus regarding its management among treating doctors. Purpose We have undertaken a global survey to assess the variability of management practices of PTS and PTE and highlight the pressing need to formulate uniform practice guidelines. Methods A questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions were developed with the help of Google survey and sent through e-mail, or social media platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook messenger or Telegram, to practicing Neurologists and Neurosurgeons round the world. Results There were a total of 220 responses. Majority of our responders (n = 202; 91.8%) would start an anti-epileptic (AED) prophylaxis to prevent PTS; 18 people (8.18%) told that they would not start AED prophylaxis for TBI. Phenytoin (n = 98; 48.5%) followed by Levetiracetam (n = 78; 38.6%) was the preferred drug, although the latter was significantly preferred by high and upper middle-income countries (p<.001). Majority (n = 99; 49%) would not use it beyond two weeks. Most clinicians would manage PTE with a single drug (n = 160; 72.7%) either Phenytoin (n = 69; 31.3%) or levetiracetam (n = 67; 30.4%). Most of them (n = 174; 86%) would treat for less than one year. Conclusions Practices in the management of PTS and PTE vary widely among clinicians. Our study point towards the need for the development of a more robust and comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of the same.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Content Validity of Teacher's Evaluation of Neurodevelopmental Delays (TEDD) Tool for Indian Preschoolers. Understanding the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Study on Offenders. Spectrum of Neuroimmunological Manifestations of Dengue Fever. Why Your Brain Needs a Walk in the Park: Residential Greenspaces as the Next Frontier in Brain Research and Treatment. Omicron-COVID-19-Related Knowledge in Parkinson's Disease Patients and Their Caregivers: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1