Sex-based differences in risk factors for incident myocardial infarction and stroke in the UK Biobank.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad029
Elizabeth Remfry, Maddalena Ardissino, Celeste McCracken, Liliana Szabo, Stefan Neubauer, Nicholas C Harvey, Mamas A Mamas, John Robson, Steffen E Petersen, Zahra Raisi-Estabragh
{"title":"Sex-based differences in risk factors for incident myocardial infarction and stroke in the UK Biobank.","authors":"Elizabeth Remfry, Maddalena Ardissino, Celeste McCracken, Liliana Szabo, Stefan Neubauer, Nicholas C Harvey, Mamas A Mamas, John Robson, Steffen E Petersen, Zahra Raisi-Estabragh","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examined sex-based differences in associations of vascular risk factors with incident cardiovascular events in the UK Biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline participant demographic, clinical, laboratory, anthropometric, and imaging characteristics were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate independent associations of vascular risk factors with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke for men and women. Women-to-men ratios of hazard ratios (RHRs), and related 95% confidence intervals, represent the relative effect-size magnitude by sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 363 313 participants (53.5% women), 8470 experienced MI (29.9% women) and 7705 experienced stroke (40.1% women) over 12.66 [11.93, 13.38] years of prospective follow-up. Men had greater risk factor burden and higher arterial stiffness index at baseline. Women had greater age-related decline in aortic distensibility. Older age [RHR: 1.02 (1.01-1.03)], greater deprivation [RHR: 1.02 (1.00-1.03)], hypertension [RHR: 1.14 (1.02-1.27)], and current smoking [RHR: 1.45 (1.27-1.66)] were associated with a greater excess risk of MI in women than men. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with excess MI risk in men [RHR: 0.90 (0.84-0.95)] and apolipoprotein A (ApoA) was less protective for MI in women [RHR: 1.65 (1.01-2.71)]. Older age was associated with excess risk of stroke [RHR: 1.01 (1.00-1.02)] and ApoA was less protective for stroke in women [RHR: 2.55 (1.58-4.14)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older age, hypertension, and smoking appeared stronger drivers of cardiovascular disease in women, whereas lipid metrics appeared stronger risk determinants for men. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific preventive strategies and suggest priority targets for intervention in men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study examined sex-based differences in associations of vascular risk factors with incident cardiovascular events in the UK Biobank.

Methods: Baseline participant demographic, clinical, laboratory, anthropometric, and imaging characteristics were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate independent associations of vascular risk factors with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke for men and women. Women-to-men ratios of hazard ratios (RHRs), and related 95% confidence intervals, represent the relative effect-size magnitude by sex.

Results: Among the 363 313 participants (53.5% women), 8470 experienced MI (29.9% women) and 7705 experienced stroke (40.1% women) over 12.66 [11.93, 13.38] years of prospective follow-up. Men had greater risk factor burden and higher arterial stiffness index at baseline. Women had greater age-related decline in aortic distensibility. Older age [RHR: 1.02 (1.01-1.03)], greater deprivation [RHR: 1.02 (1.00-1.03)], hypertension [RHR: 1.14 (1.02-1.27)], and current smoking [RHR: 1.45 (1.27-1.66)] were associated with a greater excess risk of MI in women than men. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with excess MI risk in men [RHR: 0.90 (0.84-0.95)] and apolipoprotein A (ApoA) was less protective for MI in women [RHR: 1.65 (1.01-2.71)]. Older age was associated with excess risk of stroke [RHR: 1.01 (1.00-1.02)] and ApoA was less protective for stroke in women [RHR: 2.55 (1.58-4.14)].

Conclusion: Older age, hypertension, and smoking appeared stronger drivers of cardiovascular disease in women, whereas lipid metrics appeared stronger risk determinants for men. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific preventive strategies and suggest priority targets for intervention in men and women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国生物库中心肌梗死和中风发病风险因素的性别差异。
目的:本研究探讨了英国生物库中血管风险因素与心血管事件相关性的性别差异:收集了参与者的人口统计学、临床、实验室、人体测量和影像学特征。采用多变量 Cox 回归估算男性和女性血管风险因素与心肌梗死(MI)和缺血性中风事件的独立关联。女性与男性的危险比(RHRs)以及相关的95%置信区间代表了不同性别的相对效应大小:在 363 313 名参与者(53.5% 为女性)中,有 8470 人在 12.66 [11.93, 13.38] 年的前瞻性随访中经历过心肌梗死(29.9% 为女性),7705 人经历过中风(40.1% 为女性)。男性的风险因素负担更大,基线动脉僵化指数更高。女性的主动脉扩张性随年龄增长而下降的幅度更大。与男性相比,女性年龄更大[RHR:1.02 (1.01-1.03)]、更贫困[RHR:1.02 (1.00-1.03)]、高血压[RHR:1.14 (1.02-1.27)]和目前吸烟[RHR:1.45 (1.27-1.66)]与心肌梗死的超额风险相关。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与男性心肌梗死风险过高有关[RHR:0.90 (0.84-0.95)],而载脂蛋白 A(ApoA)对女性心肌梗死的保护作用较弱[RHR:1.65 (1.01-2.71)]。年龄越大,中风风险越高[RHR:1.01 (1.00-1.02)],载脂蛋白 A 对女性中风的保护作用越小[RHR:2.55 (1.58-4.14)]:结论:高龄、高血压和吸烟对女性心血管疾病的影响更大,而血脂指标对男性的风险决定因素更大。这些发现强调了针对不同性别的预防策略的重要性,并提出了男性和女性的优先干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE. Trends and risk factors analysis of aortic aneurysm mortality in China over thirty years: based on the global burden of disease 2019 data. Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Regional disparities in heart transplant mortality in the United States. Bacteremia and infective endocarditis following left-sided heart valve surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1