Managers as peer workers' allies: A qualitative study of managers' perceptions and actions to involve peer workers in Norwegian mental health and substance use services.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Mental Health Systems Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI:10.1186/s13033-023-00588-5
Kristina Bakke Åkerblom, Torbjørn Mohn-Haugen, Rita Agdal, Ottar Ness
{"title":"Managers as peer workers' allies: A qualitative study of managers' perceptions and actions to involve peer workers in Norwegian mental health and substance use services.","authors":"Kristina Bakke Åkerblom, Torbjørn Mohn-Haugen, Rita Agdal, Ottar Ness","doi":"10.1186/s13033-023-00588-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Citizens with experience and knowledge about what it is like to use mental health and substance use services are increasingly employed within similar services as peer workers. Peer workers are portrayed as achieving societal obligations and help ensure that the outputs from service provision are more effective. Even though peer workers have worked in mental health and substance use services for a while, few studies have focused on exploring managers' experiences and perspectives about involving peer workers. This knowledge is needed because these managers can enable and hinder equitable involvement and collaboration with peer workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative explorative study was chosen to explore the following research question: How do managers in Norwegian mental health and substance use services experience, relate to, and embrace peer workers as assets in these services? A researcher (Ph.D. student) and a coresearcher (peer worker) conducted four online focus groups with a strategic selection of 17 Norwegian mental health and substance use services managers who had some experience with the involvement of peer workers in their organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results identified using systematic text condensation are as follows: [1] Peer workers boost the ongoing shift toward increased service user involvement. [2] Peer workers are highly valued in the service transformation process. [3] Managers involve peer workers as partners in co-creation. The results show that managers connect with peer workers and facilitate their involvement in collaborative activities across the service cycle. Peer workers' proximity to service users and bridging capacity is highlighted as the reasons for their involvement. Thus, peer workers are involved in co-defining challenges, co-designing potential solutions, co-delivering those service solutions, and, sometimes, co-assessing service solutions to rethink and improve services. As such, peer workers are considered partners in co-creation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As managers involve peer workers, they increasingly discover peer workers' value, and because peer workers are involved, they increase their skills and capacity for collaboration. This research strengthens the knowledge base of the perceived value of peer workers' roles, bringing in new perspectives from management about utilizing and evaluating peer worker roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00588-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Citizens with experience and knowledge about what it is like to use mental health and substance use services are increasingly employed within similar services as peer workers. Peer workers are portrayed as achieving societal obligations and help ensure that the outputs from service provision are more effective. Even though peer workers have worked in mental health and substance use services for a while, few studies have focused on exploring managers' experiences and perspectives about involving peer workers. This knowledge is needed because these managers can enable and hinder equitable involvement and collaboration with peer workers.

Methods: A qualitative explorative study was chosen to explore the following research question: How do managers in Norwegian mental health and substance use services experience, relate to, and embrace peer workers as assets in these services? A researcher (Ph.D. student) and a coresearcher (peer worker) conducted four online focus groups with a strategic selection of 17 Norwegian mental health and substance use services managers who had some experience with the involvement of peer workers in their organizations.

Results: The results identified using systematic text condensation are as follows: [1] Peer workers boost the ongoing shift toward increased service user involvement. [2] Peer workers are highly valued in the service transformation process. [3] Managers involve peer workers as partners in co-creation. The results show that managers connect with peer workers and facilitate their involvement in collaborative activities across the service cycle. Peer workers' proximity to service users and bridging capacity is highlighted as the reasons for their involvement. Thus, peer workers are involved in co-defining challenges, co-designing potential solutions, co-delivering those service solutions, and, sometimes, co-assessing service solutions to rethink and improve services. As such, peer workers are considered partners in co-creation.

Conclusion: As managers involve peer workers, they increasingly discover peer workers' value, and because peer workers are involved, they increase their skills and capacity for collaboration. This research strengthens the knowledge base of the perceived value of peer workers' roles, bringing in new perspectives from management about utilizing and evaluating peer worker roles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为同伴工作者盟友的管理人员:对挪威精神健康和药物使用服务中管理人员对同伴工作者参与的看法和行动的定性研究。
背景:越来越多的人在类似的服务机构中担任同伴工作者,他们拥有使用心理健康和药物使用服务的经验和知识。同伴工作者被描述为履行社会义务,帮助确保提供的服务更加有效。尽管同伴工作者已经在心理健康和药物使用服务中工作了一段时间,但很少有研究集中探讨管理者对于同伴工作者参与的经验和观点。我们需要这方面的知识,因为这些管理者可以促进或阻碍同伴工作者的公平参与和合作:我们选择了一项定性探索性研究来探讨以下研究问题:挪威心理健康和药物使用服务机构的管理人员是如何体验同伴工作者、与同伴工作者建立联系并将同伴工作者视为这些服务机构的资产的?一名研究人员(博士生)和一名核心研究人员(同伴工作者)与17名挪威心理健康和药物使用服务机构的管理人员进行了四次在线焦点小组讨论,这些管理人员在同伴工作者参与其机构的工作方面具有一定的经验:结果:通过系统的文本压缩,确定了以下结果:[1)同伴工作者推动了服务使用者参与程度的不断提高。[2)同伴工作者在服务转型过程中受到高度重视。[3] 管理者让同伴工作者作为合作伙伴参与共同创造。研究结果表明,管理者与同伴工作者建立了联系,并促进他们参与整个服务周期的合作活动。同伴工作者接近服务用户和桥梁能力是他们参与的原因。因此,同伴工作者参与了共同确定挑战、共同设计潜在的解决方案、共同提供这些服务解决方案,有时还共同评估服务解决方案,以重新思考和改进服务。因此,同侪工作者被视为共同创造的合作伙伴:结论:随着管理者让同侪工作者参与进来,他们越来越多地发现了同侪工作者的价值,而且由于同侪工作者的参与,他们提高了协作技能和能力。这项研究加强了对同侪工作者角色价值认知的知识库,为管理层利用和评估同侪工作者角色带来了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reducing stigma and improving access to care for people with mental health conditions in the community: protocol for a multi-site feasibility intervention study (Indigo-Local). Reach, uptake, and psychological outcomes of two publicly funded internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy programs in Ontario, Canada: an observational study. Italian Evaluation and Excellence in REMS (ITAL-EE-REMS): appropriate placement of forensic patients in REMS forensic facilities. Evaluating Pakistan's mental healthcare system using World Health Organization's assessment instrument for mental health system (WHO-AIMS). A process study of early achievements and challenges in countries engaged with the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1