Preoperative clinical diagnostic accuracy of heart failure among patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: a single-centre prospective observational analysis

Jessica R. Golbus , Hyeon Joo , Allison M. Janda , Michael D. Maile , Keith D. Aaronson , Milo C. Engoren , Ruth B. Cassidy , Sachin Kheterpal , Michael R. Mathis
{"title":"Preoperative clinical diagnostic accuracy of heart failure among patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: a single-centre prospective observational analysis","authors":"Jessica R. Golbus ,&nbsp;Hyeon Joo ,&nbsp;Allison M. Janda ,&nbsp;Michael D. Maile ,&nbsp;Keith D. Aaronson ,&nbsp;Milo C. Engoren ,&nbsp;Ruth B. Cassidy ,&nbsp;Sachin Kheterpal ,&nbsp;Michael R. Mathis","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reliable diagnosis of heart failure during preoperative evaluation is important for perioperative management and long-term care. We aimed to quantify preoperative heart failure diagnostic accuracy and explore characteristics of patients with heart failure misdiagnoses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed an observational cohort study of adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery at an academic hospital between 2015 and 2019. A preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure was defined using keywords from the history and clinical examination or administrative documentation. Across stratified subsamples of cases with and without clinically diagnosed heart failure, health records were intensively reviewed by an expert panel to develop an adjudicated heart failure reference standard using diagnostic criteria congruent with consensus guidelines. We calculated agreement among experts, and analysed performance of clinically diagnosed heart failure compared with the adjudicated reference standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across 40 555 major noncardiac procedures, a stratified subsample of 511 patients was reviewed by the expert panel. The prevalence of heart failure was 9.1% based on clinically diagnosed compared with 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3–16.2%) estimated by the expert panel. Overall agreement and inter-rater reliability (kappa) among heart failure experts were 95% and 0.79, respectively. Based upon expert adjudication, heart failure was clinically diagnosed with an accuracy of 92.8% (90.6–95.1%), sensitivity 57.4% (53.1–61.7%), specificity 98.3% (97.1–99.4%), positive predictive value 83.5% (80.3–86.8%), and negative predictive value 93.8% (91.7–95.9%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Limitations exist to the preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure, with nearly half of cases undiagnosed preoperatively. Considering the risks of undiagnosed heart failure, efforts to improve preoperative heart failure diagnoses are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/89/main.PMC9835767.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609622001125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Reliable diagnosis of heart failure during preoperative evaluation is important for perioperative management and long-term care. We aimed to quantify preoperative heart failure diagnostic accuracy and explore characteristics of patients with heart failure misdiagnoses.

Methods

We performed an observational cohort study of adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery at an academic hospital between 2015 and 2019. A preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure was defined using keywords from the history and clinical examination or administrative documentation. Across stratified subsamples of cases with and without clinically diagnosed heart failure, health records were intensively reviewed by an expert panel to develop an adjudicated heart failure reference standard using diagnostic criteria congruent with consensus guidelines. We calculated agreement among experts, and analysed performance of clinically diagnosed heart failure compared with the adjudicated reference standard.

Results

Across 40 555 major noncardiac procedures, a stratified subsample of 511 patients was reviewed by the expert panel. The prevalence of heart failure was 9.1% based on clinically diagnosed compared with 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3–16.2%) estimated by the expert panel. Overall agreement and inter-rater reliability (kappa) among heart failure experts were 95% and 0.79, respectively. Based upon expert adjudication, heart failure was clinically diagnosed with an accuracy of 92.8% (90.6–95.1%), sensitivity 57.4% (53.1–61.7%), specificity 98.3% (97.1–99.4%), positive predictive value 83.5% (80.3–86.8%), and negative predictive value 93.8% (91.7–95.9%).

Conclusions

Limitations exist to the preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure, with nearly half of cases undiagnosed preoperatively. Considering the risks of undiagnosed heart failure, efforts to improve preoperative heart failure diagnoses are warranted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受重大非心脏手术患者心衰的术前临床诊断准确性:一项单中心前瞻性观察分析
背景术前评估中心衰的可靠诊断对围手术期管理和长期护理具有重要意义。我们旨在量化术前心衰诊断的准确性,并探讨心衰误诊患者的特点。方法:我们对2015年至2019年在某学术医院接受重大非心脏手术的成年人进行了一项观察性队列研究。心衰的术前临床诊断是根据病史、临床检查或行政文件中的关键词来确定的。在有和没有临床诊断的心力衰竭病例的分层亚样本中,专家小组对健康记录进行了深入审查,以使用与共识指南一致的诊断标准制定心力衰竭参考标准。我们计算了专家之间的一致意见,并分析了临床诊断心力衰竭的表现,将其与判定的参考标准进行了比较。结果在40555例主要非心脏手术中,专家小组对511例患者的分层亚样本进行了审查。临床诊断的心力衰竭患病率为9.1%,而专家小组估计的为13.3%(95%可信区间[CI], 10.3-16.2%)。心力衰竭专家的总体一致性和评分间可靠性(kappa)分别为95%和0.79。经专家判断,临床诊断心力衰竭的准确率为92.8%(90.6-95.1%),灵敏度为57.4%(53.1-61.7%),特异性为98.3%(97.1-99.4%),阳性预测值为83.5%(80.3-86.8%),阴性预测值为93.8%(91.7-95.9%)。结论心衰的术前临床诊断存在局限性,近半数患者术前未确诊。考虑到未确诊的心力衰竭的风险,努力提高术前心力衰竭的诊断是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive cardiac index estimation under general anaesthesia: comparison between the VenArt® device and transthoracic echocardiography☆ Interventions for iron deficiency with or without anaemia in visceral surgery: recommendations for future research Postoperative anaemia: the unseen challenge in cardiac surgery Access to haemodynamic evaluation tools in middle-income countries: a survey of 1593 anaesthetists and intensivists from 39 nations Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1