Ictal Blinking: Reappraisal of the Lateralization and Localization Value in Focal Seizures.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical EEG and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/15500594211070800
Ayse Nur Ozdag Acarli, Ayse Deniz Elmali, Nermin Gorkem Sirin, Betul Baykan, Nerses Bebek
{"title":"Ictal Blinking: Reappraisal of the Lateralization and Localization Value in Focal Seizures.","authors":"Ayse Nur Ozdag Acarli,&nbsp;Ayse Deniz Elmali,&nbsp;Nermin Gorkem Sirin,&nbsp;Betul Baykan,&nbsp;Nerses Bebek","doi":"10.1177/15500594211070800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> Although ictal blinking is significantly more frequent in generalized epilepsy, it has been reported as a rare but useful lateralizing sign in focal seizures when it is not associated with facial clonic twitching. This study aimed to raise awareness of eye blinking as a semiological lateralizing sign. <i>Method.</i> Our database over an 11-year period reviewed retrospectively to assess patients who had ictal blinking associated with focal seizures. <i>Results.</i> Among 632 patients, 14 (2.2%), who had 3 to 13 (7 ± 3) seizures during video-EEG monitoring, were included. Twenty-five percent of all 92 seizures displayed ictal blinking and each patient had one to five seizures with ictal blinking. Ictal blinking was unilateral in 17%, asymmetrical in 22% and symmetrical in 61%. The blinking appeared with a mean latency of 6.3 s (range 0-39) after the clinical seizure-onset, localized most often to fronto-temporal, then in frontal or occipital regions. Blinking was ipsilateral to ictal scalp EEG lateralization side in 83% (5/6) of the patients with unilateral/asymmetrical blinking. The exact lateralization and localization of ictal activity could not have been determined via EEG in most of the patients with symmetrical blinking, remarkably. <i>Conclusions.</i> Unilateral/asymmetrical blinking is one of the early components of the seizures and appears as a useful lateralizing sign, often associated with fronto-temporal seizure-onset. Symmetrical blinking, on the other hand, did not seem to be valuable in lateralization and localization of focal seizures. Future studies using invasive recordings and periocular electrodes are needed to evaluate the value of blinking in lateralization and localization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":"54 5","pages":"497-504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594211070800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction. Although ictal blinking is significantly more frequent in generalized epilepsy, it has been reported as a rare but useful lateralizing sign in focal seizures when it is not associated with facial clonic twitching. This study aimed to raise awareness of eye blinking as a semiological lateralizing sign. Method. Our database over an 11-year period reviewed retrospectively to assess patients who had ictal blinking associated with focal seizures. Results. Among 632 patients, 14 (2.2%), who had 3 to 13 (7 ± 3) seizures during video-EEG monitoring, were included. Twenty-five percent of all 92 seizures displayed ictal blinking and each patient had one to five seizures with ictal blinking. Ictal blinking was unilateral in 17%, asymmetrical in 22% and symmetrical in 61%. The blinking appeared with a mean latency of 6.3 s (range 0-39) after the clinical seizure-onset, localized most often to fronto-temporal, then in frontal or occipital regions. Blinking was ipsilateral to ictal scalp EEG lateralization side in 83% (5/6) of the patients with unilateral/asymmetrical blinking. The exact lateralization and localization of ictal activity could not have been determined via EEG in most of the patients with symmetrical blinking, remarkably. Conclusions. Unilateral/asymmetrical blinking is one of the early components of the seizures and appears as a useful lateralizing sign, often associated with fronto-temporal seizure-onset. Symmetrical blinking, on the other hand, did not seem to be valuable in lateralization and localization of focal seizures. Future studies using invasive recordings and periocular electrodes are needed to evaluate the value of blinking in lateralization and localization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突发性眨眼:对局灶性癫痫的偏侧和定位价值的重新评价。
介绍。虽然发作性眨眼在全身性癫痫中更为常见,但在局灶性癫痫中,当它与面部阵挛性抽搐不相关时,它是一种罕见但有用的偏侧体征。本研究旨在提高人们对眨眼作为一种符号学上的偏侧标志的认识。方法。我们回顾性回顾了11年的数据库,以评估与局灶性癫痫发作相关的临界眨眼患者。结果。632例患者中,有14例(2.2%)在视频脑电图监测期间出现3 ~ 13(7±3)次癫痫发作。在所有92次癫痫发作中,有25%的患者出现了发作性眨眼,每个患者都有1到5次发作性眨眼。17%的人单侧眨眼,22%的人不对称眨眼,61%的人对称眨眼。在临床癫痫发作后,眨眼的平均潜伏期为6.3 s(范围0-39),最常发生在额颞区,其次是额部或枕部。83%(5/6)的单侧/不对称眨眼患者的眨眼与头侧脑电图侧侧同侧。在大多数对称眨眼患者中,脑电图不能准确地确定其脑活动的偏侧和定位。结论。单侧/不对称眨眼是癫痫发作的早期症状之一,是一种有用的偏侧症状,通常与额颞叶癫痫发作有关。另一方面,对称眨眼在局灶性癫痫的偏侧和定位中似乎没有价值。未来的研究需要使用有创记录和眼周电极来评估眨眼在偏侧和定位中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
期刊最新文献
Ikelos-RWA. Validation of an Automatic Tool to Quantify REM Sleep Without Atonia. Age-dependent Electroencephalogram Characteristics During Different Levels of Anesthetic Depth. The Clinical Utility of Finding Unexpected Subclinical Spikes Detected by High-Density EEG During Neurodiagnostic Investigations Comparative Analysis of LORETA Z Score Neurofeedback and Cognitive Rehabilitation on Quality of Life and Response Inhibition in Individuals with Opioid Addiction Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Treatment-Resistant and Responsive Depression Cases with High Accuracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1