An easy-to-use semi-automatic volumetric evaluation for secondary bone grafting in patients with unilateral alveolar cleft

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Congenital Anomalies Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI:10.1111/cga.12534
Mizuki Teramoto, Motoki Katsube, Natsuko Utsunomiya, Yasuhiro Katayama, Hiroki Yamanaka, Itaru Tsuge, Yoshihiro Sowa, Michiharu Sakamoto, Naoki Morimoto
{"title":"An easy-to-use semi-automatic volumetric evaluation for secondary bone grafting in patients with unilateral alveolar cleft","authors":"Mizuki Teramoto,&nbsp;Motoki Katsube,&nbsp;Natsuko Utsunomiya,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Katayama,&nbsp;Hiroki Yamanaka,&nbsp;Itaru Tsuge,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Sowa,&nbsp;Michiharu Sakamoto,&nbsp;Naoki Morimoto","doi":"10.1111/cga.12534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surgical intervention for alveolar bone formation is important in patients with alveolar cleft; however, the treatment methods and materials are still controversial. A precise evaluation method for postoperative bone formation is important for comparing outcomes and establishing the best treatment protocol. The purpose of this study is to establish a new method of evaluating surgical outcomes for patients with alveolar cleft. Computed tomography datasets from 20 patients who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting were obtained before and 1 year after surgery. Six anatomical landmarks were used to superimpose the preoperative and mirrored preoperative volume and postoperative volume data. The cleft region was segmented by subtracting the preoperative from mirrored preoperative volume data, and the failed osteogenesis region was segmented by subtracting the postoperative volume data from the cleft region; subsequently, the bone formation ratio was calculated. Two observers performed this method using a free software 3D slicer and the average evaluation times were 12.7 and 13.2 min for observers 1 and 2, respectively. Method reliability was determined by evaluating intraclass correlation coefficients. The intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.96 for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97. Our method is practical for assessing bone formation after treatment, which does not require specific knowledge or software and can be used by ordinary physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":10626,"journal":{"name":"Congenital Anomalies","volume":"63 6","pages":"182-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cga.12534","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congenital Anomalies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cga.12534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical intervention for alveolar bone formation is important in patients with alveolar cleft; however, the treatment methods and materials are still controversial. A precise evaluation method for postoperative bone formation is important for comparing outcomes and establishing the best treatment protocol. The purpose of this study is to establish a new method of evaluating surgical outcomes for patients with alveolar cleft. Computed tomography datasets from 20 patients who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting were obtained before and 1 year after surgery. Six anatomical landmarks were used to superimpose the preoperative and mirrored preoperative volume and postoperative volume data. The cleft region was segmented by subtracting the preoperative from mirrored preoperative volume data, and the failed osteogenesis region was segmented by subtracting the postoperative volume data from the cleft region; subsequently, the bone formation ratio was calculated. Two observers performed this method using a free software 3D slicer and the average evaluation times were 12.7 and 13.2 min for observers 1 and 2, respectively. Method reliability was determined by evaluating intraclass correlation coefficients. The intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.96 for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97. Our method is practical for assessing bone formation after treatment, which does not require specific knowledge or software and can be used by ordinary physicians.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种易于使用的半自动容量评估方法用于单侧牙槽裂患者的二次植骨。
手术干预牙槽骨形成对牙槽裂患者很重要;然而,处理方法和材料仍存在争议。术后骨形成的精确评估方法对于比较结果和制定最佳治疗方案至关重要。本研究的目的是建立一种评估牙槽裂患者手术效果的新方法。我们获得了20例接受二次牙槽骨移植的患者术前和术后1年的计算机断层数据集。六个解剖标志被用来叠加术前和镜像术前体积和术后体积数据。通过从镜像的术前体积数据中减去术前数据来分割裂区,通过从裂区减去术后体积数据来分割成骨失败区域;随后,计算骨形成率。两名观察者使用免费软件3D切片器进行该方法,观察者1和2的平均评估时间分别为12.7和13.2 min。通过评价类内相关系数确定方法的信度。观察者1和观察者2的观察者组内相关系数分别为0.97和0.96。观察者间类内相关系数为0.97。我们的方法对治疗后骨形成的评估是实用的,不需要专门的知识或软件,普通医生都可以使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Congenital Anomalies
Congenital Anomalies PEDIATRICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Congenital Anomalies is the official English language journal of the Japanese Teratology Society, and publishes original articles in laboratory as well as clinical research in all areas of abnormal development and related fields, from all over the world. Although contributions by members of the teratology societies affiliated with The International Federation of Teratology Societies are given priority, contributions from non-members are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Acknowledgement Acoustic evaluation of voice signal distortion by videoconferencing platforms and devices used in telepractice for cleft palate Genitourinary and craniofacial/cervicothoracic anomalies in a neonate with in-utero mycophenolate mofetil exposure Congenital cytomegalovirus and pulmonary hypertension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1