Metabolic tumor parameters complement clinicopathological factors in prognosticating advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482
Ashish Mohite, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Jayant Goda, Swati Chugh, Archi Agrawal, Manju Sengar
{"title":"Metabolic tumor parameters complement clinicopathological factors in prognosticating advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.","authors":"Ashish Mohite,&nbsp;Venkatesh Rangarajan,&nbsp;Jayant Goda,&nbsp;Swati Chugh,&nbsp;Archi Agrawal,&nbsp;Manju Sengar","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma has a higher probability of relapse and recurrence. Classical clinicopathological parameters including the International Prognostic Score (IPS) have not been reliable in predicting prognosis or tailoring treatment. Since FDG PET/CT is the standard of care in staging Hodgkin Lymphoma, this study attempted to evaluate the clinical utility of baseline metabolic tumor parameters in a cohort of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III and IV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histology-proven advanced Hodgkin Patients presenting to our institute between 2012-2016 and treated with chemo-radiotherapy (ABVD / AEVD) were followed up till 2019. Quantitative PET/CT and clinicopathological parameters were used to estimate the Event Free Survival (EFS) in 100 patients. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare the survival times of prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 48.83 months (IQR:33.31-63.05 months), the five-year-EFS was 81%. Of the 100 patients, 16 had relapsed (16%) and none died at the last follow-up. On Univariate analysis, among non-PET parameters bulky disease (P=0.03) and B-symptoms (P=0.04) were significant while among PET/CT parameters SUV<sub>max</sub> (p=0.001), SUV<sub>mean</sub> (P=0.002), WBMTV2.5 (P<0.001), WBMTV41% (P<0.001), WBTLG2.5 (P<0.001) and WBTLG41% (P <0.001) predicted poorer EFS. 5-year EFS for patients with low WBMTV2.5 [<1038.3 cm3] was 89% and 35% for patients with high WBMTV2.5 [≥1038.3 cm3] (p <0.001). In a multivariate model, only WBMTV2.5 (P=0.03) independently predicted poorer EFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET-based metabolic parameter (WBMTV2.5) was able to prognosticate and complement the classical clinical prognostic factors in advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma. This parameter could have a surrogate value for prognosticating advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Better prognostication at baseline translates to tailored or risk-modified treatment and hence higher survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":72309,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"11 2","pages":"111-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma has a higher probability of relapse and recurrence. Classical clinicopathological parameters including the International Prognostic Score (IPS) have not been reliable in predicting prognosis or tailoring treatment. Since FDG PET/CT is the standard of care in staging Hodgkin Lymphoma, this study attempted to evaluate the clinical utility of baseline metabolic tumor parameters in a cohort of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III and IV).

Methods: Histology-proven advanced Hodgkin Patients presenting to our institute between 2012-2016 and treated with chemo-radiotherapy (ABVD / AEVD) were followed up till 2019. Quantitative PET/CT and clinicopathological parameters were used to estimate the Event Free Survival (EFS) in 100 patients. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare the survival times of prognostic factors.

Results: At a median follow-up of 48.83 months (IQR:33.31-63.05 months), the five-year-EFS was 81%. Of the 100 patients, 16 had relapsed (16%) and none died at the last follow-up. On Univariate analysis, among non-PET parameters bulky disease (P=0.03) and B-symptoms (P=0.04) were significant while among PET/CT parameters SUVmax (p=0.001), SUVmean (P=0.002), WBMTV2.5 (P<0.001), WBMTV41% (P<0.001), WBTLG2.5 (P<0.001) and WBTLG41% (P <0.001) predicted poorer EFS. 5-year EFS for patients with low WBMTV2.5 [<1038.3 cm3] was 89% and 35% for patients with high WBMTV2.5 [≥1038.3 cm3] (p <0.001). In a multivariate model, only WBMTV2.5 (P=0.03) independently predicted poorer EFS.

Conclusion: PET-based metabolic parameter (WBMTV2.5) was able to prognosticate and complement the classical clinical prognostic factors in advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma. This parameter could have a surrogate value for prognosticating advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Better prognostication at baseline translates to tailored or risk-modified treatment and hence higher survival.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代谢肿瘤参数补充临床病理因素在预后晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤。
目的:晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤具有较高的复发和复发概率。包括国际预后评分(IPS)在内的经典临床病理参数在预测预后或定制治疗方面并不可靠。由于FDG PET/CT是霍奇金淋巴瘤分期的标准护理,本研究试图评估基线代谢肿瘤参数在晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤(III期和IV期)队列中的临床应用。方法:2012-2016年期间,组织学证实的晚期霍奇金患者在我们研究所接受化疗放疗(ABVD / AEVD)治疗,随访至2019年。采用定量PET/CT和临床病理参数估计100例患者的无事件生存期(EFS)。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验比较预后因素的生存时间。结果:中位随访48.83个月(IQR:33.31-63.05个月),5年efs为81%。在100例患者中,16例复发(16%),最后一次随访时无患者死亡。在单因素分析中,在非PET参数中,体积病(P=0.03)和b症状(P=0.04)显著,而在PET/CT参数中,SUVmax (P= 0.001)、SUVmean (P=0.002)、WBMTV2.5 (P)显著。结论:基于PET的代谢参数(WBMTV2.5)能够预测并补充晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的经典临床预后因素。该参数可作为预测晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的替代值。基线时更好的预后转化为量身定制或风险调整治疗,从而提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1