Implementation of a New Clinical Testing Tool to Assess Patients During Ictal and Postictal Periods.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroscience Nursing Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000646
Sumika Ouchida, Armin Nikpour, Maricar Senturias, Toni E Pears, Greg Fairbrother
{"title":"Implementation of a New Clinical Testing Tool to Assess Patients During Ictal and Postictal Periods.","authors":"Sumika Ouchida,&nbsp;Armin Nikpour,&nbsp;Maricar Senturias,&nbsp;Toni E Pears,&nbsp;Greg Fairbrother","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: A seizure is a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance of the cortical neurons in the brain, which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness. Clinical signs and symptoms before, during, and after a seizure can help to determine the seizure onset. The use of standardized clinical testing tools has been reported as being valuable, although also challenging, by some institutions. This study investigated the effectiveness of implementing a new clinical testing tool designed with an emphasis on simplicity for use during and after seizures. METHODS: A pre-and-post evaluation study was conducted from January 2020 to November 2020 in the epilepsy monitoring unit/neurology unit at a hospital in Sydney, Australia. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of clinical testing during seizures. The secondary outcome of interest was nurse knowledge about clinical testing during a seizure. This knowledge was measured via testing before and after clinical education sessions. The third outcome of interest was nurse confidence regarding the use of the clinical testing tool. The confidence level was measured via posteducation session follow-up surveying. RESULTS: Forty-seven nursing staff (10 neurophysiology nurse technologists and 37 neurology unit nurses) participated in the education program. Forty-four seizures were evaluated. Clinical testing during ictal and postictal periods was performed by nursing staff 82% of the time during 2020, compared with 67% during the 2018 to 2019 preeducation comparison period. This difference was not statistically significant, but it was clinically relevant (P = .07). In addition, the time from seizure alarm to clinical testing improved significantly from a median of 30.5 seconds in 2018 to 2019 to 14 seconds in 2020 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The tool is easy and convenient for nursing staff to perform clinical examinations accurately during ictal and postictal periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"54 3","pages":"124-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: A seizure is a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance of the cortical neurons in the brain, which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness. Clinical signs and symptoms before, during, and after a seizure can help to determine the seizure onset. The use of standardized clinical testing tools has been reported as being valuable, although also challenging, by some institutions. This study investigated the effectiveness of implementing a new clinical testing tool designed with an emphasis on simplicity for use during and after seizures. METHODS: A pre-and-post evaluation study was conducted from January 2020 to November 2020 in the epilepsy monitoring unit/neurology unit at a hospital in Sydney, Australia. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of clinical testing during seizures. The secondary outcome of interest was nurse knowledge about clinical testing during a seizure. This knowledge was measured via testing before and after clinical education sessions. The third outcome of interest was nurse confidence regarding the use of the clinical testing tool. The confidence level was measured via posteducation session follow-up surveying. RESULTS: Forty-seven nursing staff (10 neurophysiology nurse technologists and 37 neurology unit nurses) participated in the education program. Forty-four seizures were evaluated. Clinical testing during ictal and postictal periods was performed by nursing staff 82% of the time during 2020, compared with 67% during the 2018 to 2019 preeducation comparison period. This difference was not statistically significant, but it was clinically relevant (P = .07). In addition, the time from seizure alarm to clinical testing improved significantly from a median of 30.5 seconds in 2018 to 2019 to 14 seconds in 2020 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The tool is easy and convenient for nursing staff to perform clinical examinations accurately during ictal and postictal periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的临床测试工具的实施,以评估患者在发作期和产后期。
摘要:背景:癫痫发作是大脑皮层神经元突然发生的不受控制的电干扰,可引起行为、运动、感觉和意识的改变。癫痫发作之前、期间和之后的临床体征和症状有助于确定癫痫发作。一些机构报告说,使用标准化临床测试工具是有价值的,尽管也具有挑战性。本研究调查了实施一种新的临床测试工具的有效性,该工具的设计强调了癫痫发作期间和发作后使用的简单性。方法:2020年1月至2020年11月,在澳大利亚悉尼一家医院的癫痫监测部门/神经内科进行了一项前后评估研究。研究的主要结果是癫痫发作期间临床试验的发生率。研究的次要结果是护士对癫痫发作期间临床检查的了解。这些知识是通过临床教育课程前后的测试来衡量的。感兴趣的第三个结果是护士对使用临床测试工具的信心。通过教育后随访调查测量置信水平。结果:47名护理人员(神经生理护理技师10名,神经内科护士37名)参加了培训。对44例癫痫发作进行了评估。在2020年期间,82%的临床测试是由护理人员进行的,而在2018年至2019年的学前教育比较期间,这一比例为67%。差异无统计学意义,但具有临床相关性(P = .07)。从癫痫发作报警到临床检测的时间中位数从2018年的30.5秒显著提高到2019年的14秒(P < 0.001)。结论:该工具操作简单,便于护理人员在产前和产后准确地进行临床检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team. The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.
期刊最新文献
Resilience of Patients With Brain Tumor While Awaiting Surgery Fever, Hyperglycemia, and Swallowing Management in Stroke Unit and Non–Stroke-Unit European Hospitals: A Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC) Europe Substudy Peer Review Should Be a Partnership to Help the Author Get Published Multidisciplinary Teamwork Perceptions When Mobilizing Ventilated Neurosurgery Patients. Illness Uncertainty of the Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Coil Embolization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1