The association of the localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use in male veterans with transtibial amputation.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/10400435.2022.2079763
Kamiar Ghoseiri, Mohammad Yusuf Rastkhadiv, Mostafa Allami, Phillip Page, Lars L Andersen, Duane C Button
{"title":"The association of the localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use in male veterans with transtibial amputation.","authors":"Kamiar Ghoseiri,&nbsp;Mohammad Yusuf Rastkhadiv,&nbsp;Mostafa Allami,&nbsp;Phillip Page,&nbsp;Lars L Andersen,&nbsp;Duane C Button","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2079763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association of localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use has clinical implications, however, rarely been assessed. This study aimed to investigate pain sensitivity and explore its range, variability, and association with prosthesis use alongside other demographic and clinical characteristics of veterans with transtibial amputation. Pain sensitivity was determined as pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pressure tolerance (PT) in 19 male veterans with a mean age of 49.5 years using pressure algometry at 12 anatomical locations on‎ the residual limb. A comparison of pain sensitivity at each location, and among anatomical locations and participants was explored using independent <i>t</i>-test, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. Pain sensitivity range (PSR), the difference between PT and PPT, was significantly different (<i>p <</i> 0.05) at mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and the distal end of the tibia. The lowest PPT and PT (20.5 and 33 Ncm<sup>-2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.13) were recorded at the distal end of the residual limb, and the highest PPT and PT (73.4 and 94.3 Ncm<sup>-2</sup>, <i>p =</i> 0.03) were recorded at the mid-patellar tendon. Pain sensitivity was significantly different among anatomical locations and participants. The correlation tests (Pearson and partial eta squared) showed non-significant associations of pain sensitivity with participants' demographic and clinical characteristics except for daily prosthesis use. The mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and distal end of the tibia revealed the lowest pain hypersensitivity ‎due to higher PSR. Longer daily prosthesis use was associated with increased pain sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2079763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The association of localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use has clinical implications, however, rarely been assessed. This study aimed to investigate pain sensitivity and explore its range, variability, and association with prosthesis use alongside other demographic and clinical characteristics of veterans with transtibial amputation. Pain sensitivity was determined as pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pressure tolerance (PT) in 19 male veterans with a mean age of 49.5 years using pressure algometry at 12 anatomical locations on‎ the residual limb. A comparison of pain sensitivity at each location, and among anatomical locations and participants was explored using independent t-test, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. Pain sensitivity range (PSR), the difference between PT and PPT, was significantly different (p < 0.05) at mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and the distal end of the tibia. The lowest PPT and PT (20.5 and 33 Ncm-2, p = 0.13) were recorded at the distal end of the residual limb, and the highest PPT and PT (73.4 and 94.3 Ncm-2, p = 0.03) were recorded at the mid-patellar tendon. Pain sensitivity was significantly different among anatomical locations and participants. The correlation tests (Pearson and partial eta squared) showed non-significant associations of pain sensitivity with participants' demographic and clinical characteristics except for daily prosthesis use. The mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and distal end of the tibia revealed the lowest pain hypersensitivity ‎due to higher PSR. Longer daily prosthesis use was associated with increased pain sensitivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍军人残肢局部疼痛敏感性与义肢使用的关系。
残肢局部疼痛敏感性与义肢使用的关联具有临床意义,但很少被评估。本研究旨在调查退伍军人的疼痛敏感性,并探讨其范围、变异性以及与假体使用以及其他人口统计学和临床特征的关系。对19例平均年龄49.5岁的男性退伍军人残肢12个解剖位置采用压力测量法测定其疼痛敏感性为压力痛阈值(PPT)和压力耐受性(PT)。分别采用独立t检验、方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验对各部位、解剖部位和参与者的疼痛敏感性进行比较。疼痛敏感范围(PSR), PT和PPT的差异,在髌中肌腱、胫骨内侧耀斑和胫骨远端有显著差异(p 0.05)。残肢远端PPT和PT最低(20.5和33 Ncm-2, p = 0.13),髌中肌腱PPT和PT最高(73.4和94.3 Ncm-2, p = 0.03)。不同解剖部位和参与者的疼痛敏感性有显著差异。相关检验(Pearson和偏eta平方)显示,除日常义肢使用外,疼痛敏感性与受试者的人口学和临床特征无显著相关性。髌中肌腱、胫骨内侧耀斑和胫骨远端显示,由于较高的PSR,疼痛超敏反应最低。每天更长时间的假体使用与疼痛敏感性增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
期刊最新文献
Usability of an augmented reality bedtime routine application for autistic children. Rehabilitation professional and user evaluation of an integrated push-pull lever drive system for wheelchair mobility. Development and content validation of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA) outcome tool. Design and evaluation of the Afari: A three-wheeled mobility and balance support device for outdoor exercise. Intelligent assistive technology devices for persons with dementia: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1