Predictors of Time to Aneurysm Repair and Mortality in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroscience Nursing Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000660
Tiffany O Sheehan, Nicolle W Davis, Yi Guo, Debra Lynch Kelly, Saunjoo L Yoon, Ann L Horgas
{"title":"Predictors of Time to Aneurysm Repair and Mortality in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.","authors":"Tiffany O Sheehan,&nbsp;Nicolle W Davis,&nbsp;Yi Guo,&nbsp;Debra Lynch Kelly,&nbsp;Saunjoo L Yoon,&nbsp;Ann L Horgas","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND : Prompt aneurysm repair is essential to prevent rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. To date, most studies on this topic have focused on 1 set of predictors (eg, hospital or patient characteristics) and on 1 outcome (either time to aneurysm repair or mortality). The purpose of this study was to test a model that includes hospital and patient characteristics as predictors of time to aneurysm repair and mortality, controlling for disease severity and comorbidity, and considering time to aneurysm repair as a potential influence in these relationships. METHODS : A sample of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with a principal procedure of clipping or coiling was selected (n = 387) from a statewide administrative database for cross-sectional retrospective analysis. The primary study outcome was in-hospital mortality. Independent variables were level of stroke center, age, race, sex, and type of aneurysm repair. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of in-hospital death. RESULTS : Patients who underwent a coiling procedure were more likely to be treated within the first 24 hours of admission compared with those undergoing clipping (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.84; P = .01). Patients treated at a certified comprehensive stroke center (CSC) had a 72% reduction in odds of death compared with those treated at primary stroke centers (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10-0.77; P = .01), after controlling for disease severity and comorbid conditions. Time to aneurysm repair was not significantly associated with mortality and did not influence the relationship between hospital and patient characteristics and mortality. CONCLUSION : Our results indicate that treatment at a CSC was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality. Time to aneurysm repair did not influence mortality and did not explain the mortality benefit observed in CSCs. Research is needed to explore interdisciplinary hospital factors including nursing and nurse-sensitive interventions that may explain the relationship between CSCs and mortality outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"54 5","pages":"182-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND : Prompt aneurysm repair is essential to prevent rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. To date, most studies on this topic have focused on 1 set of predictors (eg, hospital or patient characteristics) and on 1 outcome (either time to aneurysm repair or mortality). The purpose of this study was to test a model that includes hospital and patient characteristics as predictors of time to aneurysm repair and mortality, controlling for disease severity and comorbidity, and considering time to aneurysm repair as a potential influence in these relationships. METHODS : A sample of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with a principal procedure of clipping or coiling was selected (n = 387) from a statewide administrative database for cross-sectional retrospective analysis. The primary study outcome was in-hospital mortality. Independent variables were level of stroke center, age, race, sex, and type of aneurysm repair. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of in-hospital death. RESULTS : Patients who underwent a coiling procedure were more likely to be treated within the first 24 hours of admission compared with those undergoing clipping (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.84; P = .01). Patients treated at a certified comprehensive stroke center (CSC) had a 72% reduction in odds of death compared with those treated at primary stroke centers (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10-0.77; P = .01), after controlling for disease severity and comorbid conditions. Time to aneurysm repair was not significantly associated with mortality and did not influence the relationship between hospital and patient characteristics and mortality. CONCLUSION : Our results indicate that treatment at a CSC was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality. Time to aneurysm repair did not influence mortality and did not explain the mortality benefit observed in CSCs. Research is needed to explore interdisciplinary hospital factors including nursing and nurse-sensitive interventions that may explain the relationship between CSCs and mortality outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血动脉瘤修复时间和死亡率的预测因素。
摘要:背景:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后,及时修复动脉瘤是防止再出血的关键。迄今为止,关于这一主题的大多数研究都集中在一组预测因素(如医院或患者特征)和一种结果(动脉瘤修复时间或死亡率)上。本研究的目的是测试一个模型,该模型包括医院和患者特征作为动脉瘤修复时间和死亡率的预测因子,控制疾病严重程度和合并症,并考虑动脉瘤修复时间作为这些关系的潜在影响。方法:从全国行政数据库中选择主要手术为夹持或卷取的动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者(n = 387)进行横断面回顾性分析。主要研究结果为住院死亡率。自变量为脑卒中中心水平、年龄、种族、性别和动脉瘤修复类型。采用层次逻辑回归估计住院死亡概率。结果:与接受夹持术的患者相比,接受夹持术的患者更有可能在入院前24小时内接受治疗(优势比,0.54;95% ci, 0.35-0.84;P = 0.01)。在经认证的综合卒中中心(CSC)治疗的患者与在初级卒中中心治疗的患者相比,死亡几率降低了72%(优势比,0.28;95% ci, 0.10-0.77;P = 0.01),在控制疾病严重程度和合并症条件后。动脉瘤修复时间与死亡率无显著相关,也不影响医院和患者特征与死亡率之间的关系。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在CSC治疗与较低的院内死亡风险相关。动脉瘤修复时间不影响死亡率,也不能解释在csc中观察到的死亡率降低。需要研究探索跨学科的医院因素,包括护理和护士敏感干预,这些因素可能解释csc与死亡率结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team. The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.
期刊最新文献
Resilience of Patients With Brain Tumor While Awaiting Surgery Fever, Hyperglycemia, and Swallowing Management in Stroke Unit and Non–Stroke-Unit European Hospitals: A Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC) Europe Substudy Peer Review Should Be a Partnership to Help the Author Get Published Multidisciplinary Teamwork Perceptions When Mobilizing Ventilated Neurosurgery Patients. Illness Uncertainty of the Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Coil Embolization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1