Lessons on Increasing Racial and Health Equity From Accountable Health Communities.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000356
Brandon G Wilson, Emily Jones
{"title":"Lessons on Increasing Racial and Health Equity From Accountable Health Communities.","authors":"Brandon G Wilson,&nbsp;Emily Jones","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Accountable Health Communities model (AHC) was developed to test whether systematically screening for health-related social needs and referrals to community-based organizations to resolve unmet needs would affect healthcare use and costs for CMS beneficiaries. Purpose: The AHC model required applicants to develop Disparities Impact Statements (DIS), to increase the model's potential impact on health equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors conducted a thematic analysis of awardees' DISs to identify minority and underserved populations of focus, and the strategies awardees used to increase equitable participation in the model by minority and underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most awardees focused on multiple minority and underserved populations and used multipronged innovative strategies to pursue equity goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering recent health equity advancements as Executive Order 13985 and the release of CMS Innovation Center's Strategy Refresh, with highlights of health equity best practices from the AHC model, assessing use of DISs in the AHC model provides valuable lessons. Implications: Given HHS' broadscale promotion of DISs adoption as a viable quality improvement approach to achieving health equity, disseminating how the tool was used by a myriad of organizational types in the AHC model is critically important to improving future efforts to increase equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"44 5","pages":"276-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The Accountable Health Communities model (AHC) was developed to test whether systematically screening for health-related social needs and referrals to community-based organizations to resolve unmet needs would affect healthcare use and costs for CMS beneficiaries. Purpose: The AHC model required applicants to develop Disparities Impact Statements (DIS), to increase the model's potential impact on health equity.

Methods: Authors conducted a thematic analysis of awardees' DISs to identify minority and underserved populations of focus, and the strategies awardees used to increase equitable participation in the model by minority and underserved populations.

Results: Most awardees focused on multiple minority and underserved populations and used multipronged innovative strategies to pursue equity goals.

Conclusions: Considering recent health equity advancements as Executive Order 13985 and the release of CMS Innovation Center's Strategy Refresh, with highlights of health equity best practices from the AHC model, assessing use of DISs in the AHC model provides valuable lessons. Implications: Given HHS' broadscale promotion of DISs adoption as a viable quality improvement approach to achieving health equity, disseminating how the tool was used by a myriad of organizational types in the AHC model is critically important to improving future efforts to increase equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从负责任的卫生社区增加种族和卫生公平的经验教训。
背景:开发负责任的健康社区模型(AHC)是为了测试系统筛查与健康相关的社会需求和转介到社区组织以解决未满足的需求是否会影响CMS受益人的医疗保健使用和成本。目的:AHC模型要求申请人制定差异影响声明(DIS),以增加模型对卫生公平的潜在影响。方法:作者对获奖者的DISs进行了专题分析,以确定重点关注的少数民族和服务不足人群,以及获奖者用于增加少数民族和服务不足人群公平参与模型的策略。结果:大多数获奖者关注多个少数民族和服务不足的人群,并使用多管齐下的创新策略来追求公平目标。结论:考虑到13985号行政命令和CMS创新中心发布的战略更新,以及AHC模式中卫生公平最佳实践的亮点,评估DISs在AHC模式中的使用提供了宝贵的经验教训。含义:鉴于卫生与公众服务部广泛推广采用DISs作为实现卫生公平的一种可行的质量改进方法,传播AHC模型中无数组织类型如何使用该工具对于改善未来增加公平的努力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Implementation of an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol and Order Set for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. Improving Time to Antibiotics for Long-Bone Open Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Increasing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Resident-Run Clinic Through Partnership With Ophthalmology Clinic: A Pilot Study. Collaboration to Remove Barriers to Pump Integration With the Electronic Health Record. The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1