{"title":"Zeroing a Transducer on an External Ventricular Drain.","authors":"Rachel Malloy","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: External ventricular drains (EVDs) are commonly used in severely brain-injured patients to diagnose intracranial hypertension. The accuracy of the intracranial pressure reading is dependent on zeroing the external transducer to air. Recent concern about zeroing techniques has been identified in the neuroscience community. The open method requires removing the nonvented cap, and the closed method requires zeroing through the filter at the top of the burette. This critical appraisal seeks to explore whether zeroing a transducer on an EVD through the filter of the burette provides the same baseline zero as opening the transducer to air. METHODS: Independent searches in CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science were conducted using \"external ventricular drain* OR EVD AND transducer\"; secondary search terms included \"zero AND transducer\" AND \"ventric.\" RESULTS: Database search produced 1 single observation study and 2 clinical practice guidelines from neuroscience professional organizations. The single observation study provided no evidence of equivalence between the 2 zeroing methods; the 2 clinical practice guidelines reference the open method. The transducer manufacturer's instructions for use direct the clinician to open the transducer to air by removing the nonvented cap. CONCLUSION: The question \"Does zeroing the transducer on an EVD through the filter of the burette provide the same baseline zero as opening the transducer to air?\" cannot be answered with the results of this appraisal. However, evidence found in the literature does suggest an open method to ensure the most accurate physiological value for treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"55 2","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: BACKGROUND: External ventricular drains (EVDs) are commonly used in severely brain-injured patients to diagnose intracranial hypertension. The accuracy of the intracranial pressure reading is dependent on zeroing the external transducer to air. Recent concern about zeroing techniques has been identified in the neuroscience community. The open method requires removing the nonvented cap, and the closed method requires zeroing through the filter at the top of the burette. This critical appraisal seeks to explore whether zeroing a transducer on an EVD through the filter of the burette provides the same baseline zero as opening the transducer to air. METHODS: Independent searches in CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science were conducted using "external ventricular drain* OR EVD AND transducer"; secondary search terms included "zero AND transducer" AND "ventric." RESULTS: Database search produced 1 single observation study and 2 clinical practice guidelines from neuroscience professional organizations. The single observation study provided no evidence of equivalence between the 2 zeroing methods; the 2 clinical practice guidelines reference the open method. The transducer manufacturer's instructions for use direct the clinician to open the transducer to air by removing the nonvented cap. CONCLUSION: The question "Does zeroing the transducer on an EVD through the filter of the burette provide the same baseline zero as opening the transducer to air?" cannot be answered with the results of this appraisal. However, evidence found in the literature does suggest an open method to ensure the most accurate physiological value for treatment decisions.
摘要:背景:脑室外引流(EVDs)是重型颅脑损伤患者诊断颅内高压的常用方法。颅内压读数的准确性取决于外部换能器对空气的归零。最近,神经科学界已经发现了对归零技术的关注。打开的方法需要移除不通风的盖子,关闭的方法需要通过滴管顶部的过滤器调零。这项关键的评估旨在探索通过滴管过滤器对EVD上的换能器进行归零是否与将换能器打开到空气中提供相同的基线归零。方法:采用“外脑室引流* OR EVD and transducer”独立检索CINAHL、PubMed和Web of Science;次要搜索词包括“零与换能器”和“心室”。结果:数据库检索产生1个单观察研究和2个来自神经科学专业组织的临床实践指南。单观察研究没有提供两种归零方法等效的证据;2个临床实践指南参考了开放式方法。换能器制造商的使用说明指导临床医生通过移除无通气帽将换能器打开到空气中。结论:“通过滴管过滤器将EVD上的换能器调零与将换能器打开到空气中提供相同的基线零点吗?”这个问题无法用本次评估的结果来回答。然而,在文献中发现的证据确实建议采用开放的方法来确保治疗决策中最准确的生理价值。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team.
The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.