Effects of a 16-Week Multimodal Exercise Program on Physical Performance in Individuals With Dementia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000308
Bettina Barisch-Fritz, Sandra Trautwein, Andrea Scharpf, Janina Krell-Roesch, Alexander Woll
{"title":"Effects of a 16-Week Multimodal Exercise Program on Physical Performance in Individuals With Dementia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Bettina Barisch-Fritz,&nbsp;Sandra Trautwein,&nbsp;Andrea Scharpf,&nbsp;Janina Krell-Roesch,&nbsp;Alexander Woll","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Dementia affects physical as well as cognitive performance. In individuals with dementia (IWD), decline in physical performance increases with disease progression and is associated with higher functional dependence and decreased quality of life. It is paramount to examine factors that potentially preserve physical performance in IWD, particularly in light of conflicting findings on the effectiveness of physical activity interventions on physical performance of IWD, mainly due to limited number of high-quality studies, large heterogeneity in methods used, or insufficient reporting of methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 16-week multimodal exercise program (MEP) combining physical and cognitive tasks on physical performance in IWD, and to identify individual characteristics of MEP responders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter randomized controlled trial with assessment methods identified by an expert panel was conducted. We included 319 IWD of mild to moderate severity, older than 65 years, who underwent a standardized MEP specifically designed for IWD. At baseline and immediately after the MEP, we assessed physical performance (ie, mobility, balance, and strength) and function of lower extremities (primary outcomes). Potential effects of the MEP on physical performance were identified using 2-factor analyses of variance with repeated measurements within 2 samples (ie, intention-to-treat and per-protocol sample). Additionally, we compared characteristics related to physical performance between positive, non-, and negative responders.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Neither analysis procedure revealed statistically significant time×group effects. However, 28% to 40% of participants were positive responders with regard to balance, and strength and function of lower extremities; and these persons had statistically significant lower baseline performance in the corresponding assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This randomized controlled trial revealed no overall effects of the MEP on physical performance, probably due to high heterogeneity of the study sample. Findings in responder analysis showed that IWD with lower physical performance at baseline tended to benefit more than those with higher baseline performance. Thus, a higher degree of individualization of the MEP depending on baseline performance on IWD may improve overall MEP effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":"45 1","pages":"3-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background and purpose: Dementia affects physical as well as cognitive performance. In individuals with dementia (IWD), decline in physical performance increases with disease progression and is associated with higher functional dependence and decreased quality of life. It is paramount to examine factors that potentially preserve physical performance in IWD, particularly in light of conflicting findings on the effectiveness of physical activity interventions on physical performance of IWD, mainly due to limited number of high-quality studies, large heterogeneity in methods used, or insufficient reporting of methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 16-week multimodal exercise program (MEP) combining physical and cognitive tasks on physical performance in IWD, and to identify individual characteristics of MEP responders.

Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial with assessment methods identified by an expert panel was conducted. We included 319 IWD of mild to moderate severity, older than 65 years, who underwent a standardized MEP specifically designed for IWD. At baseline and immediately after the MEP, we assessed physical performance (ie, mobility, balance, and strength) and function of lower extremities (primary outcomes). Potential effects of the MEP on physical performance were identified using 2-factor analyses of variance with repeated measurements within 2 samples (ie, intention-to-treat and per-protocol sample). Additionally, we compared characteristics related to physical performance between positive, non-, and negative responders.

Results and discussion: Neither analysis procedure revealed statistically significant time×group effects. However, 28% to 40% of participants were positive responders with regard to balance, and strength and function of lower extremities; and these persons had statistically significant lower baseline performance in the corresponding assessments.

Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial revealed no overall effects of the MEP on physical performance, probably due to high heterogeneity of the study sample. Findings in responder analysis showed that IWD with lower physical performance at baseline tended to benefit more than those with higher baseline performance. Thus, a higher degree of individualization of the MEP depending on baseline performance on IWD may improve overall MEP effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项多中心随机对照试验:16周多模式运动计划对痴呆患者身体表现的影响
背景和目的:痴呆症影响身体和认知表现。在痴呆症患者(IWD)中,身体机能的下降随着疾病的进展而增加,并与更高的功能依赖性和生活质量下降有关。重要的是要检查可能保持IWD患者身体表现的因素,特别是考虑到关于体育活动干预对IWD患者身体表现的有效性的相互矛盾的发现,这主要是由于高质量研究数量有限,使用的方法存在很大的异质性,或者方法报告不足。本研究的目的是探讨为期16周的多模式运动计划(MEP)结合身体和认知任务对IWD患者身体表现的影响,并确定MEP应答者的个体特征。方法:采用专家小组确定的评估方法进行多中心随机对照试验。我们纳入了319例轻度至中度重度IWD患者,年龄大于65岁,接受了专门为IWD设计的标准化MEP。在基线和MEP后,我们评估了身体表现(即流动性、平衡和力量)和下肢功能(主要结果)。MEP对身体表现的潜在影响通过在2个样本(即意向治疗样本和协议样本)中重复测量的2因素方差分析来确定。此外,我们比较了积极、非和消极反应者之间与身体表现相关的特征。结果和讨论:两种分析程序都没有显示统计学上显著的time×group效应。然而,28%至40%的参与者在平衡、下肢力量和功能方面表现出积极反应;这些人在相应的评估中有统计学上显著的较低的基线表现。结论:这项随机对照试验显示,MEP对身体表现没有总体影响,可能是由于研究样本的高度异质性。应答者分析的结果显示,基线时身体表现较差的IWD患者往往比基线表现较高的IWD患者受益更多。因此,根据IWD的基线表现对MEP进行更高程度的个性化可能会提高MEP的整体有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of the Predictive Qualities of Walking Speed in Older Adults. Associations of Usual and Fast Gait Speed With Physical Performance and Balance Confidence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Implications for Assessment. Simple Mobility Tests Predict Use of Assistive Devices in Older Adults. Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Assessing Stair Function in Older Adults. The Power of Language: Words to Mend or Fuel Ageism Within Geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1