Forensic rhetoric: COVID-19, the forum and the boundaries of healthcare evidence.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2023-012609
David Houston Jones
{"title":"Forensic rhetoric: COVID-19, the forum and the boundaries of healthcare evidence.","authors":"David Houston Jones","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2023-012609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into sharp focus the shifting role of healthcare evidence in public health presentations. This article investigates the rhetoric of those presentations as a phenomenon indicating both the commitment to evidence-based public health messaging and its political loading in three interlinked case studies: computer-generated imagery ; 'podium' presentation and the NSO Fleming leak of COVID-19 contact tracing data. The pandemic has seen healthcare evidence attain ever-greater visibility in public forums, and those forums have themselves undergone rapid transformation. 'Podium' presentations such as press conferences have featured colourful imagery, and the manifold visualisations of SARS-CoV-2 which have accompanied television broadcasts and web pages display an insistent internal rhetoric. I analyse both forms of rhetoric for what they say about the 'forensic' moment created by COVID-19, and evaluate each in relation to Weizman's conception of the forum, which enables both 'frontstage' corporate and governmental image-building and public scrutiny. This paper evaluates the politics of the presentational strategies which have arisen around COVID-19 and the ethical potential of the forum.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into sharp focus the shifting role of healthcare evidence in public health presentations. This article investigates the rhetoric of those presentations as a phenomenon indicating both the commitment to evidence-based public health messaging and its political loading in three interlinked case studies: computer-generated imagery ; 'podium' presentation and the NSO Fleming leak of COVID-19 contact tracing data. The pandemic has seen healthcare evidence attain ever-greater visibility in public forums, and those forums have themselves undergone rapid transformation. 'Podium' presentations such as press conferences have featured colourful imagery, and the manifold visualisations of SARS-CoV-2 which have accompanied television broadcasts and web pages display an insistent internal rhetoric. I analyse both forms of rhetoric for what they say about the 'forensic' moment created by COVID-19, and evaluate each in relation to Weizman's conception of the forum, which enables both 'frontstage' corporate and governmental image-building and public scrutiny. This paper evaluates the politics of the presentational strategies which have arisen around COVID-19 and the ethical potential of the forum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医修辞学:COVID-19、论坛和医疗证据的界限。
COVID-19 大流行使人们更加关注医疗保健证据在公共卫生演讲中的角色转变。本文通过三个相互关联的案例研究:计算机生成图像、"讲台 "演讲和国家统计局弗莱明泄漏 COVID-19 接触者追踪数据,将这些演讲的修辞作为一种现象进行调查,既表明了对以证据为基础的公共卫生信息传递的承诺,也表明了其政治负载。大流行使医疗保健证据在公共论坛上的能见度越来越高,而这些论坛本身也经历了迅速的转变。新闻发布会等 "讲台 "上的演示以丰富多彩的图像为特色,而伴随着电视广播和网页出现的关于 SARS-CoV-2 的多种可视化图像则显示出一种持续的内部修辞。我分析了这两种形式的修辞对 COVID-19 创造的 "法医 "时刻的影响,并结合魏茨曼对论坛的构想对每一种修辞进行了评估,魏茨曼的论坛构想既能在 "前台 "树立企业和政府形象,又能接受公众监督。本文评估了围绕 COVID-19 所产生的展示策略的政治性以及论坛的伦理潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
期刊最新文献
Imagining alternative futures with augmentative and alternative communication: a manifesto. Why robot embodiment matters: questions of disability, race and intersectionality in the design of social robots. Correspondence on "Dating apps as health allies? Examining the opportunities and challenges of dating apps as partners in public health" by Garcia-Iglesias et al. Exploring the GP-patient relationship: a historical narration. Stories of chronic illness: exploring qualitative data through poetic transcriptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1