Age-related differences in selective associative memory: implications for responsible remembering.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2023.2249189
Dillon H Murphy, Kara M Hoover, Alan D Castel
{"title":"Age-related differences in selective associative memory: implications for responsible remembering.","authors":"Dillon H Murphy, Kara M Hoover, Alan D Castel","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2023.2249189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While often showing associative memory deficits, there may be instances when older adults selectively remember important associative information. We presented younger and older adults with children they would be hypothetically babysitting, and each child had three preferences: a food they like, a food they dislike, and a food they are allergic to and must avoid. In Experiment 1, all foods associated with each child were simultaneously presented while in Experiments 2 and 3, participants self-regulated their study of the different preferences for each child. We were interested in whether people, particularly older adults who often display associative memory impairments, can prioritize the most important information with consequences for forgetting (i.e., allergies), especially with increased task experience. Overall, compared with younger adults, older adults were better at selectively studying and recalling the children's allergies relative to the other preferences, and these patterns increased with task experience. Together, the present results suggest that both younger and older adults can employ strategies that enhance the recall of important information, illustrating <i>responsible remembering</i>. Specifically, both younger and older adults can learn to self-assess and prioritize the information that they need to remember, and despite memory deficits, older adults can learn to employ strategies that enhance the recall of important information, using metacognition and goal-directed remembering to engage in <i>responsible remembering</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2023.2249189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While often showing associative memory deficits, there may be instances when older adults selectively remember important associative information. We presented younger and older adults with children they would be hypothetically babysitting, and each child had three preferences: a food they like, a food they dislike, and a food they are allergic to and must avoid. In Experiment 1, all foods associated with each child were simultaneously presented while in Experiments 2 and 3, participants self-regulated their study of the different preferences for each child. We were interested in whether people, particularly older adults who often display associative memory impairments, can prioritize the most important information with consequences for forgetting (i.e., allergies), especially with increased task experience. Overall, compared with younger adults, older adults were better at selectively studying and recalling the children's allergies relative to the other preferences, and these patterns increased with task experience. Together, the present results suggest that both younger and older adults can employ strategies that enhance the recall of important information, illustrating responsible remembering. Specifically, both younger and older adults can learn to self-assess and prioritize the information that they need to remember, and despite memory deficits, older adults can learn to employ strategies that enhance the recall of important information, using metacognition and goal-directed remembering to engage in responsible remembering.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性联想记忆中与年龄有关的差异:对责任记忆的影响。
虽然老年人经常表现出联想记忆障碍,但在某些情况下,他们可能会选择性地记住重要的联想信息。我们向年轻人和老年人展示了他们假定要照看的孩子,每个孩子都有三种偏好:他们喜欢的食物、他们不喜欢的食物以及他们过敏且必须避免的食物。在实验 1 中,与每个孩子相关的所有食物都会同时出现,而在实验 2 和 3 中,参与者会自我调节对每个孩子不同偏好的研究。我们感兴趣的是,人,尤其是经常出现联想记忆障碍的老年人,是否能优先选择最重要的信息,并在遗忘(即过敏)时承担后果,尤其是随着任务经验的增加。总体而言,与年轻人相比,老年人在选择性地研究和回忆孩子的过敏症方面优于其他偏好,而且这些模式会随着任务经验的增加而增强。总之,本研究结果表明,无论是年轻人还是老年人,都可以采用一些策略来加强对重要信息的回忆,从而体现出负责任的记忆。具体来说,无论是年轻人还是老年人,都可以学会自我评估并确定需要记忆的信息的优先顺序;尽管存在记忆缺陷,老年人也可以学会运用元认知和目标导向记忆法来进行负责任的记忆,从而增强对重要信息的记忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive components of aging-related increase in word-finding difficulty. Accelerated long-term forgetting: from subjective memory decline to a defined clinical entity. Naturalistic assessments in virtual reality and in real life help resolve the age-prospective memory paradox. Effects of extended practice and unitization on relational memory in older adults and neuropsychological lesion cases. Age differences in spatial memory are mitigated during naturalistic navigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1