Provider and Patient Experiences of Delays in Primary Care During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000380
Kimberly A Muellers, Katerina Andreadis, Jessica S Ancker, Carol R Horowitz, Rainu Kaushal, Jenny J Lin
{"title":"Provider and Patient Experiences of Delays in Primary Care During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Kimberly A Muellers,&nbsp;Katerina Andreadis,&nbsp;Jessica S Ancker,&nbsp;Carol R Horowitz,&nbsp;Rainu Kaushal,&nbsp;Jenny J Lin","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The necessary suspension of nonacute services by healthcare systems early in the COVID-19 pandemic was predicted to cause delays in routine care in the United States, with potentially serious consequences for chronic disease management. However, limited work has examined provider or patient perspectives about care delays and their implications for care quality in future healthcare emergencies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores primary care provider (PCP) and patient experiences with healthcare delays during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PCPs and patients were recruited from four large healthcare systems in three states. Participants underwent semistructured interviews asking about their experiences with primary care and telemedicine. Data were analyzed using interpretive description.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one PCPs and 65 patients participated in interviews. Four main topics were identified: (1) types of care delayed, (2) causes for delays, (3) miscommunication contributing to delays, and (4) patient solutions to unmet care needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both patients and providers reported delays in preventive and routine care early in the pandemic, driven by healthcare system changes and patient concerns about infection risk. Primary care practices should develop plans for care continuity and consider new strategies for assessing care quality for effective chronic disease management in future healthcare system disruptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 3","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The necessary suspension of nonacute services by healthcare systems early in the COVID-19 pandemic was predicted to cause delays in routine care in the United States, with potentially serious consequences for chronic disease management. However, limited work has examined provider or patient perspectives about care delays and their implications for care quality in future healthcare emergencies.

Objective: This study explores primary care provider (PCP) and patient experiences with healthcare delays during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: PCPs and patients were recruited from four large healthcare systems in three states. Participants underwent semistructured interviews asking about their experiences with primary care and telemedicine. Data were analyzed using interpretive description.

Results: Twenty-one PCPs and 65 patients participated in interviews. Four main topics were identified: (1) types of care delayed, (2) causes for delays, (3) miscommunication contributing to delays, and (4) patient solutions to unmet care needs.

Conclusions: Both patients and providers reported delays in preventive and routine care early in the pandemic, driven by healthcare system changes and patient concerns about infection risk. Primary care practices should develop plans for care continuity and consider new strategies for assessing care quality for effective chronic disease management in future healthcare system disruptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行早期初级保健延误的提供者和患者经历
背景:预计在COVID-19大流行早期,医疗保健系统必要的非急性服务暂停会导致美国常规护理的延误,对慢性病管理可能产生严重后果。然而,有限的工作已经检查了提供者或患者关于护理延误的观点及其对未来医疗紧急情况护理质量的影响。目的:本研究探讨了COVID-19大流行期间初级保健提供者(PCP)和患者的医疗延误经历。方法:从三个州的四个大型医疗保健系统中招募pcp和患者。参与者接受了半结构化访谈,询问他们在初级保健和远程医疗方面的经验。数据分析采用解释性描述。结果:21名pcp和65名患者参与了访谈。确定了四个主要主题:(1)延迟护理的类型,(2)延迟的原因,(3)导致延迟的沟通不端,以及(4)未满足护理需求的患者解决方案。结论:在大流行早期,由于卫生保健系统的变化和患者对感染风险的担忧,患者和提供者都报告了预防和常规护理的延误。初级保健实践应制定护理连续性计划,并考虑在未来卫生保健系统中断时评估有效慢性病管理的护理质量的新战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Process-Focused Approach to Reduce Central Line Bloodstream Infections in the Pediatric Population. Using Broken Windows Theory to Examine Flow Disruptions in Surgical Care: A Multispecialty Comparison. A Composite Score Reflecting an Initiative to Reduce Harm, Protect Patients, and Promote Safety. Personalizing Quality Improvement: Addressing Anticoagulation Gaps in Atrial Fibrillation. Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1