Clinicians' preferences and attitudes towards the use of lithium in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders around the world: a survey from the ISBD Lithium task force.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Bipolar Disorders Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI:10.1186/s40345-023-00301-y
Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei, Tim Mantingh, Xavier Pérez de Mendiola, Ludovic Samalin, Juan Undurraga, Sergio Strejilevich, Emanuel Severus, Michael Bauer, Ana González-Pinto, Willem A Nolen, Allan H Young, Eduard Vieta
{"title":"Clinicians' preferences and attitudes towards the use of lithium in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders around the world: a survey from the ISBD Lithium task force.","authors":"Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei,&nbsp;Tim Mantingh,&nbsp;Xavier Pérez de Mendiola,&nbsp;Ludovic Samalin,&nbsp;Juan Undurraga,&nbsp;Sergio Strejilevich,&nbsp;Emanuel Severus,&nbsp;Michael Bauer,&nbsp;Ana González-Pinto,&nbsp;Willem A Nolen,&nbsp;Allan H Young,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta","doi":"10.1186/s40345-023-00301-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lithium has long been considered the gold-standard pharmacological treatment for the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders (BD) which is supported by a wide body of evidence. Prior research has shown a steady decline in lithium prescriptions during the last two decades. We aim to identify potential factors explaining this decline across the world with an anonymous worldwide survey developed by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force \"Role of Lithium in Bipolar Disorders\" and distributed by diverse academic and professional international channels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 886 responses were received of which 606 completed the entire questionnaire while 206 completed it partially. Respondents were from 43 different countries comprising all continents. Lithium was the most preferred treatment option for the maintenance of BD patients (59%). The most relevant clinical circumstances in which lithium was the preferred option were in patients with BD I (53%), a family history of response (18%), and a prior response during acute treatment (17%). In contrast, Lithium was not the preferred option in case of patients´ negative beliefs and/or attitudes towards lithium (13%), acute side-effects or tolerability problems (10%) and intoxication risk (8%). Clinicians were less likely to prefer lithium as a first option in BD maintenance phase when practising in developing economy countries [X2 (1, N = 430) = 9465, p = 0.002) ] and private sectors [X2 (1, N = 434) = 8191, p = 0.004)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians' preferences and attitudes towards the use of lithium in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders appear to be affected by both the patients' beliefs and the professional contexts where clinicians provide their services. More research involving patients is needed for identifying their attitudes toward lithium and factors affecting its use, particularly in developing economies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","volume":"11 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220344/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-023-00301-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Lithium has long been considered the gold-standard pharmacological treatment for the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders (BD) which is supported by a wide body of evidence. Prior research has shown a steady decline in lithium prescriptions during the last two decades. We aim to identify potential factors explaining this decline across the world with an anonymous worldwide survey developed by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force "Role of Lithium in Bipolar Disorders" and distributed by diverse academic and professional international channels.

Results: A total of 886 responses were received of which 606 completed the entire questionnaire while 206 completed it partially. Respondents were from 43 different countries comprising all continents. Lithium was the most preferred treatment option for the maintenance of BD patients (59%). The most relevant clinical circumstances in which lithium was the preferred option were in patients with BD I (53%), a family history of response (18%), and a prior response during acute treatment (17%). In contrast, Lithium was not the preferred option in case of patients´ negative beliefs and/or attitudes towards lithium (13%), acute side-effects or tolerability problems (10%) and intoxication risk (8%). Clinicians were less likely to prefer lithium as a first option in BD maintenance phase when practising in developing economy countries [X2 (1, N = 430) = 9465, p = 0.002) ] and private sectors [X2 (1, N = 434) = 8191, p = 0.004)].

Conclusions: Clinicians' preferences and attitudes towards the use of lithium in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders appear to be affected by both the patients' beliefs and the professional contexts where clinicians provide their services. More research involving patients is needed for identifying their attitudes toward lithium and factors affecting its use, particularly in developing economies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生对在双相情感障碍维持治疗中使用锂的偏好和态度:来自ISBD锂工作组的一项调查。
背景:长期以来,锂一直被认为是双相情感障碍(BD)维持治疗的金标准药物治疗,这得到了广泛证据的支持。先前的研究表明,在过去的二十年里,锂的处方在稳步下降。我们的目标是通过国际双相情感障碍协会(ISBD)特别工作组“锂在双相情感障碍中的作用”开展的一项匿名全球调查,确定解释全球范围内这种下降的潜在因素,并通过各种学术和专业国际渠道分发。结果:共收到问卷886份,其中完整填写问卷606份,部分填写问卷206份。受访者来自各大洲的43个不同国家。锂是BD患者最首选的治疗方案(59%)。与首选锂盐治疗最相关的临床情况是:BD I患者(53%)、有反应家族史(18%)和急性治疗期间有反应(17%)。相比之下,在患者对锂的负面信念和/或态度(13%),急性副作用或耐受性问题(10%)和中毒风险(8%)的情况下,锂不是首选。在发展中国家[X2 (1, N = 430) = 9465, p = 0.002]和私营部门[X2 (1, N = 434) = 8191, p = 0.004]执业时,临床医生不太可能选择锂作为BD维持阶段的第一选择。结论:临床医生对在双相情感障碍维持治疗中使用锂的偏好和态度似乎受到患者信念和临床医生提供服务的专业背景的影响。需要对患者进行更多的研究,以确定他们对锂的态度以及影响其使用的因素,特别是在发展中经济体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bipolar Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. It publishes contributions from the broad range of clinical, psychological and biological research in bipolar disorders. It is the official journal of the ECNP-ENBREC (European Network of Bipolar Research Expert Centres ) Bipolar Disorders Network, the International Group for the study of Lithium Treated Patients (IGSLi) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen (DGBS) and invites clinicians and researchers from around the globe to submit original research papers, short research communications, reviews, guidelines, case reports and letters to the editor that help to enhance understanding of bipolar disorders.
期刊最新文献
Search for surrogate markers to predict end stage kidney disease in long term lithium users. Brain 18FDG-PET pattern in cognitively impaired elderly patients with bipolar disorder. Dynamics of affect modulation in neurodevelopmental disorders (DynAMoND) - study design of a prospective cohort study. Association between a large change between the minimum and maximum monthly values of solar insolation and a history of suicide attempts in bipolar I disorder. Machine learning-driven simplification of the hypomania checklist-32 for adolescent: a feature selection approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1