Efficacy of Animal-Assisted Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Trial.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma Nursing Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000705
Leslie Horton, Margaret Griffen, Lui Chang, Anna B Newcomb
{"title":"Efficacy of Animal-Assisted Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Leslie Horton,&nbsp;Margaret Griffen,&nbsp;Lui Chang,&nbsp;Anna B Newcomb","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe traumatic brain injury carries major public health consequences, with patients suffering long-term disability with physiological, cognitive, and behavioral changes. Animal-assisted therapy, the use of human and animal bonds in goal-directed interventions, has been a suggested therapy, but its efficacy in acute brain injury outcomes remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess animal-assisted therapy's effects on cognitive outcome scores of hospitalized severe traumatic brain-injured patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, randomized, prospective trial was conducted from 2017 to 2019 and examined the effects of canine animal-assisted therapy on the Glasgow Coma Scale, Rancho Los Amigo Scale, and Levels of Command of adult severe traumatic brain-injured patients. Patients were randomized to receive animal-assisted therapy or usual standard of care. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to study group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study patients (N = 70) received 151 sessions with a hander and dog (intervention, n = 38) and 156 without (control, n = 32) from a total of 25 dogs and nine handlers. When comparing the patients' response during hospitalization to animal-assisted therapy versus control, we controlled for sex, age, baseline Injury Severity Score, and corresponding enrollment score. Although there was no significant change in Glasgow Coma Score (p = .155), patients in the animal-assisted therapy group reported significantly higher standardized change in Rancho Los Amigo Scale (p = .026) and change commands (p < .001) compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with traumatic brain injury receiving canine-assisted therapy demonstrated significant improvement compared with a control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":"30 2","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe traumatic brain injury carries major public health consequences, with patients suffering long-term disability with physiological, cognitive, and behavioral changes. Animal-assisted therapy, the use of human and animal bonds in goal-directed interventions, has been a suggested therapy, but its efficacy in acute brain injury outcomes remains unknown.

Objective: This study aimed to assess animal-assisted therapy's effects on cognitive outcome scores of hospitalized severe traumatic brain-injured patients.

Methods: This single-center, randomized, prospective trial was conducted from 2017 to 2019 and examined the effects of canine animal-assisted therapy on the Glasgow Coma Scale, Rancho Los Amigo Scale, and Levels of Command of adult severe traumatic brain-injured patients. Patients were randomized to receive animal-assisted therapy or usual standard of care. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to study group differences.

Results: Study patients (N = 70) received 151 sessions with a hander and dog (intervention, n = 38) and 156 without (control, n = 32) from a total of 25 dogs and nine handlers. When comparing the patients' response during hospitalization to animal-assisted therapy versus control, we controlled for sex, age, baseline Injury Severity Score, and corresponding enrollment score. Although there was no significant change in Glasgow Coma Score (p = .155), patients in the animal-assisted therapy group reported significantly higher standardized change in Rancho Los Amigo Scale (p = .026) and change commands (p < .001) compared with the control group.

Conclusions: Patients with traumatic brain injury receiving canine-assisted therapy demonstrated significant improvement compared with a control group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动物辅助疗法治疗创伤性脑损伤患者的疗效:一项随机试验。
背景:严重的外伤性脑损伤具有重大的公共卫生后果,患者长期残疾,伴有生理、认知和行为改变。动物辅助治疗,即在目标导向干预中使用人与动物的结合,是一种建议的治疗方法,但其对急性脑损伤结果的疗效尚不清楚。目的:探讨动物辅助治疗对重型颅脑损伤住院患者认知结局评分的影响。方法:本研究于2017 - 2019年进行单中心、随机、前瞻性试验,研究犬类动物辅助治疗对成人重型颅脑损伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表、兰乔·洛斯阿米戈量表和指挥水平的影响。患者随机接受动物辅助治疗或常规标准治疗。采用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验来研究组间差异。结果:研究患者(N = 70)从25只狗和9名训导员中接受了151次有训导员和狗(干预,N = 38)和156次没有(对照组,N = 32)。当比较患者在住院期间对动物辅助治疗的反应与对照组时,我们控制了性别、年龄、基线损伤严重程度评分和相应的入组评分。虽然格拉斯哥昏迷评分没有显著变化(p = .155),但与对照组相比,动物辅助治疗组患者在Rancho Los Amigo量表(p = .026)和改变命令(p < .001)方面的标准化变化明显更高。结论:与对照组相比,接受犬辅助治疗的创伤性脑损伤患者表现出显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.​ The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.
期刊最新文献
Acellular Dermal Matrices in Reconstructive Pediatric Complex Lower Limb Trauma: An Observational Study. Experiences of Nurse Managers in the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquakes: A Qualitative Study. A Brief Intervention for Injury-Related Traumatic Stress: Results From a Feasibility Study. A Brief Intervention for Injury-Related Traumatic Stress: Results From a Feasibility Study. Gender-Based Analysis of Injury Types and Risk Factors in Professional Tennis Players - Insights for Prevention: A Concise Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1