Efficacy of Animal-Assisted Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Trial.

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000705
Leslie Horton, Margaret Griffen, Lui Chang, Anna B Newcomb
{"title":"Efficacy of Animal-Assisted Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Leslie Horton,&nbsp;Margaret Griffen,&nbsp;Lui Chang,&nbsp;Anna B Newcomb","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe traumatic brain injury carries major public health consequences, with patients suffering long-term disability with physiological, cognitive, and behavioral changes. Animal-assisted therapy, the use of human and animal bonds in goal-directed interventions, has been a suggested therapy, but its efficacy in acute brain injury outcomes remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess animal-assisted therapy's effects on cognitive outcome scores of hospitalized severe traumatic brain-injured patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, randomized, prospective trial was conducted from 2017 to 2019 and examined the effects of canine animal-assisted therapy on the Glasgow Coma Scale, Rancho Los Amigo Scale, and Levels of Command of adult severe traumatic brain-injured patients. Patients were randomized to receive animal-assisted therapy or usual standard of care. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to study group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study patients (N = 70) received 151 sessions with a hander and dog (intervention, n = 38) and 156 without (control, n = 32) from a total of 25 dogs and nine handlers. When comparing the patients' response during hospitalization to animal-assisted therapy versus control, we controlled for sex, age, baseline Injury Severity Score, and corresponding enrollment score. Although there was no significant change in Glasgow Coma Score (p = .155), patients in the animal-assisted therapy group reported significantly higher standardized change in Rancho Los Amigo Scale (p = .026) and change commands (p < .001) compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with traumatic brain injury receiving canine-assisted therapy demonstrated significant improvement compared with a control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"30 2","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe traumatic brain injury carries major public health consequences, with patients suffering long-term disability with physiological, cognitive, and behavioral changes. Animal-assisted therapy, the use of human and animal bonds in goal-directed interventions, has been a suggested therapy, but its efficacy in acute brain injury outcomes remains unknown.

Objective: This study aimed to assess animal-assisted therapy's effects on cognitive outcome scores of hospitalized severe traumatic brain-injured patients.

Methods: This single-center, randomized, prospective trial was conducted from 2017 to 2019 and examined the effects of canine animal-assisted therapy on the Glasgow Coma Scale, Rancho Los Amigo Scale, and Levels of Command of adult severe traumatic brain-injured patients. Patients were randomized to receive animal-assisted therapy or usual standard of care. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to study group differences.

Results: Study patients (N = 70) received 151 sessions with a hander and dog (intervention, n = 38) and 156 without (control, n = 32) from a total of 25 dogs and nine handlers. When comparing the patients' response during hospitalization to animal-assisted therapy versus control, we controlled for sex, age, baseline Injury Severity Score, and corresponding enrollment score. Although there was no significant change in Glasgow Coma Score (p = .155), patients in the animal-assisted therapy group reported significantly higher standardized change in Rancho Los Amigo Scale (p = .026) and change commands (p < .001) compared with the control group.

Conclusions: Patients with traumatic brain injury receiving canine-assisted therapy demonstrated significant improvement compared with a control group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
动物辅助疗法治疗创伤性脑损伤患者的疗效:一项随机试验。
背景:严重的外伤性脑损伤具有重大的公共卫生后果,患者长期残疾,伴有生理、认知和行为改变。动物辅助治疗,即在目标导向干预中使用人与动物的结合,是一种建议的治疗方法,但其对急性脑损伤结果的疗效尚不清楚。目的:探讨动物辅助治疗对重型颅脑损伤住院患者认知结局评分的影响。方法:本研究于2017 - 2019年进行单中心、随机、前瞻性试验,研究犬类动物辅助治疗对成人重型颅脑损伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表、兰乔·洛斯阿米戈量表和指挥水平的影响。患者随机接受动物辅助治疗或常规标准治疗。采用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验来研究组间差异。结果:研究患者(N = 70)从25只狗和9名训导员中接受了151次有训导员和狗(干预,N = 38)和156次没有(对照组,N = 32)。当比较患者在住院期间对动物辅助治疗的反应与对照组时,我们控制了性别、年龄、基线损伤严重程度评分和相应的入组评分。虽然格拉斯哥昏迷评分没有显著变化(p = .155),但与对照组相比,动物辅助治疗组患者在Rancho Los Amigo量表(p = .026)和改变命令(p < .001)方面的标准化变化明显更高。结论:与对照组相比,接受犬辅助治疗的创伤性脑损伤患者表现出显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1