Anatomical measurements of trigeminal ganglion: a cadaver study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Anatomical Science International Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s12565-023-00740-8
Xiang Zhang, Yong Bai, Jianfei Hou, Wenbin Chen, Kailiang Cheng, Longjin Zi, Ping Wang
{"title":"Anatomical measurements of trigeminal ganglion: a cadaver study","authors":"Xiang Zhang,&nbsp;Yong Bai,&nbsp;Jianfei Hou,&nbsp;Wenbin Chen,&nbsp;Kailiang Cheng,&nbsp;Longjin Zi,&nbsp;Ping Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12565-023-00740-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is difficult to obtain specific information regarding the trigeminal ganglion (TG), especially pediatric TG. The aim of present study was to determine the parameters of the TG and assist in the neuroablative treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Thirty-seven sides of cadaver heads that had undergone gross anatomical examination were included, with 29 sides of adults and 8 sides of infants. The distance and angles were measured among 12 points, with nine points adjacent to the TG and three points on the foramen ovale (FO). The three points on FO were represented as three different surgical approaches for TN: posterior FO approach (PFO), lateral FO approach (LFO), and anterior FO approach (AFO). A high similarity was found in pediatric TG. No statistical difference was detected in either the distance or the angles between the 12 points. Statistical difference was found in adult heads in some of the distances, which included PFO to point 5 (17.97 ± 3.35 mm in the left and 15.52 ± 2.28 mm in the right; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and LFO to point 5 and point 8. Moreover, the angle for PFO to point 5 showed a statistically significant difference (60.10 ± 14.02 in the left and 46.63 ± 10.48 in the right; <i>p</i> = 0.01). These findings revealed that surgical neuroablation for patients with TN should be performed more carefully when the PFO or LFO approach is adopted, with a precise preoperative evaluation to avoid corneal complications. Two safety radiofrequency rhizotomy points are also presented to deal with two different kinds of TN.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7816,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Science International","volume":"99 1","pages":"98 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Science International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12565-023-00740-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is difficult to obtain specific information regarding the trigeminal ganglion (TG), especially pediatric TG. The aim of present study was to determine the parameters of the TG and assist in the neuroablative treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Thirty-seven sides of cadaver heads that had undergone gross anatomical examination were included, with 29 sides of adults and 8 sides of infants. The distance and angles were measured among 12 points, with nine points adjacent to the TG and three points on the foramen ovale (FO). The three points on FO were represented as three different surgical approaches for TN: posterior FO approach (PFO), lateral FO approach (LFO), and anterior FO approach (AFO). A high similarity was found in pediatric TG. No statistical difference was detected in either the distance or the angles between the 12 points. Statistical difference was found in adult heads in some of the distances, which included PFO to point 5 (17.97 ± 3.35 mm in the left and 15.52 ± 2.28 mm in the right; p = 0.03) and LFO to point 5 and point 8. Moreover, the angle for PFO to point 5 showed a statistically significant difference (60.10 ± 14.02 in the left and 46.63 ± 10.48 in the right; p = 0.01). These findings revealed that surgical neuroablation for patients with TN should be performed more carefully when the PFO or LFO approach is adopted, with a precise preoperative evaluation to avoid corneal complications. Two safety radiofrequency rhizotomy points are also presented to deal with two different kinds of TN.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三叉神经节的解剖测量:尸体研究。
很难获得有关三叉神经节(TG),尤其是小儿三叉神经节的具体信息。本研究旨在确定三叉神经节的参数,并协助三叉神经痛(TN)的神经消融治疗。研究对象包括 37 侧经过解剖学检查的尸体头部,其中 29 侧为成人,8 侧为婴儿。测量了 12 个点之间的距离和角度,其中 9 个点位于 TG 附近,3 个点位于卵圆孔(FO)上。卵圆孔上的三个点代表了 TN 的三种不同手术方法:卵圆孔后入路(PFO)、卵圆孔侧入路(LFO)和卵圆孔前入路(AFO)。在小儿 TG 中发现了高度的相似性。12 个点之间的距离或角度均未发现统计学差异。成人头颅在某些距离上发现了统计学差异,其中包括 PFO 至第 5 点(左侧为 17.97 ± 3.35 毫米,右侧为 15.52 ± 2.28 毫米;p = 0.03)以及 LFO 至第 5 点和第 8 点。此外,PFO 至第 5 点的角度显示出显著的统计学差异(左侧为 60.10 ± 14.02,右侧为 46.63 ± 10.48;P = 0.01)。这些研究结果表明,在采用 PFO 或 LFO 方法对 TN 患者进行手术神经消融时应更加谨慎,并进行精确的术前评估,以避免角膜并发症。本文还介绍了两种安全的射频根切点,以应对两种不同类型的 TN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Science International
Anatomical Science International 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official English journal of the Japanese Association of Anatomists, Anatomical Science International (formerly titled Kaibogaku Zasshi) publishes original research articles dealing with morphological sciences. Coverage in the journal includes molecular, cellular, histological and gross anatomical studies on humans and on normal and experimental animals, as well as functional morphological, biochemical, physiological and behavioral studies if they include morphological analysis.
期刊最新文献
Variant anatomy of the iliac veins and presence of two venous rings around the arteries in the pelvis. Regulatory mechanisms governing GLI proteins in hedgehog signaling. Envisioning the future of ASI: reflections on the 100th anniversary. Unilateral two-headed extensor digitorum longus muscle: atypical configuration and clinical implications. The anatomy of the common iliac artery: a meta-analysis based on 5785 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1