Predictors of Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation in Critically Ill Children.

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1731433
Alyson K Baker, Andrew L Beardsley, Brian D Leland, Elizabeth A Moser, Riad L Lutfi, A Ioana Cristea, Courtney M Rowan
{"title":"Predictors of Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation in Critically Ill Children.","authors":"Alyson K Baker,&nbsp;Andrew L Beardsley,&nbsp;Brian D Leland,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Moser,&nbsp;Riad L Lutfi,&nbsp;A Ioana Cristea,&nbsp;Courtney M Rowan","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is a common modality employed to treat acute respiratory failure. Most data guiding its use is extrapolated from adult studies. We sought to identify clinical predictors associated with failure of NIV, defined as requiring intubation. This single-center retrospective observational study included children admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between July 2014 and June 2016 treated with NIV, excluding postextubation. A total of 148 patients was included. Twenty-seven (18%) failed NIV. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to age, gender, comorbidities, or etiology of acute respiratory failure. Those that failed had higher admission pediatric risk of mortality ( <i>p</i>  = 0.01) and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction ( <i>p</i>  = 0.002) scores and higher fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO <sub>2</sub> ; <i>p</i>  = 0.009) at NIV initiation. Failure was associated with lack of improvement in tachypnea. At 6 hours of NIV, the failure group had worsening tachypnea with a median increase in respiratory rate of 8%, while the success group had a median reduction of 18% ( <i>p</i>  = 0.06). Multivariable Cox's proportional hazard models revealed FiO <sub>2</sub> at initiation and worsening respiratory rate at 1- and 6-hour significant risks for failure of NIV. Failure was associated with a significantly longer PICU length of stay (success [2.8 days interquartile range (IQR): 1.7, 5.5] vs. failure [10.6 days IQR: 5.6, 13.2], <i>p</i>  < 0.001). NIV can be successfully employed to treat acute respiratory failure in pediatric patients. There should be heightened concern for NIV failure in hypoxemic patients whose tachypnea is unresponsive to NIV. A trend toward improvement should be closely monitored.</p>","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411242/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1731433.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is a common modality employed to treat acute respiratory failure. Most data guiding its use is extrapolated from adult studies. We sought to identify clinical predictors associated with failure of NIV, defined as requiring intubation. This single-center retrospective observational study included children admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between July 2014 and June 2016 treated with NIV, excluding postextubation. A total of 148 patients was included. Twenty-seven (18%) failed NIV. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to age, gender, comorbidities, or etiology of acute respiratory failure. Those that failed had higher admission pediatric risk of mortality ( p  = 0.01) and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction ( p  = 0.002) scores and higher fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ; p  = 0.009) at NIV initiation. Failure was associated with lack of improvement in tachypnea. At 6 hours of NIV, the failure group had worsening tachypnea with a median increase in respiratory rate of 8%, while the success group had a median reduction of 18% ( p  = 0.06). Multivariable Cox's proportional hazard models revealed FiO 2 at initiation and worsening respiratory rate at 1- and 6-hour significant risks for failure of NIV. Failure was associated with a significantly longer PICU length of stay (success [2.8 days interquartile range (IQR): 1.7, 5.5] vs. failure [10.6 days IQR: 5.6, 13.2], p  < 0.001). NIV can be successfully employed to treat acute respiratory failure in pediatric patients. There should be heightened concern for NIV failure in hypoxemic patients whose tachypnea is unresponsive to NIV. A trend toward improvement should be closely monitored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重儿童无创通气失败的预测因素。
无创通气(NIV)是治疗急性呼吸衰竭的常用方法。大多数指导其使用的数据都是从成人研究中推断出来的。我们试图确定与NIV失败相关的临床预测因素,定义为需要插管。这项单中心回顾性观察性研究纳入了2014年7月至2016年6月期间在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)接受NIV治疗的儿童,拔管后除外。共纳入148例患者。27例(18%)NIV失败。两组在年龄、性别、合并症或急性呼吸衰竭的病因方面没有差异。失败患者的住院儿童死亡风险(p = 0.01)和儿童逻辑器官功能障碍(p = 0.002)评分较高,吸入氧(FiO 2;p = 0.009)。治疗失败与呼吸急促缺乏改善有关。在NIV 6小时,失败组呼吸急促加重,呼吸率中位数增加8%,而成功组呼吸率中位数减少18% (p = 0.06)。多变量Cox比例风险模型显示,开始时的FiO 2和1小时和6小时呼吸速率恶化是NIV失败的显著风险。失败与PICU住院时间明显延长相关(成功[2.8天四分位数间距(IQR): 1.7, 5.5]与失败[10.6天IQR: 5.6, 13.2], p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Harms Associated with Tracheal Reintubation After Unplanned Extubation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Scores in Children who Received Early Life Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit “It Would Be All-Consuming”: Community Parents' Perceptions of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Bupropion Cardiotoxicity Social Disadvantage and Inequity in Access to Pediatric Critical Care Services for Children Living Remote from a Children's Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1