Outcomes in occupational therapy students' preparation for wheelchair skills training provision.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-03-03 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1080/10400435.2023.2235594
Edward Giesbrecht
{"title":"Outcomes in occupational therapy students' preparation for wheelchair skills training provision.","authors":"Edward Giesbrecht","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2023.2235594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While wheelchair skills training has demonstrated highly effective outcomes for wheelchair users, prevalence of receiving comprehensive skills training is low. Studies demonstrate a wheelchair skills \"bootcamp\" significantly improves occupational therapy students' capacity to demonstrate wheelchair skill performance; however, how bootcamps impact students' self-efficacy to deliver skills training in future clinical practice is unclear. This study explored a large dataset collected from nine successive student cohorts attending a structured wheelchair skills bootcamp at a single site. Bootcamps were 4-4.5 hours in duration and content was based on the Wheelchair Skills Program. Mean improvement in skill capacity was 34.8% (95% CI 33.5; 36.1) and wheelchair self-efficacy improved by 28.7% (95% CI 27.3; 30.1). Post-bootcamp self-efficacy scores for Assessment (80.9%), Training (78.5%), Spotting (87.4%), and Documentation (70.4%) all improved by 30-40%. Mandatory bootcamps had lower baseline scores but similar post-bootcamp and change scores as voluntary ones. Cohorts during the COVID-19 pandemic had significantly lower baseline scores for wheelchair skill capacity and confidence as well as self-efficacy with assessment, but significantly larger improvements post-bootcamp. An experiential bootcamp is effective across a wide range of occupational therapy student cohorts in preparing them to deliver wheelchair skills training in future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2023.2235594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While wheelchair skills training has demonstrated highly effective outcomes for wheelchair users, prevalence of receiving comprehensive skills training is low. Studies demonstrate a wheelchair skills "bootcamp" significantly improves occupational therapy students' capacity to demonstrate wheelchair skill performance; however, how bootcamps impact students' self-efficacy to deliver skills training in future clinical practice is unclear. This study explored a large dataset collected from nine successive student cohorts attending a structured wheelchair skills bootcamp at a single site. Bootcamps were 4-4.5 hours in duration and content was based on the Wheelchair Skills Program. Mean improvement in skill capacity was 34.8% (95% CI 33.5; 36.1) and wheelchair self-efficacy improved by 28.7% (95% CI 27.3; 30.1). Post-bootcamp self-efficacy scores for Assessment (80.9%), Training (78.5%), Spotting (87.4%), and Documentation (70.4%) all improved by 30-40%. Mandatory bootcamps had lower baseline scores but similar post-bootcamp and change scores as voluntary ones. Cohorts during the COVID-19 pandemic had significantly lower baseline scores for wheelchair skill capacity and confidence as well as self-efficacy with assessment, but significantly larger improvements post-bootcamp. An experiential bootcamp is effective across a wide range of occupational therapy student cohorts in preparing them to deliver wheelchair skills training in future clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业治疗专业学生准备轮椅技能培训的成果。
虽然轮椅技能培训已证明对轮椅使用者非常有效,但接受全面技能培训的普及率却很低。研究表明,轮椅技能 "训练营 "能显著提高职业治疗专业学生展示轮椅技能的能力;然而,训练营如何影响学生在未来临床实践中进行技能培训的自我效能尚不清楚。本研究探索了一个大型数据集,该数据集收集自在一个地点连续参加结构化轮椅技能训练营的九届学生。训练营为期 4-4.5 小时,内容基于轮椅技能计划。技能能力平均提高了 34.8% (95% CI 33.5; 36.1),轮椅自我效能感提高了 28.7% (95% CI 27.3; 30.1)。训练营结束后,评估(80.9%)、训练(78.5%)、发现(87.4%)和记录(70.4%)的自我效能得分均提高了 30-40%。强制训练营的基线分数较低,但训练营后的分数和变化分数与自愿训练营相似。在 COVID-19 大流行期间参加训练营的学员在轮椅技能能力和自信心以及评估自我效能方面的基线分数明显较低,但在训练营结束后却有显著提高。体验式训练营能有效地帮助各类职业治疗学生为在未来的临床实践中提供轮椅技能培训做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
期刊最新文献
Addressing visual impairments: Essential software requirements for image caption solutions. Development and preliminary evaluation of a grid design application for adults and children using scanning and bci-based augmentative and alternative communication. Technology-assisted instruction with teacher prompts on fraction multiplication word problems: A single-case design with visual analysis and Bayesian multilevel modeling. Program evaluation and healthcare process improvement focused on complex wheelchair procurement. RESNA and CTF position on the application of supported standing devices: Current state of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1