Semantic fluency in primary school-age children with vision impairment.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1080/17549507.2023.2214711
Jessica Hayton, Jessica Marshall, Helen Girvan, Chloe Marshall
{"title":"Semantic fluency in primary school-age children with vision impairment.","authors":"Jessica Hayton, Jessica Marshall, Helen Girvan, Chloe Marshall","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2023.2214711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Semantic fluency is potentially a useful tool for vocabulary assessment in children with vision impairment because it contains no visual test stimuli. It is not known whether in the primary school years children with vision impairment perform more poorly on semantic fluency tasks compared to their sighted peers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We compared semantic fluency performance of two groups of 5- to 11-year-old British English speaking children-one group with vision impairment and one without. We also investigated within-group differences in performance, based on severity of vision impairment. We administered one category (animals) to children with vision impairment (<i>n</i> = 45) and sighted children (<i>n</i> = 30). Participants had one minute to respond. Responses were coded for accuracy, error type, clusters, and switches.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Correct responses increased with age within each group. Groups did not differ significantly on any outcome measure. Severity of vision impairment did not impact task performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggested that semantic fluency performance-at least for the category animals-is not different in children with vision impairment compared to sighted children. Findings also suggest that semantic fluency could be a suitable addition to the tools that speech-language pathologists use to assess language abilities in children with vision impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"257-266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2023.2214711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Semantic fluency is potentially a useful tool for vocabulary assessment in children with vision impairment because it contains no visual test stimuli. It is not known whether in the primary school years children with vision impairment perform more poorly on semantic fluency tasks compared to their sighted peers.

Method: We compared semantic fluency performance of two groups of 5- to 11-year-old British English speaking children-one group with vision impairment and one without. We also investigated within-group differences in performance, based on severity of vision impairment. We administered one category (animals) to children with vision impairment (n = 45) and sighted children (n = 30). Participants had one minute to respond. Responses were coded for accuracy, error type, clusters, and switches.

Result: Correct responses increased with age within each group. Groups did not differ significantly on any outcome measure. Severity of vision impairment did not impact task performance.

Conclusion: Results suggested that semantic fluency performance-at least for the category animals-is not different in children with vision impairment compared to sighted children. Findings also suggest that semantic fluency could be a suitable addition to the tools that speech-language pathologists use to assess language abilities in children with vision impairment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有视力障碍的小学学龄儿童的语义流畅性。
目的:语义流畅性是评估视力障碍儿童词汇量的潜在有用工具,因为它不包含视觉测试刺激。与视力正常的同龄人相比,视力障碍儿童在小学阶段的语义流畅性任务中是否表现更差,目前尚不清楚:我们比较了两组 5-11 岁英国英语儿童的语义流利性表现,一组有视力障碍,另一组没有。我们还根据视力障碍的严重程度调查了组内的表现差异。我们分别对视力受损儿童(45 人)和视力正常儿童(30 人)进行了一个类别(动物)的测试。参与者有一分钟的回答时间。我们对回答的准确性、错误类型、群组和开关进行了编码:结果:在每个组别中,正确率随着年龄的增长而提高。各组在任何结果测量上都没有明显差异。视力障碍的严重程度对任务表现没有影响:结果表明,视力受损儿童的语义流畅性表现--至少在动物类别上--与视力正常儿童相比没有差异。研究结果还表明,语义流畅性可以作为语言病理学家用来评估视力障碍儿童语言能力的工具的适当补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the parent experience of echolalia in autism spectrum disorder onto a conceptual taxonomy. Using a novel in-mask non-invasive ventilator microphone to improve talker intelligibility in healthy and hospitalised adults. An online survey of clinical practice and confidence in diagnosing acquired apraxia of speech in Cantonese speakers. The PraxiFala Battery: A diagnostic accuracy study. Sex differences in perceived speech intelligibility in patients with facial nerve palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1