[Detection rate and clinical characteristics of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion].

L Zhang, Y P Xiao, X Tao, Y K Cao, L Sui, Q Cong
{"title":"[Detection rate and clinical characteristics of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion].","authors":"L Zhang,&nbsp;Y P Xiao,&nbsp;X Tao,&nbsp;Y K Cao,&nbsp;L Sui,&nbsp;Q Cong","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20230607-00255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the detection rate, clinical characteristics of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). <b>Methods:</b> Women diagnosed with vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) through colposcopy-guided biopsy from January 1, 2018 to August 31, 2022 in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were included in a 1∶1 ratio with patients diagnosed with vulvar low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) during the same period. Clinical characteristics including human papillomavirus (HPV) infection rate, genotype, cytology result, colposcopy impression, and lesion location were retrospectively analyzed. <b>Results:</b> (1) The proportion of vulvar SIL detected by colposcopy-guided biopsy increased annually from 2018 to 2022, with rates of 1.64% (740/45 057), 2.34% (1 110/47 402), 2.68% (1 108/41 335), 3.26% (1 536/47 078), 3.31% (667/20 155), with an average rate of 2.57% (5 161/201 027). (2) A total of 1 096 cases of vulvar HSIL and 1 096 cases of vulvar LSIL were included. The overall infection rate of HPV was 92.7% (1 993/2 150), with higher infection rate in vulvar HSIL patients than that in vulvar LSIL patients [96.0% (1 012/1 054) vs 89.5% (981/1 096); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=33.62, <i>P</i><0.001]. Among vulvar HSIL patients, the common HPV genotype from high to low were HPV 16 (66.7%), HPV 52 (14.3%), and HPV 58 (10.0%). For vulvar LSIL patients, the most common HPV genotype were respectively HPV 16 (24.9%), HPV 6 (20.1%) and HPV 52 (17.1%). The overall sensitivity rate of cytology was 53.6%, with no significance difference between vulvar LSIL and HSIL groups (54.3% vs 52.9%; <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.40, <i>P</i>=0.526). The accuracy of colposcopy impression for vulvar HSIL was lower than that for vulvar LSIL [40.2% (163/405) vs 81.7% (380/465); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=158.72, <i>P</i><0.001]. About 57.3% (1 257/2 192) of the patients had concomitant cervical and vaginal lesions, with a higher rate in vulvar HSIL group than that in vulvar LSIL group [62.6% (686/1 096) vs 52.1% (571/1 096); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=24.67, <i>P</i><0.001]. Unifocal lesion was the main type, with no significance difference between vulvar LSIL and HSIL groups [81.4% (381/468) vs 82.5% (386/468); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.18, <i>P</i>=0.671]. The most common lesion locations were the posterior commissure, followed by labia minora, vaginal vestibule, labia majora, perianal and clitoris. <b>Conclusions:</b> The detection rate of vulvar SIL under colposcopy is about 3%, and the infection rate of HPV is 92.7%. Vulvar SIL, especially vulvar HSIL, is likely to cause concomitant cervical and vaginal lesions. The accuracy of colposcopy in diagnosing vulvar HSIL is low. Therefore a comprehensive and careful examination of the vulva is necessary and suspicious vulvar lesions should be undergone colposcopy-guided biopsy for diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10050,"journal":{"name":"中华妇产科杂志","volume":"58 8","pages":"603-610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华妇产科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20230607-00255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the detection rate, clinical characteristics of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). Methods: Women diagnosed with vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) through colposcopy-guided biopsy from January 1, 2018 to August 31, 2022 in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were included in a 1∶1 ratio with patients diagnosed with vulvar low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) during the same period. Clinical characteristics including human papillomavirus (HPV) infection rate, genotype, cytology result, colposcopy impression, and lesion location were retrospectively analyzed. Results: (1) The proportion of vulvar SIL detected by colposcopy-guided biopsy increased annually from 2018 to 2022, with rates of 1.64% (740/45 057), 2.34% (1 110/47 402), 2.68% (1 108/41 335), 3.26% (1 536/47 078), 3.31% (667/20 155), with an average rate of 2.57% (5 161/201 027). (2) A total of 1 096 cases of vulvar HSIL and 1 096 cases of vulvar LSIL were included. The overall infection rate of HPV was 92.7% (1 993/2 150), with higher infection rate in vulvar HSIL patients than that in vulvar LSIL patients [96.0% (1 012/1 054) vs 89.5% (981/1 096); χ2=33.62, P<0.001]. Among vulvar HSIL patients, the common HPV genotype from high to low were HPV 16 (66.7%), HPV 52 (14.3%), and HPV 58 (10.0%). For vulvar LSIL patients, the most common HPV genotype were respectively HPV 16 (24.9%), HPV 6 (20.1%) and HPV 52 (17.1%). The overall sensitivity rate of cytology was 53.6%, with no significance difference between vulvar LSIL and HSIL groups (54.3% vs 52.9%; χ2=0.40, P=0.526). The accuracy of colposcopy impression for vulvar HSIL was lower than that for vulvar LSIL [40.2% (163/405) vs 81.7% (380/465); χ2=158.72, P<0.001]. About 57.3% (1 257/2 192) of the patients had concomitant cervical and vaginal lesions, with a higher rate in vulvar HSIL group than that in vulvar LSIL group [62.6% (686/1 096) vs 52.1% (571/1 096); χ2=24.67, P<0.001]. Unifocal lesion was the main type, with no significance difference between vulvar LSIL and HSIL groups [81.4% (381/468) vs 82.5% (386/468); χ2=0.18, P=0.671]. The most common lesion locations were the posterior commissure, followed by labia minora, vaginal vestibule, labia majora, perianal and clitoris. Conclusions: The detection rate of vulvar SIL under colposcopy is about 3%, and the infection rate of HPV is 92.7%. Vulvar SIL, especially vulvar HSIL, is likely to cause concomitant cervical and vaginal lesions. The accuracy of colposcopy in diagnosing vulvar HSIL is low. Therefore a comprehensive and careful examination of the vulva is necessary and suspicious vulvar lesions should be undergone colposcopy-guided biopsy for diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【外阴鳞状上皮内病变的检出率及临床特点】。
目的:探讨外阴鳞状上皮内病变(SIL)的检出率及临床特点。方法:将2018年1月1日至2022年8月31日在复旦大学妇产科医院经阴道镜引导下活检诊断为外阴高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的女性与同期诊断为外阴低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)的患者按1∶1的比例纳入研究。回顾性分析患者的临床特征,包括人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染率、基因型、细胞学检查结果、阴道镜检查印象和病变部位。结果:(1)2018 - 2022年,阴道镜引导下活检外阴SIL检出率逐年上升,检出率分别为1.64%(740/45 057)、2.34%(1 110/47 402)、2.68%(1 108/41 335)、3.26%(1 536/47 078)、3.31%(667/20 155),平均检出率为2.57%(5 161/201 027)。(2)共纳入外阴HSIL 1 096例,外阴LSIL 1 096例。HPV总感染率为92.7%(1 1993 /2 150),外阴HSIL患者的感染率高于外阴LSIL患者(96.0% (1 012/1 054)vs 89.5% (981/1 096);χ2=33.62, pχ2 =0.40, p =0.526)。阴道镜下印模对外阴HSIL的准确率低于外阴LSIL的准确率[40.2%(163/405)对81.7% (380/465)];χ2=158.72, pχ2 =24.67, pχ2 =0.18, p =0.671]。最常见的病变部位为后连合,其次为小阴唇、阴道前庭、大阴唇、肛周和阴蒂。结论:阴道镜下外阴SIL检出率约为3%,HPV感染率为92.7%。外阴SIL,尤其是外阴HSIL,很可能引起宫颈和阴道的并发病变。阴道镜诊断外阴HSIL的准确性较低。因此,对外阴进行全面细致的检查是必要的,可疑的外阴病变应进行阴道镜引导下的活检诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12682
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Analysis of perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with the resolution of placenta previa in the second trimester]. [Clinical effect of secondary LEEP combined with transcervical resection of endocervical tissue for cervical precancerous lesions with positive internal margin after the first LEEP]. [Diagnostic value of prenatal ultrasound screening and analysis of pregnancy outcomes in velamentous umbilical cord insertion]. [Expanded carrier screening for 216 diseases in a cohort of 3 097 healthy Chinese individuals of childbearing age]. [Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of chronic pelvic pain].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1