Rescue Analgesia for Opioid-Dependent Individuals on Opioid Agonist Treatment during Hospitalization: Adherence to Guideline Treatment.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY European Addiction Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1159/000530266
Isabelle Arnet, Kenneth M Dürsteler, Christine Jaiteh, Florian Grossmann, Kurt E Hersberger
{"title":"Rescue Analgesia for Opioid-Dependent Individuals on Opioid Agonist Treatment during Hospitalization: Adherence to Guideline Treatment.","authors":"Isabelle Arnet,&nbsp;Kenneth M Dürsteler,&nbsp;Christine Jaiteh,&nbsp;Florian Grossmann,&nbsp;Kurt E Hersberger","doi":"10.1159/000530266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is the first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Simultaneously, opioids are essential medicines in acute pain management. The literature is scarce on acute pain management in individuals with OUD, and guidelines are controversial for patients on OAT. We aimed at analyzing rescue analgesia in opioid-dependent individuals on OAT during hospitalization in the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient hospital records were extracted from the database over 6 months (Jan-Jun) in 2015 and 2018. Of the 3,216 extracted patient records, we identified 255 cases on OAT with full datasets. Rescue analgesia was defined according to established principles of acute pain management, e.g., i) the analgesic agent is identical to the OAT medication, and ii) the opioid agent is dosed above 1/6th morphine equivalent dose of the OAT medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were on average 51.3 ± 10.5 years old (range: 22-79 years), of which 64% were men. The most frequent OAT agents were methadone and morphine (34.9% and 34.5%). Rescue analgesia was not documented in 14 cases. Guideline-concordant rescue analgesia was observed in 186 cases (72.9%) and consisted mostly of NSAIDs, including paracetamol (80 cases), and identical agents such as the OAT opioid (70 cases). Guideline-divergent rescue analgesia was observed in 69 (27.1%) cases, predominantly due to an underdosed opioid agent (32 cases), another agent other than the OAT (18 cases), or contraindicated agents (10 cases).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our analysis suggests that rescue analgesia in hospitalized OAT patients was predominantly concordant with guidelines, while divergent prescriptions seemed to follow common principles of pain medicine. Clear guidelines are needed to appropriately treat acute pain in hospitalized OAT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":"29 4","pages":"253-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is the first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Simultaneously, opioids are essential medicines in acute pain management. The literature is scarce on acute pain management in individuals with OUD, and guidelines are controversial for patients on OAT. We aimed at analyzing rescue analgesia in opioid-dependent individuals on OAT during hospitalization in the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

Methods: Patient hospital records were extracted from the database over 6 months (Jan-Jun) in 2015 and 2018. Of the 3,216 extracted patient records, we identified 255 cases on OAT with full datasets. Rescue analgesia was defined according to established principles of acute pain management, e.g., i) the analgesic agent is identical to the OAT medication, and ii) the opioid agent is dosed above 1/6th morphine equivalent dose of the OAT medication.

Results: The patients were on average 51.3 ± 10.5 years old (range: 22-79 years), of which 64% were men. The most frequent OAT agents were methadone and morphine (34.9% and 34.5%). Rescue analgesia was not documented in 14 cases. Guideline-concordant rescue analgesia was observed in 186 cases (72.9%) and consisted mostly of NSAIDs, including paracetamol (80 cases), and identical agents such as the OAT opioid (70 cases). Guideline-divergent rescue analgesia was observed in 69 (27.1%) cases, predominantly due to an underdosed opioid agent (32 cases), another agent other than the OAT (18 cases), or contraindicated agents (10 cases).

Discussion: Our analysis suggests that rescue analgesia in hospitalized OAT patients was predominantly concordant with guidelines, while divergent prescriptions seemed to follow common principles of pain medicine. Clear guidelines are needed to appropriately treat acute pain in hospitalized OAT patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院期间接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗的阿片类依赖个体的抢救性镇痛:遵循指南治疗。
简介:阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)是阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的一线治疗方法。同时,阿片类药物是急性疼痛管理的基本药物。关于OUD患者急性疼痛管理的文献很少,OAT患者的指南也存在争议。我们旨在分析在瑞士巴塞尔大学医院住院期间使用OAT的阿片类药物依赖者的抢救性镇痛。方法:从数据库中提取2015年和2018年6个月(1月至6月)的患者住院记录。在3216份提取的患者记录中,我们通过完整的数据集在OAT上确定了255例病例。救援镇痛是根据急性疼痛管理的既定原则定义的,例如,i)镇痛剂与OAT药物相同,以及ii)阿片类药物的剂量高于OAT药物的1/6吗啡当量。结果:患者平均年龄51.3±10.5岁(年龄范围:22-79岁),其中64%为男性。最常见的OAT药物是美沙酮和吗啡(分别为34.9%和34.5%)。14例患者的抢救镇痛没有记录。186例(72.9%)观察到指南一致的抢救镇痛,主要由非甾体抗炎药组成,包括扑热息痛(80例)和相同的药物,如OAT阿片类药物(70例)。在69例(27.1%)病例中观察到指南差异性救援镇痛,主要是由于阿片类药物(32例)、OAT以外的另一种药物(18例)或禁忌症药物(10例)。讨论:我们的分析表明,住院OAT患者的抢救性镇痛主要符合指南,而不同的处方似乎遵循了疼痛药物的共同原则。需要明确的指导方针来适当治疗住院OAT患者的急性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive function among people with severe substance use. Effectiveness of Machine Learning-Based Adjustments to an eHealth Intervention Targeting Mild Alcohol Use. Impact of Working Conditions and Other Determinants on the Risk of Substance Misuse among Healthcare Residents: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study. ESCAPE Study: Cannabidiol Use in Patients Treated for Substance Use Disorders, Prevalence of Use, and Characteristics of Users. Exploring Recovery Priorities in Inpatient Addiction Treatment: A Q-Methodological Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1