Intravitreal Injections and Face Masks: Endophthalmitis Risk Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13776
Saeed Karimi, Homayoun Nikkhah, Amir Mohammadzadeh, Alireza Ramezani, Iman Ansari, Hosein Nouri, Seyed-Hossein Abtahi
{"title":"Intravitreal Injections and Face Masks: Endophthalmitis Risk Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Saeed Karimi,&nbsp;Homayoun Nikkhah,&nbsp;Amir Mohammadzadeh,&nbsp;Alireza Ramezani,&nbsp;Iman Ansari,&nbsp;Hosein Nouri,&nbsp;Seyed-Hossein Abtahi","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the added risk of acute endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections associated with the widespread use of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, single-center study, records of patients with acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections during the pre-COVID era-that is, March 1<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>st</mtext></msup></math>, 2013 to October 31<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>st</mtext></msup></math>, 2019 -and the COVID-19 era-that is, March 1<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>st</mtext></msup></math>, 2020 to April 1<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>st</mtext></msup></math>, 2021 -were reviewed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28,085 IVB injections were performed during the pre-COVID era; nine eyes of nine patients developed acute post-IVB endophthalmitis in this era, giving an overall incidence of 0.032% (3.2 in 10,000 injections). In the COVID era, 10,717 IVB injections were performed; four eyes of four patients developed acute post-IVB endophthalmitis in this era, giving an overall incidence of 0.037% (3.7 in 10,000 injections). The incidences of post-IVB endophthalmitis during these two eras were not statistically significantly different (<i>P</i> = 0.779).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Face masking protocols seem unlikely to impose any additional risk of post-IVB endophthalmitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"283-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432929/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the added risk of acute endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections associated with the widespread use of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, records of patients with acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections during the pre-COVID era-that is, March 1st, 2013 to October 31st, 2019 -and the COVID-19 era-that is, March 1st, 2020 to April 1st, 2021 -were reviewed and compared.

Results: A total of 28,085 IVB injections were performed during the pre-COVID era; nine eyes of nine patients developed acute post-IVB endophthalmitis in this era, giving an overall incidence of 0.032% (3.2 in 10,000 injections). In the COVID era, 10,717 IVB injections were performed; four eyes of four patients developed acute post-IVB endophthalmitis in this era, giving an overall incidence of 0.037% (3.7 in 10,000 injections). The incidences of post-IVB endophthalmitis during these two eras were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.779).

Conclusion: Face masking protocols seem unlikely to impose any additional risk of post-IVB endophthalmitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内注射和口罩:COVID-19大流行之前和期间的眼内炎风险
目的:评估COVID-19大流行期间广泛使用口罩与玻璃体内注射后急性眼内炎的增加风险。方法:在这项回顾性、单中心研究中,对2013年3月1日至2019年10月31日前和2020年3月1日至2021年4月1日期间玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(IVB)后急性眼内炎患者的记录进行回顾和比较。结果:新冠肺炎前共进行静脉注射28,085次;在这一时期,9例患者中有9只眼发生急性静脉注射后眼内炎,总发病率为0.032%(每10,000次注射3.2次)。新冠肺炎疫情期间,共进行静脉注射10717次;在这一时期,4例患者中有4只眼发生急性静脉注射后眼内炎,总发病率为0.037%(3.7 / 10,000次注射)。两组术后眼内炎发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.779)。结论:面部遮盖方案似乎不太可能增加静脉注射后眼内炎的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Outcomes of Stage 2 (Pivotal) Use of a Modified Keratoprosthesis Device (ORC-KPro) in Patients with End-stage Corneal Blindness. Doxycycline versus Curcumin for Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Activity Following Chemically Induced Inflammation in Corneal Cells. Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1