Gluten-Free Diet Knowledge and Adherence in Adolescents with Celiac Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Katherine Pohoreski, Simonne L Horwitz, Dominica Gidrewicz
{"title":"Gluten-Free Diet Knowledge and Adherence in Adolescents with Celiac Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Katherine Pohoreski,&nbsp;Simonne L Horwitz,&nbsp;Dominica Gidrewicz","doi":"10.1097/PG9.0000000000000330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the relationship between knowledge of, and adherence to, the gluten-free diet (GFD) in a local population of adolescents with celiac disease (CD). The secondary objectives were to identify information sources used to learn about the GFD and to compare adolescents' and parents' knowledge of the GFD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents (12-17 years) with CD and their parents from pediatric gastroenterology clinics in Calgary, Alberta, completed an online survey containing a knowledge assessment (Gluten-Free Diet Quiz [GFD-Q]), an adherence scale, questions about GFD information sources, and demographic/clinical information. GFD-Q scores were deemed \"sufficient knowledge\" with correct identification of 3/3 gluten-containing foods, ≥4/7 gluten-free foods, and ≥ 4/7 foods that may contain gluten; otherwise, scores were termed \"insufficient knowledge\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 40 adolescent-parent pairs, 15 of 40 adolescents (37%) had sufficient knowledge, and 25 of 40 adolescents (63%) had insufficient knowledge. Within the insufficient knowledge group, 14 of 25 (56%) did not correctly identify enough allowed gluten-free foods. Parents scored higher on the GFD-Q (67% had sufficient knowledge). Adolescents reported overall adherence to the GFD (88%), with adherence being similar between the sufficient and insufficient knowledge groups (80% versus 92%). The most helpful information sources included physicians, another person with CD, parent(s), and Google; apps were infrequently used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents report good adherence; however, they struggle with GFD knowledge, particularly in identifying gluten-free foods. Further research is required to explore GFD educational tools, including mobile apps and dietician-led teaching sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17618,"journal":{"name":"JPGN Reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"e330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPGN Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PG9.0000000000000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the relationship between knowledge of, and adherence to, the gluten-free diet (GFD) in a local population of adolescents with celiac disease (CD). The secondary objectives were to identify information sources used to learn about the GFD and to compare adolescents' and parents' knowledge of the GFD.

Methods: Adolescents (12-17 years) with CD and their parents from pediatric gastroenterology clinics in Calgary, Alberta, completed an online survey containing a knowledge assessment (Gluten-Free Diet Quiz [GFD-Q]), an adherence scale, questions about GFD information sources, and demographic/clinical information. GFD-Q scores were deemed "sufficient knowledge" with correct identification of 3/3 gluten-containing foods, ≥4/7 gluten-free foods, and ≥ 4/7 foods that may contain gluten; otherwise, scores were termed "insufficient knowledge".

Results: Of the 40 adolescent-parent pairs, 15 of 40 adolescents (37%) had sufficient knowledge, and 25 of 40 adolescents (63%) had insufficient knowledge. Within the insufficient knowledge group, 14 of 25 (56%) did not correctly identify enough allowed gluten-free foods. Parents scored higher on the GFD-Q (67% had sufficient knowledge). Adolescents reported overall adherence to the GFD (88%), with adherence being similar between the sufficient and insufficient knowledge groups (80% versus 92%). The most helpful information sources included physicians, another person with CD, parent(s), and Google; apps were infrequently used.

Conclusion: Adolescents report good adherence; however, they struggle with GFD knowledge, particularly in identifying gluten-free foods. Further research is required to explore GFD educational tools, including mobile apps and dietician-led teaching sessions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年乳糜泻患者的无麸质饮食知识和依从性:一项横断面研究
目的:本研究考察了当地患有乳糜泻(CD)的青少年对无麸质饮食(GFD)的了解和坚持之间的关系。次要目的是找出了解政府服务计划的资讯来源,并比较青少年和家长对政府服务计划的认识。方法:来自阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里儿科胃肠病学诊所的患有乳糜泻的青少年(12-17岁)及其父母完成了一项在线调查,调查内容包括知识评估(无麸质饮食测验[GFD- q])、依从性量表、关于无麸质饮食信息源的问题以及人口统计学/临床信息。GFD-Q评分被认为是“足够的知识”,正确识别3/3的含麸质食品、≥4/7的无麸质食品和≥4/7的可能含有麸质食品;否则,分数被认为是“知识不足”。结果:40对青少年-父母对中,40对青少年中有15对(37%)知识充足,40对青少年中有25对(63%)知识不足。在知识不足组中,25人中有14人(56%)没有正确识别足够的允许无谷蛋白食品。父母在GFD-Q上得分更高(67%的人有足够的知识)。青少年报告对GFD的总体依从性(88%),在知识充足组和知识不足组之间的依从性相似(80%对92%)。最有用的信息来源包括医生、其他乳糜泻患者、父母和谷歌;应用程序很少被使用。结论:青少年的依从性良好;然而,他们很难掌握GFD知识,特别是在识别无麸质食品方面。需要进一步的研究来探索GFD的教育工具,包括移动应用程序和营养师主导的教学课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘You can be as vigilant as you can, yet they make their way in’: A descriptive study of parent and caregiver perspectives towards keeping children safe from button batteries Co‐occurrence of collagenous gastrointestinal disease in siblings in early childhood: New insight into a rare condition Impact of gender, race, and age of onset on the phenotype and comorbidities of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis Pediatric eosinophilic gastritis treated with benralizumab: A case report B cell depletion for autoimmune liver diseases: A retrospective review of indications and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1