Quadratus Lumborum Block Against Coupled Transversus Abdominis Block and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5812/aapm-134845
Amany Faheem Omara, Amr Arafa Elbadry, Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar
{"title":"Quadratus Lumborum Block Against Coupled Transversus Abdominis Block and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Amany Faheem Omara,&nbsp;Amr Arafa Elbadry,&nbsp;Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar","doi":"10.5812/aapm-134845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nerve blocks have been one of the most common anesthetic methods for abdominal surgeries since the last four decades.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) against bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis block (TAB) and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric nerve blocks (IINB) in abdominal total hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty female patients scheduled for the surgery of total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia participated in this randomized prospective trial. They were randomly assigned to two dual TAB / IINB (n = 30) and QLB (n = 30) groups. Moreover, the visual analog scores (VAS), the total amount of morphine consumed after surgery during the first 24 hours, the number of individuals requiring rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesia duration, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Morphine consumption was equal in both groups (P = 0.908). Furthermore, the analgesia duration in the two groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.879), with mean values of 15.4 and 15.6 hours, respectively. During 24 hours, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of VAS between the two groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QLB might be a viable replacement for TAB/IINB for postoperative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"e134845"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/ec/aapm-13-2-134845.PMC10439688.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-134845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nerve blocks have been one of the most common anesthetic methods for abdominal surgeries since the last four decades.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) against bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis block (TAB) and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric nerve blocks (IINB) in abdominal total hysterectomy.

Methods: Sixty female patients scheduled for the surgery of total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia participated in this randomized prospective trial. They were randomly assigned to two dual TAB / IINB (n = 30) and QLB (n = 30) groups. Moreover, the visual analog scores (VAS), the total amount of morphine consumed after surgery during the first 24 hours, the number of individuals requiring rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesia duration, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: Morphine consumption was equal in both groups (P = 0.908). Furthermore, the analgesia duration in the two groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.879), with mean values of 15.4 and 15.6 hours, respectively. During 24 hours, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of VAS between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The QLB might be a viable replacement for TAB/IINB for postoperative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰方肌阻滞对抗经腹阻滞联合髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞用于全腹子宫切除术后的术后镇痛:一项随机对照试验。
背景:近四十年来,神经阻滞一直是腹部手术中最常用的麻醉方法之一。目的:比较双侧超声引导下腰方肌阻滞(QLB)与双侧超声引导下经腹阻滞(TAB)及髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞(IINB)在腹部全子宫切除术中的术后镇痛效果。方法:60例脊柱麻醉下腹式全子宫切除术的女性患者参与了这项随机前瞻性试验。随机分为双TAB / IINB组(n = 30)和QLB组(n = 30)。记录两组视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后24小时吗啡总用量、需要抢救性镇痛的人数、术后镇痛持续时间及术后并发症。结果:两组吗啡用量相等(P = 0.908)。两组患者镇痛时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.879),平均分别为15.4、15.6小时。24小时内,两组患者VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:QLB可替代TAB/IINB用于腹式全子宫切除术后镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
The Power of Color Flow Doppler Ultrasonography Versus Blind Technique in Localization of Epidural Catheter: A Randomized Prospective Study. Spinal Anesthesia Management in a 30-Year-Old Patient with Progeria Syndrome: A Case Report. Robotic Pediatric Urologic Surgery-Clinical Anesthetic Considerations: A Comprehensive Review. Anesthetic Management Recommendations Using a Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgeries Retraction Note: The Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Esmolol on Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Middle Ear Surgery Under Hypotensive Technique: A Comparative, Randomized, Double-blind Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1