Primary care and abortion legislation in Chile: A failed point of entry

Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1111/dewb.12377
Lidia Casas, Lieta Vivaldi, Adela Montero, Natalia Bozo, Juan José Álvarez, Jorge Babul
{"title":"Primary care and abortion legislation in Chile: A failed point of entry","authors":"Lidia Casas,&nbsp;Lieta Vivaldi,&nbsp;Adela Montero,&nbsp;Natalia Bozo,&nbsp;Juan José Álvarez,&nbsp;Jorge Babul","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While Chile's partial decriminalization of abortion in 2017 was a long overdue recognition of women's sexual and reproductive rights, nearly four years later the caseload remains well below expectations. This pattern is the product of standing barriers in access to abortion-related health services, especially at the primary care point of entry. This study seeks to identify and describe these barriers. The findings presented here were obtained through a qualitative, exploratory study based on 19 semi-structured interviews with relevant actors identified through non-random sampling and snowballing techniques. Coding was inductive and complemented by semantic content analysis. The authors find that the key barriers in primary care to accessing legal abortion are unfamiliarity with the law, insufficient practitioner training, intersectoral discrimination, and the stigma surrounding abortion. They conclude that the government needs to exercise its constitutional mandate as guarantor of public health and act promptly to safeguard and guarantee the abortion rights of Chilean women.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dewb.12377","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.12377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While Chile's partial decriminalization of abortion in 2017 was a long overdue recognition of women's sexual and reproductive rights, nearly four years later the caseload remains well below expectations. This pattern is the product of standing barriers in access to abortion-related health services, especially at the primary care point of entry. This study seeks to identify and describe these barriers. The findings presented here were obtained through a qualitative, exploratory study based on 19 semi-structured interviews with relevant actors identified through non-random sampling and snowballing techniques. Coding was inductive and complemented by semantic content analysis. The authors find that the key barriers in primary care to accessing legal abortion are unfamiliarity with the law, insufficient practitioner training, intersectoral discrimination, and the stigma surrounding abortion. They conclude that the government needs to exercise its constitutional mandate as guarantor of public health and act promptly to safeguard and guarantee the abortion rights of Chilean women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
智利的初级保健和堕胎立法:一个失败的切入点
虽然智利在2017年将堕胎部分合法化是对妇女性权利和生殖权利的长期认可,但近四年后,案件数量仍远低于预期。这种模式是在获得与堕胎有关的保健服务方面存在障碍的产物,特别是在初级保健入境点。本研究旨在识别和描述这些障碍。本文的研究结果是通过一项定性的探索性研究获得的,该研究基于19次半结构化访谈,通过非随机抽样和滚雪球技术确定了相关参与者。对编码进行归纳,并辅以语义内容分析。作者发现,在初级保健中获得合法堕胎的主要障碍是对法律不熟悉、从业者培训不足、部门间歧视以及围绕堕胎的污名。他们的结论是,政府需要行使宪法赋予的公共卫生保障者的职责,迅速采取行动,维护和保障智利妇女的堕胎权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1