Ongoing Brain Activity and Its Role in Cognition: Dual versus Baseline Models.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroscientist Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1177/10738584221081752
Georg Northoff, Deniz Vatansever, Andrea Scalabrini, Emmanuel A Stamatakis
{"title":"Ongoing Brain Activity and Its Role in Cognition: Dual versus Baseline Models.","authors":"Georg Northoff,&nbsp;Deniz Vatansever,&nbsp;Andrea Scalabrini,&nbsp;Emmanuel A Stamatakis","doi":"10.1177/10738584221081752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What is the role of the brain's ongoing activity for cognition? The predominant perspectives associate ongoing brain activity with resting state, the default-mode network (DMN), and internally oriented mentation. This triad is often contrasted with task states, non-DMN brain networks, and externally oriented mentation, together comprising a \"dual model\" of brain and cognition. In opposition to this duality, however, we propose that ongoing brain activity serves as a neuronal baseline; this builds upon Raichle's original search for the default mode of brain function that extended beyond the canonical default-mode brain regions. That entails what we refer to as the \"baseline model.\" Akin to an internal biological clock for the rest of the organism, the ongoing brain activity may serve as an internal point of reference or standard by providing a shared neural code for the brain's rest as well as task states, including their associated cognition. Such shared neural code is manifest in the spatiotemporal organization of the brain's ongoing activity, including its global signal topography and dynamics like intrinsic neural timescales. We conclude that recent empirical evidence supports a baseline model over the dual model; the ongoing activity provides a global shared neural code that allows integrating the brain's rest and task states, its DMN and non-DMN, and internally and externally oriented cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49753,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscientist","volume":"29 4","pages":"393-420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscientist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10738584221081752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

What is the role of the brain's ongoing activity for cognition? The predominant perspectives associate ongoing brain activity with resting state, the default-mode network (DMN), and internally oriented mentation. This triad is often contrasted with task states, non-DMN brain networks, and externally oriented mentation, together comprising a "dual model" of brain and cognition. In opposition to this duality, however, we propose that ongoing brain activity serves as a neuronal baseline; this builds upon Raichle's original search for the default mode of brain function that extended beyond the canonical default-mode brain regions. That entails what we refer to as the "baseline model." Akin to an internal biological clock for the rest of the organism, the ongoing brain activity may serve as an internal point of reference or standard by providing a shared neural code for the brain's rest as well as task states, including their associated cognition. Such shared neural code is manifest in the spatiotemporal organization of the brain's ongoing activity, including its global signal topography and dynamics like intrinsic neural timescales. We conclude that recent empirical evidence supports a baseline model over the dual model; the ongoing activity provides a global shared neural code that allows integrating the brain's rest and task states, its DMN and non-DMN, and internally and externally oriented cognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续的大脑活动及其在认知中的作用:双基线模型与基线模型。
大脑正在进行的认知活动的作用是什么?主要的观点将正在进行的大脑活动与静息状态、默认模式网络(DMN)和内部导向的心理状态联系起来。这种三合一通常与任务状态、非dmn大脑网络和外向型心理形成对比,共同构成大脑和认知的“双重模型”。然而,与这种二元性相反,我们提出正在进行的大脑活动作为神经元基线;这是建立在Raichle最初对大脑功能默认模式的研究之上的,该研究超出了规范的默认模式大脑区域。这就需要我们所说的“基线模型”。类似于有机体其他部分的内部生物钟,持续的大脑活动可以作为一个内部参考点或标准,为大脑的休息和任务状态提供共享的神经代码,包括它们相关的认知。这种共享的神经代码体现在大脑持续活动的时空组织中,包括其全局信号地形和动态,如内在神经时间尺度。我们得出结论,最近的经验证据支持基线模型优于双重模型;正在进行的活动提供了一个全局共享的神经代码,允许整合大脑的休息和任务状态,它的DMN和非DMN,以及内部和外部导向的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscientist
Neuroscientist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Edited by Stephen G. Waxman, The Neuroscientist (NRO) reviews and evaluates the noteworthy advances and key trends in molecular, cellular, developmental, behavioral systems, and cognitive neuroscience in a unique disease-relevant format. Aimed at basic neuroscientists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and psychiatrists in research, academic, and clinical settings, The Neuroscientist reviews and updates the most important new and emerging basic and clinical neuroscience research.
期刊最新文献
A new frontier in the treatment of schizophrenia. Forthcoming Articles. Single-Nuclei Multiomics of the Prefrontal Cortex: 388 Brains Tell a Powerful Story. The Day After. Activity-Dependent Synapse Refinement: From Mechanisms to Molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1