The Experiences of People Who Are Incarcerated in Accessing Mental Health Care: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Nursing Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000405
Anne L Reeder
{"title":"The Experiences of People Who Are Incarcerated in Accessing Mental Health Care: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography.","authors":"Anne L Reeder","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Overview: </strong>This meta-ethnography synthesizes the findings of seven qualitative studies on the experiences of people who are incarcerated in accessing mental health care with a goal of better understanding the scope of these experiences and identifying gaps in custodial mental health care. Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach was used.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Five themes were identified: stressful incarceration environments, lack of resources, care is not patient centered, lack of trust, and the value of therapeutic relationships. Findings suggest that the custodial mental healthcare system may provide care that is misaligned with the needs of people who are accessing it.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations of this meta-ethnography include the small number of studies identified for review, the diverse foci of the studies, the diversity of the custodial and mental health systems in the four countries from which the studies came, and the unaddressed mixing of jail and prison data in three of the studies.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Future research should focus on obtaining additional perspectives from people who are accessing custodial mental healthcare services in jail and prison, exploring the differences between the experiences of people in jail versus prison, and identifying ways to develop and maintain high-quality therapeutic relationships between people who are incarcerated and custodial mental healthcare providers, including nurses who work in custodial facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51324,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overview: This meta-ethnography synthesizes the findings of seven qualitative studies on the experiences of people who are incarcerated in accessing mental health care with a goal of better understanding the scope of these experiences and identifying gaps in custodial mental health care. Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach was used.

Findings: Five themes were identified: stressful incarceration environments, lack of resources, care is not patient centered, lack of trust, and the value of therapeutic relationships. Findings suggest that the custodial mental healthcare system may provide care that is misaligned with the needs of people who are accessing it.

Limitations: Limitations of this meta-ethnography include the small number of studies identified for review, the diverse foci of the studies, the diversity of the custodial and mental health systems in the four countries from which the studies came, and the unaddressed mixing of jail and prison data in three of the studies.

Implications: Future research should focus on obtaining additional perspectives from people who are accessing custodial mental healthcare services in jail and prison, exploring the differences between the experiences of people in jail versus prison, and identifying ways to develop and maintain high-quality therapeutic relationships between people who are incarcerated and custodial mental healthcare providers, including nurses who work in custodial facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被监禁的人在获得精神卫生保健方面的经历:一种定性的元民族志。
概述:这一元民族志综合了七项关于被监禁者获得精神卫生保健经验的定性研究的结果,目的是更好地了解这些经验的范围并确定监禁精神卫生保健方面的差距。采用了Noblit和Hare的元人种志方法。研究结果:确定了五个主题:紧张的监禁环境,缺乏资源,护理不是以病人为中心,缺乏信任,以及治疗关系的价值。调查结果表明,监护精神卫生保健系统可能提供的护理与正在访问它的人的需求不一致。局限性:该元人种志的局限性包括:确定用于审查的研究数量较少,研究的焦点不同,研究来自的四个国家的监护和精神卫生系统的多样性,以及其中三个研究中未解决的监狱和监狱数据混合问题。含义:未来的研究应侧重于从在监狱和监狱中获得监护精神卫生保健服务的人那里获得更多的观点,探索监狱和监狱中人们的经历之间的差异,并确定在被监禁者和监护精神卫生保健提供者(包括在监禁设施中工作的护士)之间发展和维持高质量治疗关系的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Nursing (JFN) the official journal of the International Association of Forensic Nurses, is a groundbreaking publication that addresses health care issues that transcend health and legal systems by articulating nursing’s response to violence. The journal features empirical studies, review and theoretical articles, methodological and concept papers, and case reports that address the provision of care to victims and perpetrators of violence, trauma, and abuse. Topics include interpersonal violence (sexual assault, abuse, intimate partner violence); death investigation; legal and ethical issues; forensic mental health nursing; correctional nursing; and emergency and trauma nursing.
期刊最新文献
Professional Quality of Life and Turnover Intention in Forensic Nurse Program Coordinators: Implications to Forensic Nurse Workforce Development. The Purpose, Process, and Advancement of Forensic Nursing Standards. Unintended Consequences: A Case Study of a Toddler's Accidental Burn Injury Caused by a Hair Crimper. Romantic Love and Its Link With Gender-Based Violence. Sexual Violence in Virtual Reality: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1