Anti-Spike Antibody Responses in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients to Two Doses of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis.

Jaime L Shahan, Robert H Collins, Prapti Patel, Yazan F Madanat, Madhuri Vusirikala
{"title":"Anti-Spike Antibody Responses in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients to Two Doses of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis.","authors":"Jaime L Shahan,&nbsp;Robert H Collins,&nbsp;Prapti Patel,&nbsp;Yazan F Madanat,&nbsp;Madhuri Vusirikala","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.5.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients were excluded from the initial SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination efficacy trials. Suboptimal vaccine responses have been reported in immunocompromised cohorts such as patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies, suggesting the need for additional research. Widespread data on the antibody responses and vaccine efficacy in allo-HSCT recipients is limited. In our single-center, retrospective study, we analyzed the anti-spike IgG antibody responses in 75 allo-HSCT recipients who received a series of two doses of mRNA vaccination. We collected data on previous COVID-19 infection, B and T lymphocyte recovery, donor types, graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), and immunosuppressive medications at the time of vaccination. With the original variant, a cutoff of 4,160 arbitrary units (AU)/mL has been correlated with a 0.95 probability of a viral neutralization. We also examined the number of allo-HSCT recipients who achieved this conservative threshold. To our knowledge, no correlate exists for the currently prevalent Omicron variant and viral neutralization. Despite 29.3% (22/75) of patients being on systemic immunosuppressive medications due to chronic GVHD, positive antibody responses > 50 AU/mL were seen in 96% of patients. However, only 48% (36/75) of patients were above the neutralizing antibody threshold. Those with previous COVID-19 infection had significantly higher antibody responses. Although encouraging, the variability of the responses underscores the concept of ongoing antibody monitoring as well as consideration of additional doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":17176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","volume":"14 5","pages":"367-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b2/bf/jadpro-14-367.PMC10414532.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.5.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients were excluded from the initial SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination efficacy trials. Suboptimal vaccine responses have been reported in immunocompromised cohorts such as patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies, suggesting the need for additional research. Widespread data on the antibody responses and vaccine efficacy in allo-HSCT recipients is limited. In our single-center, retrospective study, we analyzed the anti-spike IgG antibody responses in 75 allo-HSCT recipients who received a series of two doses of mRNA vaccination. We collected data on previous COVID-19 infection, B and T lymphocyte recovery, donor types, graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), and immunosuppressive medications at the time of vaccination. With the original variant, a cutoff of 4,160 arbitrary units (AU)/mL has been correlated with a 0.95 probability of a viral neutralization. We also examined the number of allo-HSCT recipients who achieved this conservative threshold. To our knowledge, no correlate exists for the currently prevalent Omicron variant and viral neutralization. Despite 29.3% (22/75) of patients being on systemic immunosuppressive medications due to chronic GVHD, positive antibody responses > 50 AU/mL were seen in 96% of patients. However, only 48% (36/75) of patients were above the neutralizing antibody threshold. Those with previous COVID-19 infection had significantly higher antibody responses. Although encouraging, the variability of the responses underscores the concept of ongoing antibody monitoring as well as consideration of additional doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in this cohort.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同种异体干细胞移植受者对两剂COVID-19 mRNA疫苗接种的抗刺突抗体反应:回顾性单中心分析
同种异体造血干细胞移植(alloo - hsct)接受者被排除在最初的SARS-CoV-2 mRNA疫苗接种效果试验之外。据报道,在免疫功能低下的人群中,如实体瘤或血液恶性肿瘤患者,疫苗反应不佳,这表明需要进一步的研究。关于同种异体造血干细胞受体的抗体反应和疫苗效力的广泛数据是有限的。在我们的单中心回顾性研究中,我们分析了75名接受了两剂mRNA疫苗接种的同种异体造血干细胞受体的抗刺突IgG抗体反应。我们收集了既往COVID-19感染、B淋巴细胞和T淋巴细胞恢复、供体类型、移植物vs。-宿主病(GVHD)和免疫抑制药物在疫苗接种时。对于原始变异,4,160任意单位(AU)/mL的截止值与0.95的病毒中和概率相关。我们还检查了达到这个保守阈值的同种异体造血干细胞移植受者的数量。据我们所知,目前流行的欧米克隆变异和病毒中和没有相关性。尽管29.3%(22/75)的慢性GVHD患者正在接受全身免疫抑制药物治疗,但96%的患者抗体阳性反应> 50 AU/mL。然而,只有48%(36/75)的患者高于中和抗体阈值。之前感染过COVID-19的人的抗体反应明显更高。尽管令人鼓舞,但反应的可变性强调了持续抗体监测的概念,并考虑在该队列中增加COVID-19疫苗剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action A Real-World Evidence Primer for Advanced Practice Providers: Integrating P-Reality X Into Shared Decision-Making for People With HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer Impact of an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Clinical Trial Enrollment in The US Oncology Network’s MYLUNG Consortium Beyond Standard Endocrine Therapy: A New Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1