Telemedicine Training in Ophthalmology Residency Programs.

Ryan S Meshkin, Kanza Aziz, Marguerite C Weinert, Alice C Lorch, Grayson W Armstrong
{"title":"Telemedicine Training in Ophthalmology Residency Programs.","authors":"Ryan S Meshkin, Kanza Aziz, Marguerite C Weinert, Alice C Lorch, Grayson W Armstrong","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior tothe coronaviruspandemic,surgicalspecialties utilized telemedicine sparingly. One study cites prepandemic rates of surgical telehealth use to be less than 1% of new patient encounters, 1 while another study found fewer than 2% of clinicians provided any outpatient care via telemedicine. 2 Within the fi eld of ophthalmology, telemedicine models were largely limited to screening and referral for diabetic retinopathy, 3 age-related macular degeneration, 4 and glaucoma. 5 With the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, however, telemedicineutilizationfortriage,diagnosis,andmanagement of disease increased considerably. An astonishing 34% of new patient encounters across surgical specialties were conducted via telehealth at the height of the pandemic. 1 Two signi fi cant questions have arisen in the wake of the early adoption of telemedicine: what is the staying power of telemedicine among surgical subspecialties, and are physicians appropriately trained to utilize telemedicine? Telemedicine utilization declined in late 2020 with the resumption of in-person care, though the proportion of patient visitsconductedviavirtual means remained markedly higher than it had been prepandemic. 1,6","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e172-e174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/74/10-1055-s-0043-1772789.PMC10421718.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior tothe coronaviruspandemic,surgicalspecialties utilized telemedicine sparingly. One study cites prepandemic rates of surgical telehealth use to be less than 1% of new patient encounters, 1 while another study found fewer than 2% of clinicians provided any outpatient care via telemedicine. 2 Within the fi eld of ophthalmology, telemedicine models were largely limited to screening and referral for diabetic retinopathy, 3 age-related macular degeneration, 4 and glaucoma. 5 With the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, however, telemedicineutilizationfortriage,diagnosis,andmanagement of disease increased considerably. An astonishing 34% of new patient encounters across surgical specialties were conducted via telehealth at the height of the pandemic. 1 Two signi fi cant questions have arisen in the wake of the early adoption of telemedicine: what is the staying power of telemedicine among surgical subspecialties, and are physicians appropriately trained to utilize telemedicine? Telemedicine utilization declined in late 2020 with the resumption of in-person care, though the proportion of patient visitsconductedviavirtual means remained markedly higher than it had been prepandemic. 1,6
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼科住院医师远程医疗培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1