Ryan S Meshkin, Kanza Aziz, Marguerite C Weinert, Alice C Lorch, Grayson W Armstrong
{"title":"Telemedicine Training in Ophthalmology Residency Programs.","authors":"Ryan S Meshkin, Kanza Aziz, Marguerite C Weinert, Alice C Lorch, Grayson W Armstrong","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior tothe coronaviruspandemic,surgicalspecialties utilized telemedicine sparingly. One study cites prepandemic rates of surgical telehealth use to be less than 1% of new patient encounters, 1 while another study found fewer than 2% of clinicians provided any outpatient care via telemedicine. 2 Within the fi eld of ophthalmology, telemedicine models were largely limited to screening and referral for diabetic retinopathy, 3 age-related macular degeneration, 4 and glaucoma. 5 With the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, however, telemedicineutilizationfortriage,diagnosis,andmanagement of disease increased considerably. An astonishing 34% of new patient encounters across surgical specialties were conducted via telehealth at the height of the pandemic. 1 Two signi fi cant questions have arisen in the wake of the early adoption of telemedicine: what is the staying power of telemedicine among surgical subspecialties, and are physicians appropriately trained to utilize telemedicine? Telemedicine utilization declined in late 2020 with the resumption of in-person care, though the proportion of patient visitsconductedviavirtual means remained markedly higher than it had been prepandemic. 1,6","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e172-e174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/74/10-1055-s-0043-1772789.PMC10421718.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prior tothe coronaviruspandemic,surgicalspecialties utilized telemedicine sparingly. One study cites prepandemic rates of surgical telehealth use to be less than 1% of new patient encounters, 1 while another study found fewer than 2% of clinicians provided any outpatient care via telemedicine. 2 Within the fi eld of ophthalmology, telemedicine models were largely limited to screening and referral for diabetic retinopathy, 3 age-related macular degeneration, 4 and glaucoma. 5 With the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, however, telemedicineutilizationfortriage,diagnosis,andmanagement of disease increased considerably. An astonishing 34% of new patient encounters across surgical specialties were conducted via telehealth at the height of the pandemic. 1 Two signi fi cant questions have arisen in the wake of the early adoption of telemedicine: what is the staying power of telemedicine among surgical subspecialties, and are physicians appropriately trained to utilize telemedicine? Telemedicine utilization declined in late 2020 with the resumption of in-person care, though the proportion of patient visitsconductedviavirtual means remained markedly higher than it had been prepandemic. 1,6