The Role of Family Members in Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation Trials: More Than Psychosocial Support.

IF 2.6 4区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Neuroethics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1007/s12152-023-09520-7
Marion Boulicault, Sara Goering, Eran Klein, Darin Dougherty, Alik S Widge
{"title":"The Role of Family Members in Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation Trials: More Than Psychosocial Support.","authors":"Marion Boulicault,&nbsp;Sara Goering,&nbsp;Eran Klein,&nbsp;Darin Dougherty,&nbsp;Alik S Widge","doi":"10.1007/s12152-023-09520-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family members can provide crucial support to individuals participating in clinical trials. In research on the \"newest frontier\" of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)-the use of DBS for psychiatric conditions-family member support is frequently listed as a criterion for trial enrollment. Despite the significance of family members, qualitative ethics research on DBS for psychiatric conditions has focused almost exclusively on the perspectives and experiences of DBS recipients. This qualitative study is one of the first to include both DBS recipients and their family members as interview participants. Using dyadic thematic analysis-an approach that takes both the individuals and the relationship as units of analyses-this study analyzes the complex ways in which family relationships can affect DBS trial participation, and how DBS trial participation in turn influences family relationships. Based on these findings, we propose ways to improve study designs to better take family relationships into account, and better support family members in taking on the complex, essential roles that they play in DBS trials for psychiatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12152-023-09520-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":49255,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics","volume":"16 2","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212803/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-023-09520-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Family members can provide crucial support to individuals participating in clinical trials. In research on the "newest frontier" of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)-the use of DBS for psychiatric conditions-family member support is frequently listed as a criterion for trial enrollment. Despite the significance of family members, qualitative ethics research on DBS for psychiatric conditions has focused almost exclusively on the perspectives and experiences of DBS recipients. This qualitative study is one of the first to include both DBS recipients and their family members as interview participants. Using dyadic thematic analysis-an approach that takes both the individuals and the relationship as units of analyses-this study analyzes the complex ways in which family relationships can affect DBS trial participation, and how DBS trial participation in turn influences family relationships. Based on these findings, we propose ways to improve study designs to better take family relationships into account, and better support family members in taking on the complex, essential roles that they play in DBS trials for psychiatric conditions.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12152-023-09520-7.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭成员在精神病深部脑刺激试验中的作用:不仅仅是心理社会支持。
家庭成员可以为参与临床试验的个人提供重要支持。在对深部脑刺激(DBS)“最新前沿”的研究中,使用DBS治疗精神疾病——家庭成员支持经常被列为试验入选的标准。尽管家庭成员具有重要意义,但对DBS治疗精神疾病的定性伦理研究几乎完全集中在DBS接受者的观点和经历上。这项定性研究是首次将DBS接受者及其家庭成员纳入访谈参与者的研究之一。本研究采用二元主题分析法,以个人和关系为分析单位,分析了家庭关系影响DBS试验参与的复杂方式,以及DBS试验参与如何反过来影响家庭关系。基于这些发现,我们提出了改进研究设计的方法,以更好地考虑家庭关系,并更好地支持家庭成员在DBS精神病试验中发挥复杂而重要的作用。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,请访问10.1007/s12152-023-09520-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroethics
Neuroethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroethics is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to academic articles on the ethical, legal, political, social and philosophical questions provoked by research in the contemporary sciences of the mind and brain; especially, but not only, neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology. The journal publishes articles on questions raised by the sciences of the brain and mind, and on the ways in which the sciences of the brain and mind illuminate longstanding debates in ethics and philosophy.
期刊最新文献
Responding to existential distress at the end of life: Psychedelics and psychedelic experiences and/ as medicine Deep Brain Stimulation for Consciousness Disorders; Technical and Ethical Considerations Neurorights, Mental Privacy, and Mind Reading A Transformative Trip? Experiences of Psychedelic Use Neurotechnological Applications and the Protection of Mental Privacy: An Assessment of Risks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1