Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation Of Painful Residual Limb Neuroma In Individuals With Limb Amputation-A Retrospective Case Series.

S Guo, R Mansour, D Henderson Slater
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation Of Painful Residual Limb Neuroma In Individuals With Limb Amputation-A Retrospective Case Series.","authors":"S Guo,&nbsp;R Mansour,&nbsp;D Henderson Slater","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.33061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residual limb neuromas are a significant cause of post-amputation pain. There is little knowledge concerning ultrasound-guided (US) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate US-guided RFA for neuroma associated pain in individuals with limb amputation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The notes of nine consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Information obtained included neuroma size and nerve, RFA duration/temperature, pain scores, analgesic requirements and ease/comfort of prosthetic use. Eight patients had lower-limb amputations and one had a trans-radial amputation. All except one, underwent diagnostic US-guided steroid injection to confirm the neuroma as the source of pain, prior to RFA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six patients reported significant reduction in pain scores (defined as at least 50% reduction) and an improvement in comfort/ease of wearing their prosthetic limb, with no adverse effects. Three of these six patients also reported a reduction in analgesic requirements. Of the three remaining patients - one had a large sciatic nerve neuroma that was eventually surgically excised, another had confounding pain from an adjacent bony spur, whilst the third patient did not receive a routine diagnostic steroid injection prior to RFA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that US-guided RFA is safe and effective for small to medium-sized residual limb neuroma associated pain in individuals with limb amputation. It can reduce pain and analgesic requirements, improve comfort/ease of wearing the prosthesis and potentially avoid surgical excision. We recommend patients should undergo a diagnostic steroid injection prior to RFA to confirm that the neuroma is the source of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"33061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443475/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.33061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Residual limb neuromas are a significant cause of post-amputation pain. There is little knowledge concerning ultrasound-guided (US) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as treatment.

Objective: To investigate US-guided RFA for neuroma associated pain in individuals with limb amputation.

Methodology: The notes of nine consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Information obtained included neuroma size and nerve, RFA duration/temperature, pain scores, analgesic requirements and ease/comfort of prosthetic use. Eight patients had lower-limb amputations and one had a trans-radial amputation. All except one, underwent diagnostic US-guided steroid injection to confirm the neuroma as the source of pain, prior to RFA.

Results: Six patients reported significant reduction in pain scores (defined as at least 50% reduction) and an improvement in comfort/ease of wearing their prosthetic limb, with no adverse effects. Three of these six patients also reported a reduction in analgesic requirements. Of the three remaining patients - one had a large sciatic nerve neuroma that was eventually surgically excised, another had confounding pain from an adjacent bony spur, whilst the third patient did not receive a routine diagnostic steroid injection prior to RFA.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that US-guided RFA is safe and effective for small to medium-sized residual limb neuroma associated pain in individuals with limb amputation. It can reduce pain and analgesic requirements, improve comfort/ease of wearing the prosthesis and potentially avoid surgical excision. We recommend patients should undergo a diagnostic steroid injection prior to RFA to confirm that the neuroma is the source of pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下持续射频消融术治疗肢体截肢患者疼痛性残肢神经瘤——回顾性病例系列。
背景:残肢神经瘤是截肢后疼痛的重要原因。关于超声引导(US)射频消融(RFA)作为治疗方法的知识很少。目的:探讨us引导下射频消融术治疗截肢患者神经瘤相关性疼痛的疗效。方法:回顾性分析连续9例患者的病历。获得的信息包括神经瘤大小和神经、RFA持续时间/温度、疼痛评分、镇痛需求和假体使用的易用性/舒适性。8例患者下肢截肢,1例经桡骨截肢。除1例外,所有患者在RFA前均接受了美国引导下的类固醇注射诊断,以确认神经瘤是疼痛的来源。结果:6名患者报告疼痛评分显著降低(定义为至少减少50%),佩戴假肢的舒适度/易用性得到改善,无不良反应。这6名患者中的3名也报告了镇痛需求的减少。剩下的三名患者中,一名患有大的坐骨神经瘤,最终手术切除,另一名患有邻近骨刺的混淆性疼痛,而第三名患者在RFA之前没有接受常规的诊断性类固醇注射。结论:我们的研究结果表明,us引导的RFA对于截肢患者的中小型残肢神经瘤相关疼痛是安全有效的。它可以减少疼痛和镇痛需求,提高佩戴假体的舒适性/易用性,并可能避免手术切除。我们建议患者在RFA前接受诊断性类固醇注射,以确认神经瘤是疼痛的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector. Development and evaluation of an anteriorly mounted microprocessor-controlled powered hip joint prosthesis. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Iranian orthotists and prosthetists: A study on work-related quality of life. Prosthetist Knowledge and 3D Printing. Overcoming barriers to cycling for knee disarticulation and transfemoral prosthesis users: A pilot study in The Netherlands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1