Experiences of Latino Participants Receiving Neutral Genomic Screening Results: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2021-02-16 DOI:10.1159/000513219
Amal W Cheema, Erica J Sutton, Annika T Beck, Idali Cuellar, Giovanna G Moreno Garzon, Valentina Hernandez, Noralane M Lindor, Gabriel Q Shaibi, Iftikhar J Kullo, Richard R Sharp
{"title":"Experiences of Latino Participants Receiving Neutral Genomic Screening Results: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Amal W Cheema, Erica J Sutton, Annika T Beck, Idali Cuellar, Giovanna G Moreno Garzon, Valentina Hernandez, Noralane M Lindor, Gabriel Q Shaibi, Iftikhar J Kullo, Richard R Sharp","doi":"10.1159/000513219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to characterize experiences of Latino participants receiving genomic screening results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited at a federally qualified health center in the USA. In-person, semi-structured interviews were conducted in either Spanish or English by a bilingual, bicultural interviewer. Questions focused on motivations for pursuing genomic sequencing, concerns about receiving genomic screening results, and perceived benefits of receiving genomic information. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty individuals completed an interview; 39 were conducted in Spanish. Participants described mixed motivations for pursuing genomic screening. Participants viewed the benefits of genomic screening in relation to not only their personal health but to the health of their families and their communities. Participants tended to have few concerns about genomic screening. Those concerns related to potential loss of privacy, misuses of genomic information, and the possibility of receiving distressing results. Some participants had misunderstandings about the scope of the test and the potential implications of their results. Most felt it was better to know about a genetic predisposition to disease than to remain uninformed. Participants felt that genomic screening was worthwhile.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is one of the first studies to examine the experiences of Latino individuals receiving genomic screening results. Our results suggest that many Latino patients in the US see value in genomic screening and have limited concerns about its potential to cause harm. These results inform ongoing efforts to increase the availability of genomic medicine to underrepresented populations and add to our understanding of sociocultural drivers in the adoption of precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291848/pdf/nihms-1910442.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000513219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to characterize experiences of Latino participants receiving genomic screening results.

Methods: Participants were recruited at a federally qualified health center in the USA. In-person, semi-structured interviews were conducted in either Spanish or English by a bilingual, bicultural interviewer. Questions focused on motivations for pursuing genomic sequencing, concerns about receiving genomic screening results, and perceived benefits of receiving genomic information. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated.

Results: Fifty individuals completed an interview; 39 were conducted in Spanish. Participants described mixed motivations for pursuing genomic screening. Participants viewed the benefits of genomic screening in relation to not only their personal health but to the health of their families and their communities. Participants tended to have few concerns about genomic screening. Those concerns related to potential loss of privacy, misuses of genomic information, and the possibility of receiving distressing results. Some participants had misunderstandings about the scope of the test and the potential implications of their results. Most felt it was better to know about a genetic predisposition to disease than to remain uninformed. Participants felt that genomic screening was worthwhile.

Discussion: This is one of the first studies to examine the experiences of Latino individuals receiving genomic screening results. Our results suggest that many Latino patients in the US see value in genomic screening and have limited concerns about its potential to cause harm. These results inform ongoing efforts to increase the availability of genomic medicine to underrepresented populations and add to our understanding of sociocultural drivers in the adoption of precision medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁裔参与者接受中性基因组筛查结果的经历:定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在了解拉丁裔参与者在接受基因组筛查结果时的经历:方法:在美国一家联邦合格医疗中心招募参与者。由一名双语、双文化采访者以西班牙语或英语进行面对面的半结构化采访。问题主要集中在寻求基因组测序的动机、对接收基因组筛查结果的担忧以及对接收基因组信息所带来的益处的看法。访谈进行了录音、转录和翻译:结果:50 人完成了访谈,其中 39 人的访谈用西班牙语进行。参加者对进行基因组筛查的动机描述不一。参与者认为基因组筛查的益处不仅关系到其个人健康,还关系到其家庭和社区的健康。参与者对基因组筛查的担忧往往很少。这些顾虑涉及潜在的隐私损失、基因组信息的滥用以及可能收到令人痛苦的结果。一些参与者对检测的范围及其结果的潜在影响存在误解。大多数人认为,了解遗传易感性比不了解情况要好。参与者认为基因组筛查是值得的:讨论:这是首批研究拉丁裔患者接受基因组筛查结果的经历的研究之一。我们的研究结果表明,美国的许多拉丁裔患者认为基因组筛查很有价值,对其可能造成的伤害也不太担心。这些结果为我们正在进行的提高基因组医学对代表性不足人群的可用性的工作提供了信息,并加深了我们对采用精准医学的社会文化驱动因素的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
期刊最新文献
"The Biggest Struggle:" Navigating Trust and Uncertainty in Genetic Variant Interpretation. "Should I let them know I have this?": Multifaceted genetic discrimination and limited awareness of legal protections amongst individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes. Who's on your genomics research team? Consumer experiences from Australia. Development and Pilot Testing of Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Adherence after Receiving a Genetic Result. Co-creating the experience of consent for newborn genome sequencing (The Generation Study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1