Cognition and post-concussive symptom status after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Child Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-24 DOI:10.1080/09297049.2023.2181946
Cidney R Robertson-Benta, Sharvani Pabbathi Reddy, David D Stephenson, Veronik Sicard, Danielle C Hergert, Andrew B Dodd, Richard A Campbell, John P Phillips, Timothy B Meier, Davin K Quinn, Andrew R Mayer
{"title":"Cognition and post-concussive symptom status after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Cidney R Robertson-Benta, Sharvani Pabbathi Reddy, David D Stephenson, Veronik Sicard, Danielle C Hergert, Andrew B Dodd, Richard A Campbell, John P Phillips, Timothy B Meier, Davin K Quinn, Andrew R Mayer","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2023.2181946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment and post-concussive symptoms (PCS) represent hallmark sequelae of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI). Few studies have directly compared cognition as a function of PCS status longitudinally. Cognitive outcomes were therefore compared for asymptomatic pmTBI, symptomatic pmTBI, and healthy controls (HC) during sub-acute (SA; 1-11 days) and early chronic (EC; approximately 4 months) post-injury phases. We predicted worse cognitive performance for both pmTBI groups relative to HC at the SA visit. At the EC visit, we predicted continued impairment from the symptomatic group, but no difference between asymptomatic pmTBI and HCs. A battery of clinical (semi-structured interviews and self-report questionnaires) and neuropsychological measures were administered to 203 pmTBI and 139 HC participants, with greater than 80% retention at the EC visit. A standardized change method classified pmTBI into binary categories of asymptomatic or symptomatic based on PCS scores. Symptomatic pmTBI performed significantly worse than HCs on processing speed, attention, and verbal memory at SA visit, whereas lower performance was only present for verbal memory for asymptomatic pmTBI. Lower performance in verbal memory persisted for both pmTBI groups at the EC visit. Surprisingly, a minority (16%) of pmTBI switched from asymptomatic to symptomatic status at the EC visit. Current findings suggest that PCS and cognition are more closely coupled during the first week of injury but become decoupled several months post-injury. Evidence of lower performance in verbal memory for both asymptomatic and symptomatic pmTBI suggests that cognitive recovery may be a process separate from the resolution of subjective symptomology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"203-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2023.2181946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive impairment and post-concussive symptoms (PCS) represent hallmark sequelae of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI). Few studies have directly compared cognition as a function of PCS status longitudinally. Cognitive outcomes were therefore compared for asymptomatic pmTBI, symptomatic pmTBI, and healthy controls (HC) during sub-acute (SA; 1-11 days) and early chronic (EC; approximately 4 months) post-injury phases. We predicted worse cognitive performance for both pmTBI groups relative to HC at the SA visit. At the EC visit, we predicted continued impairment from the symptomatic group, but no difference between asymptomatic pmTBI and HCs. A battery of clinical (semi-structured interviews and self-report questionnaires) and neuropsychological measures were administered to 203 pmTBI and 139 HC participants, with greater than 80% retention at the EC visit. A standardized change method classified pmTBI into binary categories of asymptomatic or symptomatic based on PCS scores. Symptomatic pmTBI performed significantly worse than HCs on processing speed, attention, and verbal memory at SA visit, whereas lower performance was only present for verbal memory for asymptomatic pmTBI. Lower performance in verbal memory persisted for both pmTBI groups at the EC visit. Surprisingly, a minority (16%) of pmTBI switched from asymptomatic to symptomatic status at the EC visit. Current findings suggest that PCS and cognition are more closely coupled during the first week of injury but become decoupled several months post-injury. Evidence of lower performance in verbal memory for both asymptomatic and symptomatic pmTBI suggests that cognitive recovery may be a process separate from the resolution of subjective symptomology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿轻度脑外伤后的认知和脑震荡后症状状况。
认知障碍和撞击后症状(PCS)是小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤(pmTBI)的标志性后遗症。很少有研究直接将认知功能与 PCS 状态进行纵向比较。因此,我们比较了无症状 pmTBI、有症状 pmTBI 和健康对照组(HC)在伤后亚急性(SA;1-11 天)和早期慢性(EC;约 4 个月)阶段的认知结果。我们预测,在亚急性阶段,pmTBI 两组患者的认知能力都比健康对照组差。在慢性阶段,我们预测有症状组的认知能力会继续受损,但无症状 pmTBI 和 HC 之间没有差异。我们对 203 名 pmTBI 和 139 名 HC 参与者进行了一系列临床(半结构化访谈和自我报告问卷)和神经心理测量,在 EC 访问时,他们的保留率超过了 80%。一种标准化的变化方法根据 PCS 分数将 pmTBI 分成无症状和有症状两种二元类别。有症状的 pmTBI 在处理速度、注意力和言语记忆方面的表现在 SA 访问时明显低于 HC,而无症状的 pmTBI 仅在言语记忆方面表现较差。在EC就诊时,两组pmTBI患者的言语记忆能力均持续较低。令人惊讶的是,少数(16%)pmTBI 在 EC 就诊时从无症状状态转为有症状状态。目前的研究结果表明,在受伤后的第一周,PCS 与认知之间的联系更为紧密,但在受伤后的几个月,两者之间的联系逐渐减弱。有证据表明,无症状和有症状的 pmTBI 患者的言语记忆能力都较低,这表明认知能力的恢复可能是一个独立于主观症状缓解的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive performance, psychiatric comorbidities, and quality of life in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a comparative analysis with healthy controls. Development of inattention and executive dysfunction in youth with spina bifida: condition severity variables as predictors. Evidence of validity of the Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders Revised (HTKS-R) for Brazilian children. Early life parechovirus infection neuropsychological outcomes at 8 years: a cohort study. Validation of the autism behavior checklist in Egyptian children with autism spectrum disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1