Evaluation of a Suicide Prevention Program Encompassing Both Student and Teacher Training Components.

Katharina Bockhoff, Wolfgang Ellermeier, Simone Bruder
{"title":"Evaluation of a Suicide Prevention Program Encompassing Both Student and Teacher Training Components.","authors":"Katharina Bockhoff,&nbsp;Wolfgang Ellermeier,&nbsp;Simone Bruder","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Although suicide prevention programs have been shown to change suicide-related knowledge and attitudes, relatively little is known about their effects on actual behavior. <i>Aims:</i> Therefore, the focus of the present study was on improving participating school staff's practical and communication skills. <i>Method:</i> Suicide prevention workshops for students in grades 8-10 (<i>N</i> = 200) and a gatekeeper training program for school staff (<i>N</i> = 150) were conducted in 12 secondary schools in Germany. Schools were alternately assigned to one of three interventions (staff, students, or both trained) or to a waitlist control group. <i>Results:</i> School staff undergoing the training showed increased action-related knowledge, greater self-efficacy when counseling students in need and augmented counseling skills, and also had more conversations with students in need. Although students participating in the workshops did not seek help more frequently, they provided help to their peers more often in the conditions in which both students and school staff or only the latter had been trained. <i>Limitations:</i> The generalizability of the results is constrained by high dropout rates due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the relatively small sample size. <i>Conclusion:</i> A combination of suicide prevention programs for school staff and students appears to be most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"44 4","pages":"276-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448894/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Although suicide prevention programs have been shown to change suicide-related knowledge and attitudes, relatively little is known about their effects on actual behavior. Aims: Therefore, the focus of the present study was on improving participating school staff's practical and communication skills. Method: Suicide prevention workshops for students in grades 8-10 (N = 200) and a gatekeeper training program for school staff (N = 150) were conducted in 12 secondary schools in Germany. Schools were alternately assigned to one of three interventions (staff, students, or both trained) or to a waitlist control group. Results: School staff undergoing the training showed increased action-related knowledge, greater self-efficacy when counseling students in need and augmented counseling skills, and also had more conversations with students in need. Although students participating in the workshops did not seek help more frequently, they provided help to their peers more often in the conditions in which both students and school staff or only the latter had been trained. Limitations: The generalizability of the results is constrained by high dropout rates due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the relatively small sample size. Conclusion: A combination of suicide prevention programs for school staff and students appears to be most effective.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包括学生和教师培训组成部分的自杀预防计划的评估。
背景:虽然自杀预防项目已经被证明可以改变与自杀有关的知识和态度,但相对而言,人们对其对实际行为的影响知之甚少。目的:因此,本研究的重点是提高参与学校员工的实践能力和沟通能力。方法:对德国12所中学的8-10年级学生(N = 200)进行自杀预防讲习班,对学校工作人员(N = 150)进行看门人培训。学校被交替分配到三种干预措施中的一种(教师、学生或两者都接受了培训),或者被分配到一个等候名单控制组。结果:接受培训的学校工作人员在辅导困难学生时表现出更多的行动相关知识、更强的自我效能感和更强的辅导技能,与困难学生的对话也更多。虽然参加讲习班的学生没有更频繁地寻求帮助,但在学生和学校工作人员或只有学校工作人员接受过培训的情况下,他们更经常地向同龄人提供帮助。局限性:由于COVID-19大流行导致的高辍学率和相对较小的样本量,限制了结果的普遍性。结论:针对学校员工和学生的自杀预防计划的结合似乎是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation According to Occupation and Other Employment Variables. Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide. Exploring the Influence of Masculine Norms on Suicidal Ideation and Help-Seeking Behavior. Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging. Using Real-Time Coronial Data to Detect Spatiotemporal Suicide Clusters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1