Baricitinib versus tocilizumab in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1002/phar.2867
Grace M Conroy, Seth R Bauer, Andrea M Pallotta, Abhijit Duggal, Lu Wang, Gretchen L Sacha
{"title":"Baricitinib versus tocilizumab in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Grace M Conroy, Seth R Bauer, Andrea M Pallotta, Abhijit Duggal, Lu Wang, Gretchen L Sacha","doi":"10.1002/phar.2867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The immunomodulators tocilizumab and baricitinib improve outcomes in severely ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, comparative analyses of clinical outcomes related to these agents are lacking. A tocilizumab national shortage shifted treatment to baricitinib in critically ill patients, allowing for an outcome comparison in a similar population. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients who received tocilizumab and those who received baricitinib.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational cohort study using generalized estimating equation models, accounting for clustering by hospital and known confounders, to estimate the proportional odds of the ordinal World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS) score at day 14, the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included WHO-CPS score at day 7.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multiple hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Health System.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients admitted for COVID-19 between January 2021 and November 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Receipt of tocilizumab, before its shortage, or baricitinib, during shortage.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In total, 507 patients were included; 217 received tocilizumab and 290 received baricitinib. Over 96% of patients required ICU admission and 98% received concomitant dexamethasone. Tocilizumab recipients had higher (worse) baseline WHO-CPS scores. After adjustment, tocilizumab use was associated with higher odds of a worse day 14 WHO-CPS score compared with baricitinib (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.48]). Similarly, after adjustment, tocilizumab use was associated with higher odds of a worse day 7 WHO-CPS score (adjusted OR 1.65 [95% CI 1.22-2.24]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baricitinib use was associated with better WHO-CPS scores at day 14 and day 7 compared with tocilizumab in a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19. The odds of having a one unit increase in WHO-CPS score at day 14 was 71% higher with tocilizumab than baricitinib. No difference in mortality or adverse effects was noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2867","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The immunomodulators tocilizumab and baricitinib improve outcomes in severely ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, comparative analyses of clinical outcomes related to these agents are lacking. A tocilizumab national shortage shifted treatment to baricitinib in critically ill patients, allowing for an outcome comparison in a similar population. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients who received tocilizumab and those who received baricitinib.

Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study using generalized estimating equation models, accounting for clustering by hospital and known confounders, to estimate the proportional odds of the ordinal World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS) score at day 14, the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included WHO-CPS score at day 7.

Setting: Multiple hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Health System.

Patients: Adult patients admitted for COVID-19 between January 2021 and November 2021.

Interventions: Receipt of tocilizumab, before its shortage, or baricitinib, during shortage.

Measurements and main results: In total, 507 patients were included; 217 received tocilizumab and 290 received baricitinib. Over 96% of patients required ICU admission and 98% received concomitant dexamethasone. Tocilizumab recipients had higher (worse) baseline WHO-CPS scores. After adjustment, tocilizumab use was associated with higher odds of a worse day 14 WHO-CPS score compared with baricitinib (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.48]). Similarly, after adjustment, tocilizumab use was associated with higher odds of a worse day 7 WHO-CPS score (adjusted OR 1.65 [95% CI 1.22-2.24]).

Conclusions: Baricitinib use was associated with better WHO-CPS scores at day 14 and day 7 compared with tocilizumab in a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19. The odds of having a one unit increase in WHO-CPS score at day 14 was 71% higher with tocilizumab than baricitinib. No difference in mortality or adverse effects was noted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19重症患者中的巴利替尼与托珠单抗:回顾性队列研究
目的:免疫调节剂托西珠单抗和巴利替尼能改善2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)重症患者的预后;然而,目前还缺乏与这些药物相关的临床预后比较分析。托西珠单抗的全国性短缺使重症患者的治疗转向巴利昔尼,从而可以在类似人群中进行结果比较。本研究旨在比较接受托西珠单抗和巴利替尼治疗的COVID-19重症患者的临床疗效:设计:回顾性观察队列研究,使用广义估计方程模型,考虑医院分组和已知混杂因素,估计第14天世界卫生组织临床进展量表(WHO-CPS)评分的比例几率,这是主要结果。次要结果包括第7天的WHO-CPS评分:克利夫兰诊所医疗系统内的多家医院:患者:2021年1月至2021年11月期间因COVID-19入院的成人患者:干预措施:在托西珠单抗短缺前接受托西珠单抗治疗,或在巴利昔尼短缺期间接受巴利昔尼治疗:共纳入507例患者,其中217例接受托西珠单抗治疗,290例接受巴利替尼治疗。96%以上的患者需要入住重症监护室,98%的患者同时接受地塞米松治疗。接受托西珠单抗治疗的患者的基线WHO-CPS评分更高(更差)。经调整后,与巴利昔尼相比,使用妥昔单抗与第14天WHO-CPS评分更差的几率更高(调整后的几率比[OR] 1.65 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.10-2.48])。同样,经过调整后,使用托西珠单抗与第7天WHO-CPS评分恶化的几率更高相关(调整后的OR为1.65 [95% CI为1.22-2.24]):结论:在一组COVID-19重症患者中,与托珠单抗相比,使用巴利昔尼可改善第14天和第7天的WHO-CPS评分。在第14天时,托西珠单抗的WHO-CPS评分增加一个单位的几率比巴利替尼高71%。死亡率或不良反应方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Cannabinoids for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review. ECLIPSES: Early initiation of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes following acute coronary syndrome and subsequent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Sex differences in LDL-C reduction response to evolocumab: A propensity score matching analysis. Association between gastroprotective agents and acute kidney injury in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Analysis of a Japanese hospital-based database. Albuminuria-based stratification of end-stage kidney disease progression and mortality with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i): A retrospective cohort study in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1