Review of Prosthetics & Orthotics Needs for 21st Century - Vision for 2025.

S Zahedi
{"title":"Review of Prosthetics & Orthotics Needs for 21st Century - Vision for 2025.","authors":"S Zahedi","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.37113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What would we do, if only we had the power to go back?! The best way to consider this is to align and join all the known dots. To think of Prosthetics and Orthotics (P&O) as a system holistically centred around care of the user, identifying all their needs continuously, in their environment and in their lifestyle. This could produce a new value proposition for all multi-disciplinary team members by generating patient-centred therapeutic benefits and clinical outcomes that align all stakeholders in P&O towards using a common narrative, which makes decisions based on data. In this case, data is the outcome, using Standards and Instruments which are validated (e.g. www.amprom.uk) to quantify questions such as: \"Have we reduce risk of falls?\", \"Have we reduced risk of tissue injury?\", \"Have we reduced risk of low back pain?\", \"Have we reduced long term risk of osteoarthritis?\", etc. If we have, we are assured this will benefit the comfort and confidence for the user. We can have confidence in rehabilitation measured by improved stability and increased activity, and other measures which enable the accurate classification of products and services to match users. A prescription index, based on Outcomes, could, for example, be calculated by a formula which accounts for the percentage reduction in falls probability, a patient satisfaction score, a mobility score and a quality-of-life score, allowing practitioners to base their choices of treatment pathways and component selection. This paper provides both the context for and contributing factors that make the proposing of such an objective Prescription Index an interesting thing to consider when discussing Health Economics in P&O.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"37113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443484/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.37113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What would we do, if only we had the power to go back?! The best way to consider this is to align and join all the known dots. To think of Prosthetics and Orthotics (P&O) as a system holistically centred around care of the user, identifying all their needs continuously, in their environment and in their lifestyle. This could produce a new value proposition for all multi-disciplinary team members by generating patient-centred therapeutic benefits and clinical outcomes that align all stakeholders in P&O towards using a common narrative, which makes decisions based on data. In this case, data is the outcome, using Standards and Instruments which are validated (e.g. www.amprom.uk) to quantify questions such as: "Have we reduce risk of falls?", "Have we reduced risk of tissue injury?", "Have we reduced risk of low back pain?", "Have we reduced long term risk of osteoarthritis?", etc. If we have, we are assured this will benefit the comfort and confidence for the user. We can have confidence in rehabilitation measured by improved stability and increased activity, and other measures which enable the accurate classification of products and services to match users. A prescription index, based on Outcomes, could, for example, be calculated by a formula which accounts for the percentage reduction in falls probability, a patient satisfaction score, a mobility score and a quality-of-life score, allowing practitioners to base their choices of treatment pathways and component selection. This paper provides both the context for and contributing factors that make the proposing of such an objective Prescription Index an interesting thing to consider when discussing Health Economics in P&O.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21世纪义肢与矫形器需求综述- 2025年展望。
如果我们有能力回到过去,我们会怎么做!考虑这个问题的最佳方法是将所有已知的点对齐并连接起来。将假肢和矫形术(P&O)视为一个以用户护理为中心的整体系统,在他们的环境和生活方式中不断识别他们的所有需求。通过产生以患者为中心的治疗益处和临床结果,使P&O中的所有利益相关者一致使用共同的叙述,从而根据数据做出决策,这可以为所有多学科团队成员产生新的价值主张。在这种情况下,数据就是结果,使用经过验证的标准和工具(例如www.amprom.uk)来量化问题,例如:“我们是否降低了跌倒的风险?”,“我们是否降低了组织损伤的风险?”,“我们是否降低了腰痛的风险?”,“我们是否降低了骨关节炎的长期风险?”等等。如果我们有,我们确信这将有利于用户的舒适度和信心。我们可以对康复有信心,通过改善稳定性和增加活动,以及其他能够准确分类产品和服务以匹配用户的措施来衡量。例如,基于结果的处方指数可以通过一个公式来计算,该公式考虑了跌倒概率减少的百分比、患者满意度评分、活动能力评分和生活质量评分,从而使从业者能够基于他们对治疗途径和成分选择的选择。本文提供了背景和影响因素,使提出这样一个客观的处方指数是一个有趣的事情,当讨论卫生经济学P&O考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector. Development and evaluation of an anteriorly mounted microprocessor-controlled powered hip joint prosthesis. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Iranian orthotists and prosthetists: A study on work-related quality of life. Prosthetist Knowledge and 3D Printing. Overcoming barriers to cycling for knee disarticulation and transfemoral prosthesis users: A pilot study in The Netherlands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1