Accuracy and availability of automated urine output monitoring in the operating room using a smart scale

Abstract

Purpose

Urine output (UO) is an important intraoperative parameter that is not yet electronically monitored. We compared an automatic urinometer (AU) based on a smart scale with a manual urinometer (MU).

Patients and methods

This prospective study investigated the hourly UO of 35 preoperative patients with an indwelling urinary catheter using AU, MU, and cylinder measurements. Data were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. A questionnaire related to the use of the AU was completed by medical staff (n=25).

Results

Compared to the cylinder measurements, the differences in measurements by the AU and the MU were −6.31 ​± ​15.03 ​mL/h (p=0.018) and 20.26 ​± ​26.81 ​mL/h (p=0.001), respectively. The r values for the comparison of cylinder measurements with AU and MU values were 0.985 (p<0.001) and 0.968 (p<0.001), respectively. Bland-Altman analyses showed that cylinder measurements had better agreement with the AU measurements than with the MU measurements. Also, the medical staff reported that the use of the AU was easier to learn than the use of the MU (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Compared to the MU values, AU values were noninferior; they had significantly less bias and temporal deviation. Additionally, the medical staff reported that the use of the AU was easier to learn than the use of the MU.