Overestimation of Balance Ability Among Older Adults at Risk for Falls.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging and Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1177/08982643231186630
Edmund C Ickert, Tiffany Hughes, Cara A Berg-Carramusa, Shannon Dudash, Lucy Kerns
{"title":"Overestimation of Balance Ability Among Older Adults at Risk for Falls.","authors":"Edmund C Ickert, Tiffany Hughes, Cara A Berg-Carramusa, Shannon Dudash, Lucy Kerns","doi":"10.1177/08982643231186630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study examined alignment of subjective balance confidence with Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) fall risk. <b>Methods:</b> Cross-sectional analysis of 155 community-dwelling adults (60 + y/o) from 2016 to 2018 who completed a STEADI fall assessment. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square analysis, and biserial point correlations were applied. <b>Results:</b> Adults who overestimate balance confidence, 55.6% (<i>n</i> = 50) reported a fall in the past year, 62.2% (<i>n</i> = 56) were worried about falling, 48.9% (<i>n</i> = 44) felt unsteady when standing/walking, and 70.0% (<i>n</i> = 63) had a score of ≥4 on the Stay Independent Questionnaire (SIQ). Physical performance for these adults were mean TUG score 10.9s (SD = 3.4), mean 30 second chair stands 10.8 (SD = 3.5), and mean 4-stage balance score 3.1 (SD = .76). <b>Discussion:</b> Older adults are more likely to overestimate their subjective balance confidence. Individuals are equally likely to have reported a fall in the past year if they were \"at fall risk,\" regardless of their subjective balance confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"286-298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643231186630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined alignment of subjective balance confidence with Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) fall risk. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 155 community-dwelling adults (60 + y/o) from 2016 to 2018 who completed a STEADI fall assessment. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square analysis, and biserial point correlations were applied. Results: Adults who overestimate balance confidence, 55.6% (n = 50) reported a fall in the past year, 62.2% (n = 56) were worried about falling, 48.9% (n = 44) felt unsteady when standing/walking, and 70.0% (n = 63) had a score of ≥4 on the Stay Independent Questionnaire (SIQ). Physical performance for these adults were mean TUG score 10.9s (SD = 3.4), mean 30 second chair stands 10.8 (SD = 3.5), and mean 4-stage balance score 3.1 (SD = .76). Discussion: Older adults are more likely to overestimate their subjective balance confidence. Individuals are equally likely to have reported a fall in the past year if they were "at fall risk," regardless of their subjective balance confidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高估有跌倒风险的老年人的平衡能力。
研究目的本研究探讨了主观平衡信心与 "制止老年人意外事故、死亡和伤害(STEADI)"跌倒风险的一致性。研究方法对2016年至2018年期间完成STEADI跌倒评估的155名社区居住成年人(60岁以上/o)进行横断面分析。应用了描述性统计、Chi-Square分析和双星点相关性分析。结果显示高估平衡信心的成年人中,55.6%(n = 50)报告在过去一年中跌倒过,62.2%(n = 56)担心跌倒,48.9%(n = 44)在站立/行走时感觉不稳,70.0%(n = 63)在保持独立问卷(SIQ)中得分≥4。这些成年人的体能表现为平均 TUG 得分 10.9 秒(标准差 = 3.4),平均 30 秒椅子站立得分 10.8(标准差 = 3.5),平均 4 阶段平衡得分 3.1(标准差 = 0.76)。讨论老年人更容易高估自己的主观平衡信心。无论其主观平衡信心如何,如果他们 "有跌倒风险",那么在过去一年中报告跌倒的可能性是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood Built Environments and Health in Later Life: A Literature Review. Age Changes in Religious Service Attendance in Mexican American Older Adults: A Growth Curve Analysis. Coping with Discrimination: A Longitudinal Study of Health Outcomes in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual and Heterosexual Midlife and Older Adults. An Exploration of Methods to Resolve Inconsistent Self-Reporting of Chronic Conditions and Impact on Multimorbidity in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Exploring the Characteristics of Men Aged 55+ Who Use Mental Health Community Care and Support Services: A Secondary Analysis of the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Study in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1