Drug allergy in primary care: systematic review to support quality improvement initiative of management and optimization of healthcare pathways.

Clara Gaudin, Dermot Ryan, Pascal Demoly, Luciana Kase Tanno
{"title":"Drug allergy in primary care: systematic review to support quality improvement initiative of management and optimization of healthcare pathways.","authors":"Clara Gaudin,&nbsp;Dermot Ryan,&nbsp;Pascal Demoly,&nbsp;Luciana Kase Tanno","doi":"10.1097/ACI.0000000000000924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this study was to review the practice of general practitioners (GPs) in regard to the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to identify major challenges and to facilitate the development of decision support tools to GPs confronted with DHRs patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>DHRs are still a challenge in the GPs clinical practice, which implies difficulties in clinical decisions and referral to allergy specialists.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>DHRs can range from mild to severe and even life-threatening. Drugs are the main cause of anaphylaxis deaths in most countries. Most DHRs are firstly seen by GPs, paediatricians or emergency doctors. However, our systematic review demonstrated difficulties in differentiating DHRs from other drug side effects. Most DHRs epidemiological data are from hospital and emergency departments, which may not reflect the real-life experience in primary care. GPs should be aware of the alert signs of DHRs: the involvement of other systems beyond the skin and/or atypical skin/ mucosal involvement, which mandated immediate referral to an emergency department. Data still stress difficulties in the recognition of DHRs clinical manifestations and highlight the need for decision aids to support their management by GPs. Structured clinical history and clinical examination are key diagnostic tools. Reasons for referring to allergy specialists based on the literature are to investigate cause, to undergo specific procedure, such as desensitization and to identify well tolerated, alternative drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10956,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":"23 4","pages":"263-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this study was to review the practice of general practitioners (GPs) in regard to the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to identify major challenges and to facilitate the development of decision support tools to GPs confronted with DHRs patients.

Recent findings: DHRs are still a challenge in the GPs clinical practice, which implies difficulties in clinical decisions and referral to allergy specialists.

Summary: DHRs can range from mild to severe and even life-threatening. Drugs are the main cause of anaphylaxis deaths in most countries. Most DHRs are firstly seen by GPs, paediatricians or emergency doctors. However, our systematic review demonstrated difficulties in differentiating DHRs from other drug side effects. Most DHRs epidemiological data are from hospital and emergency departments, which may not reflect the real-life experience in primary care. GPs should be aware of the alert signs of DHRs: the involvement of other systems beyond the skin and/or atypical skin/ mucosal involvement, which mandated immediate referral to an emergency department. Data still stress difficulties in the recognition of DHRs clinical manifestations and highlight the need for decision aids to support their management by GPs. Structured clinical history and clinical examination are key diagnostic tools. Reasons for referring to allergy specialists based on the literature are to investigate cause, to undergo specific procedure, such as desensitization and to identify well tolerated, alternative drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物过敏在初级保健:系统评价,以支持质量改进倡议的管理和优化保健途径。
回顾目的:本研究的目的是回顾全科医生(gp)在药物超敏反应(DHRs)的诊断和管理方面的实践,以确定主要挑战,并促进全科医生面对DHRs患者的决策支持工具的开发。最新发现:在全科医生的临床实践中,dhr仍然是一个挑战,这意味着临床决策和转介给过敏专家的困难。总结:dhr可以从轻微到严重,甚至危及生命。在大多数国家,药物是过敏性死亡的主要原因。大多数dhr首先由全科医生、儿科医生或急诊医生就诊。然而,我们的系统综述表明,很难将dhr与其他药物副作用区分开来。大多数DHRs流行病学数据来自医院和急诊科,这可能不能反映初级保健的实际情况。全科医生应意识到DHRs的警报信号:累及皮肤以外的其他系统和/或非典型皮肤/粘膜累及,这要求立即转诊到急诊室。数据仍然强调识别DHRs临床表现的困难,并强调需要决策辅助来支持全科医生对其进行管理。结构化的临床病史和临床检查是诊断的关键工具。参考文献的过敏专家的原因是为了调查原因,进行特定的程序,如脱敏,并确定耐受性良好的替代药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This reader-friendly, bimonthly resource provides a powerful, broad-based perspective on the most important advances from throughout the world literature. Featuring renowned guest editors and focusing exclusively on one to three topics, every issue of Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology delivers unvarnished, expert assessments of developments from the previous year. Insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews cover key subjects such as upper airway disease; mechanisms of allergy and adult asthma; paediatric asthma and development of atopy; food and drug allergies; and immunotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Real-world evidence of allergen immunotherapy. eHealth in pediatric respiratory allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy at the extremes of age: below 5 years and elderly: evidence beyond indications? Liver disease in primary antibody deficiencies. Cost-effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1