"So There. I Won.": The Struggle for Power Between Caring and Carceral Institutions.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-25 DOI:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000401
Danisha Jenkins, Candace Burton, Dave Holmes
{"title":"\"So There. I Won.\": The Struggle for Power Between Caring and Carceral Institutions.","authors":"Danisha Jenkins,&nbsp;Candace Burton,&nbsp;Dave Holmes","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study were to give voice to the lived experiences of nurses and law enforcement officers (LEOs) who interact with one another in acute hospital settings and to interpret and understand their unique perspectives and experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study employed interpretative phenomenological analysis in the interviews of registered nurses and LEOs. The analysis and discussion was underpinned by biopolitical theories of power and control, including Georgio Agamben, Michel Foucault, and Erving Goffman.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a paucity of literature on nurse and law enforcement interactions in the hospital setting. Nurses and law enforcement exerted power and authority through several means. Overwhelmingly, participants described a contentious dynamic between nurses and LEOs in the hospital, wrought with argument, stress, and a feeling of coming from \"different worlds.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide alarming examples of deformed caring practices and assert the necessity for continued unearthing and discussion of how nurses can, and should, navigate law enforcement interaction. The tangible interference of care is of particular importance and consideration for nurses. Inequity in care and unfavorable outcomes for already marginalized and vulnerable populations are of grave concern. Additional research is needed on the specific ways this struggle for power between institutions and their political actors impairs caring practices and the emotional and psychological sequelae of these interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51324,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were to give voice to the lived experiences of nurses and law enforcement officers (LEOs) who interact with one another in acute hospital settings and to interpret and understand their unique perspectives and experiences.

Methods: This qualitative study employed interpretative phenomenological analysis in the interviews of registered nurses and LEOs. The analysis and discussion was underpinned by biopolitical theories of power and control, including Georgio Agamben, Michel Foucault, and Erving Goffman.

Results: There is a paucity of literature on nurse and law enforcement interactions in the hospital setting. Nurses and law enforcement exerted power and authority through several means. Overwhelmingly, participants described a contentious dynamic between nurses and LEOs in the hospital, wrought with argument, stress, and a feeling of coming from "different worlds."

Conclusion: The results provide alarming examples of deformed caring practices and assert the necessity for continued unearthing and discussion of how nurses can, and should, navigate law enforcement interaction. The tangible interference of care is of particular importance and consideration for nurses. Inequity in care and unfavorable outcomes for already marginalized and vulnerable populations are of grave concern. Additional research is needed on the specific ways this struggle for power between institutions and their political actors impairs caring practices and the emotional and psychological sequelae of these interactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“就这样。我赢了。”:护理和殡葬机构之间的权力斗争。
目的:本研究的目的是表达护士和执法人员在急性医院环境中相互交流的生活经历,并解释和理解他们独特的观点和经历。方法:采用解释性现象学分析方法对注册护士和低收入人群进行访谈。分析和讨论以权力和控制的生物政治理论为基础,包括Georgio Agamben、Michel Foucault和Erving Goffman。结果:关于医院环境中护士和执法互动的文献很少。护士和执法部门通过多种方式行使权力。绝大多数参与者描述了医院护士和低收入者之间的争论、压力和来自“不同世界”的感觉。结论:研究结果提供了畸形护理实践的惊人例子,并断言有必要继续挖掘和讨论护士如何以及应该如何驾驭执法互动。护理的实际干预对护士来说尤其重要和值得考虑。护理方面的不公平和对已经处于边缘地位和弱势群体的不利结果令人严重关切。需要进一步研究机构及其政治行为者之间的权力斗争如何损害关爱实践以及这些互动的情感和心理后遗症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Nursing (JFN) the official journal of the International Association of Forensic Nurses, is a groundbreaking publication that addresses health care issues that transcend health and legal systems by articulating nursing’s response to violence. The journal features empirical studies, review and theoretical articles, methodological and concept papers, and case reports that address the provision of care to victims and perpetrators of violence, trauma, and abuse. Topics include interpersonal violence (sexual assault, abuse, intimate partner violence); death investigation; legal and ethical issues; forensic mental health nursing; correctional nursing; and emergency and trauma nursing.
期刊最新文献
Professional Quality of Life and Turnover Intention in Forensic Nurse Program Coordinators: Implications to Forensic Nurse Workforce Development. The Purpose, Process, and Advancement of Forensic Nursing Standards. Unintended Consequences: A Case Study of a Toddler's Accidental Burn Injury Caused by a Hair Crimper. Romantic Love and Its Link With Gender-Based Violence. Sexual Violence in Virtual Reality: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1