Assessing training needs in health research ethics: a case study from the University of Zambia School of Medicine.

Q1 Arts and Humanities Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2020-12-02 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2020.1853001
Gershom Chongwe, Bornwell Sikateyo, Linda Kampata, Joseph Ali, Kristina Hallez, Adnan A Hyder, Nancy Kass, Charles Michelo
{"title":"Assessing training needs in health research ethics: a case study from the University of Zambia School of Medicine.","authors":"Gershom Chongwe, Bornwell Sikateyo, Linda Kampata, Joseph Ali, Kristina Hallez, Adnan A Hyder, Nancy Kass, Charles Michelo","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2020.1853001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many settings, and perhaps especially in low-middle income countries, training institutions do not adequately prepare their students for the ethical challenges that confront them in professional life. We conducted a survey to assess the training needs in research ethics among the faculty at the University of Zambia, School of Medicine (UNZASoM) using a structured questionnaire distributed to faculty members in January 2015. The study was approved by the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee. Seventy-five faculty members of various ranks completed the questionnaire. It was found that 31% of the faculty had not received any research ethics training. Of those who had received training, most of them had received it through short workshops of five days or less (57.4%, <i>n</i> = 31), while only 27.7% received ethics training as a component of an academic degree and 22.2% obtained it through electronic web-based courses. While most faculty (70.7%) reported being well-prepared to guide their students in developing a research methods section of a research protocol, only 25.3% felt they were well-prepared to guide on ethical considerations. This study has demonstrated gaps in research ethics training among faculty members at UNZASoM. Mandatory instruction in research ethics among faculty and students is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"31 1","pages":"155-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2020.1853001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many settings, and perhaps especially in low-middle income countries, training institutions do not adequately prepare their students for the ethical challenges that confront them in professional life. We conducted a survey to assess the training needs in research ethics among the faculty at the University of Zambia, School of Medicine (UNZASoM) using a structured questionnaire distributed to faculty members in January 2015. The study was approved by the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee. Seventy-five faculty members of various ranks completed the questionnaire. It was found that 31% of the faculty had not received any research ethics training. Of those who had received training, most of them had received it through short workshops of five days or less (57.4%, n = 31), while only 27.7% received ethics training as a component of an academic degree and 22.2% obtained it through electronic web-based courses. While most faculty (70.7%) reported being well-prepared to guide their students in developing a research methods section of a research protocol, only 25.3% felt they were well-prepared to guide on ethical considerations. This study has demonstrated gaps in research ethics training among faculty members at UNZASoM. Mandatory instruction in research ethics among faculty and students is recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估健康研究伦理方面的培训需求:赞比亚大学医学院的案例研究。
在许多环境中,尤其是在中低收入国家,培训机构没有为学生在职业生活中面临的伦理挑战做好充分准备。我们于 2015 年 1 月向赞比亚大学医学院(UNZASoM)的教师发放了一份结构化问卷,对他们在研究伦理方面的培训需求进行了一次调查评估。该研究获得了赞比亚大学生物医学研究伦理委员会的批准。75名不同职级的教职员工填写了问卷。结果发现,31%的教职员工没有接受过任何研究伦理培训。在接受过培训的人中,大多数人是通过为期五天或更短时间的短期讲习班接受培训的(57.4%,n = 31),只有 27.7% 的人接受过作为学术学位组成部分的伦理培训,22.2% 的人通过电子网络课程接受培训。虽然大多数教师(70.7%)表示已做好充分准备,可以指导学生制定研究方案中的研究方法部分,但只有 25.3% 的教师认为他们已做好充分准备,可以指导学生考虑伦理问题。这项研究表明,联合国扎伊尔萨斯大学的教师在研究伦理培训方面存在差距。建议对教师和学生进行强制性的研究伦理培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can biosampling really be "non-invasive"? An examination of the socially invasive nature of physically non-invasive biosampling in urban and rural Malawi. The expressivist argument for recent policy changes regarding the provision of prenatal testing in Japan. A youth advisory group on health and health research in rural Cambodia. May Artificial Intelligence take health and sustainability on a honeymoon? Towards green technologies for multidimensional health and environmental justice. Broad consent for biobank research in South Africa - Towards an enabling ethico-legal framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1