Evaluation of High-dose versus Standard-dose of Dexamethasone on Mortality among the Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current drug safety Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1574886318666230817102043
Pramodini B Kale-Pradhan, Regina Pacitto, Christopher A Giuliano, Leonard B Johnson
{"title":"Evaluation of High-dose <i>versus</i> Standard-dose of Dexamethasone on Mortality among the Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Pramodini B Kale-Pradhan, Regina Pacitto, Christopher A Giuliano, Leonard B Johnson","doi":"10.2174/1574886318666230817102043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-inflammatory agents like dexamethasone (DEX) are a mainstay of treatment for COVID-19. Despite randomized trials demonstrating that a 6 mg daily dose of DEX improved patient outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving oxygen, clinicians often prescribe higher doses of corticosteroids without evidence to support this practice. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of ventilated COVID-19 patients who received standard dose (SD) versus high dose (HD) DEX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multi-site, retrospective, observational study on ventilated COVID-19- positive patients who received DEX for at least three days between June 1, 2020, and January 31, 2022. The primary outcome of this study was the association between mortality and SD (<6 mg daily) versus HD (>10 mg daily) DEX in ventilated COVID-19 patients. Secondary outcomes included average blood glucose (BG), number of BG readings above 200, incidence of bacterial nosocomial infection, ventilator-free days, length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 212 included patients, 53 (25%) received SD DEX, and 159 (75%) received HD DEX. There was no significant effect of DEX dose on mortality, number of BG readings >200, incidence of nosocomial infections, LOS, or ventilator-free days (p >0.05). After controlling for confounding factors, no difference in mortality persisted (OR 1.34 95% CI 0.62- 2.90). Average daily BG and ICU LOS were significantly greater in the HD group compared to the SD group (p = 0.003, p = 0.019, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no association between HD DEX and mortality among ventilated COVID- 19 patients compared to SD DEX. Moreover, HD DEX is associated with detrimental effects such as prolonged ICU LOS and higher average daily BG. This study supports the use of SD DEX in ventilated COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886318666230817102043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anti-inflammatory agents like dexamethasone (DEX) are a mainstay of treatment for COVID-19. Despite randomized trials demonstrating that a 6 mg daily dose of DEX improved patient outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving oxygen, clinicians often prescribe higher doses of corticosteroids without evidence to support this practice. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of ventilated COVID-19 patients who received standard dose (SD) versus high dose (HD) DEX.

Methods: This was a multi-site, retrospective, observational study on ventilated COVID-19- positive patients who received DEX for at least three days between June 1, 2020, and January 31, 2022. The primary outcome of this study was the association between mortality and SD (<6 mg daily) versus HD (>10 mg daily) DEX in ventilated COVID-19 patients. Secondary outcomes included average blood glucose (BG), number of BG readings above 200, incidence of bacterial nosocomial infection, ventilator-free days, length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS.

Results: Of the 212 included patients, 53 (25%) received SD DEX, and 159 (75%) received HD DEX. There was no significant effect of DEX dose on mortality, number of BG readings >200, incidence of nosocomial infections, LOS, or ventilator-free days (p >0.05). After controlling for confounding factors, no difference in mortality persisted (OR 1.34 95% CI 0.62- 2.90). Average daily BG and ICU LOS were significantly greater in the HD group compared to the SD group (p = 0.003, p = 0.019, respectively).

Conclusion: There was no association between HD DEX and mortality among ventilated COVID- 19 patients compared to SD DEX. Moreover, HD DEX is associated with detrimental effects such as prolonged ICU LOS and higher average daily BG. This study supports the use of SD DEX in ventilated COVID-19 patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估大剂量与标准剂量地塞米松对机械通气 COVID-19 患者死亡率的影响
导言:地塞米松(DEX)等抗炎药物是治疗 COVID-19 的主要药物。尽管随机试验表明,每日 6 毫克剂量的 DEX 可改善接受吸氧治疗的 COVID-19 住院患者的预后,但临床医生仍经常在没有证据支持的情况下开具更大剂量的皮质类固醇处方。本研究旨在比较接受标准剂量(SD)和高剂量(HD)DEX治疗的COVID-19通气患者的疗效:这是一项多站点、回顾性、观察性研究,研究对象为 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 31 日期间接受 DEX 至少三天的 COVID-19 阳性通风患者。本研究的主要结果是 COVID-19 通气患者的死亡率与 SD(每天 10 毫克)DEX 之间的关系。次要结果包括平均血糖 (BG)、BG 读数超过 200 的次数、细菌性院内感染的发生率、无呼吸机天数、住院时间 (LOS) 和 ICU LOS:在纳入的 212 例患者中,53 例(25%)接受了 SD DEX,159 例(75%)接受了 HD DEX。DEX剂量对死亡率、BG读数大于200的次数、院内感染发生率、LOS或无呼吸机天数无明显影响(P>0.05)。控制混杂因素后,死亡率仍无差异(OR 1.34 95% CI 0.62-2.90)。与标清组相比,高清组的日平均血糖和ICU LOS明显更高(分别为p = 0.003和p = 0.019):结论:与标清DEX相比,COVID- 19通气患者中的高清DEX与死亡率之间没有关联。结论:与 SD DEX 相比,HD DEX 与 COVID- 19 通气患者的死亡率无关。本研究支持在 COVID-19 通气患者中使用 SD DEX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current drug safety
Current drug safety PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.
期刊最新文献
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome with Multiple Drugs (Leflunomide and Cefuroxime): A Case Report. Possible Terbinafine and/or Itraconazole Induced Vasculitis - A Case Study. Long-term Safety Monitoring and Efficacy Status of Infliximab and its Biosimilars in Psoriasis Management. Parsonage-Turner Syndrome Following AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccination. Ciprofloxacin's Structure Causing Fluoride-Related Toxicity: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1