Preferred Language Mediates Association Between Race, Ethnicity, and Delayed Presentation in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.

Michael S Kelly, Adna Mohammed, Daniel Okin, George A Alba, Sirus J Jesudasen, Shelby Flanagan, Nupur A Dandawate, Alexander Gavralidis, Leslie L Chang, Emily E Moin, Alison S Witkin, Kathryn A Hibbert, Aran Kadar, Patrick L Gordan, Lisa M Bebell, Marissa Hauptman, Linda Valeri, Peggy S Lai
{"title":"Preferred Language Mediates Association Between Race, Ethnicity, and Delayed Presentation in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.","authors":"Michael S Kelly,&nbsp;Adna Mohammed,&nbsp;Daniel Okin,&nbsp;George A Alba,&nbsp;Sirus J Jesudasen,&nbsp;Shelby Flanagan,&nbsp;Nupur A Dandawate,&nbsp;Alexander Gavralidis,&nbsp;Leslie L Chang,&nbsp;Emily E Moin,&nbsp;Alison S Witkin,&nbsp;Kathryn A Hibbert,&nbsp;Aran Kadar,&nbsp;Patrick L Gordan,&nbsp;Lisa M Bebell,&nbsp;Marissa Hauptman,&nbsp;Linda Valeri,&nbsp;Peggy S Lai","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Which social factors explain racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 access to care and outcomes remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that preferred language mediates the association between race, ethnicity and delays to care.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults with COVID-19 consecutively admitted to the ICU in three Massachusetts hospitals in 2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Causal mediation analysis was performed to evaluate potential mediators including preferred language, insurance status, and neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (157/442, 36%) were more likely to speak English as their preferred language (78% vs. 13%), were less likely to be un- or under-insured (1% vs. 28%), lived in neighborhoods with lower social vulnerability index (SVI) than patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (SVI percentile 59 [28] vs. 74 [21]) but had more comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index 4.6 [2.5] vs. 3.0 [2.5]), and were older (70 [13.2] vs. 58 [15.1] years). From symptom onset, NHW patients were admitted 1.67 [0.71-2.63] days earlier than patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Non-English preferred language was associated with delay to admission of 1.29 [0.40-2.18] days (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Preferred language mediated 63% of the total effect (<i>p</i> = 0.02) between race, ethnicity and days from symptom onset to hospital admission. Insurance status, social vulnerability, and distance to the hospital were not on the causal pathway between race, ethnicity and delay to admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Preferred language mediates the association between race, ethnicity and delays to presentation for critically ill patients with COVID-19, although our results are limited by possible collider stratification bias. Effective COVID-19 treatments require early diagnosis, and delays are associated with increased mortality. Further research on the role preferred language plays in racial and ethnic disparities may identify effective solutions for equitable care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/32/cc9-5-e0927.PMC10270487.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Which social factors explain racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 access to care and outcomes remain unclear.

Objectives: We hypothesized that preferred language mediates the association between race, ethnicity and delays to care.

Design setting and participants: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults with COVID-19 consecutively admitted to the ICU in three Massachusetts hospitals in 2020.

Main outcome and measures: Causal mediation analysis was performed to evaluate potential mediators including preferred language, insurance status, and neighborhood characteristics.

Results: Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (157/442, 36%) were more likely to speak English as their preferred language (78% vs. 13%), were less likely to be un- or under-insured (1% vs. 28%), lived in neighborhoods with lower social vulnerability index (SVI) than patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (SVI percentile 59 [28] vs. 74 [21]) but had more comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index 4.6 [2.5] vs. 3.0 [2.5]), and were older (70 [13.2] vs. 58 [15.1] years). From symptom onset, NHW patients were admitted 1.67 [0.71-2.63] days earlier than patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (p < 0.01). Non-English preferred language was associated with delay to admission of 1.29 [0.40-2.18] days (p < 0.01). Preferred language mediated 63% of the total effect (p = 0.02) between race, ethnicity and days from symptom onset to hospital admission. Insurance status, social vulnerability, and distance to the hospital were not on the causal pathway between race, ethnicity and delay to admission.

Conclusions and relevance: Preferred language mediates the association between race, ethnicity and delays to presentation for critically ill patients with COVID-19, although our results are limited by possible collider stratification bias. Effective COVID-19 treatments require early diagnosis, and delays are associated with increased mortality. Further research on the role preferred language plays in racial and ethnic disparities may identify effective solutions for equitable care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首选语言介导COVID-19危重患者的种族、民族和延迟表现之间的关联
哪些社会因素解释了COVID-19在获得护理和结果方面的种族和民族差异尚不清楚。目的:我们假设语言偏好在种族、民族和护理延迟之间起中介作用。设计环境和参与者:对2020年连续入住马萨诸塞州三家医院ICU的成人COVID-19患者进行多中心回顾性队列研究。主要结果和措施:进行因果中介分析,评估潜在的中介因素,包括首选语言、保险状况和社区特征。结果:非西班牙裔白人(NHW)患者(157/442,36%)更有可能将英语作为首选语言(78%对13%),不投保或保险不足的可能性更小(1%对28%),生活在社会脆弱指数(SVI百分位数59[28]对74[21])较低的社区,但有更多的合并症(Charlson合并症指数4.6[2.5]对3.0[2.5]),年龄较大(70[13.2]对58[15.1]岁)。从症状出现时间来看,NHW患者比少数民族患者早入院1.67[0.71 ~ 2.63]天(p < 0.01)。非英语首选语言与延迟入院时间1.29[0.40-2.18]天相关(p < 0.01)。在种族、民族和从症状出现到住院的天数之间,首选语言介导了总效应的63% (p = 0.02)。保险状况、社会脆弱性和到医院的距离不属于种族、族裔和延迟入院之间的因果关系。结论和相关性:尽管我们的结果受到可能的碰撞分层偏倚的限制,但首选语言介导了COVID-19危重患者的种族、民族和就诊延迟之间的关联。有效的COVID-19治疗需要早期诊断,延误与死亡率增加有关。进一步研究首选语言在种族和民族差异中所起的作用,可能会找到公平护理的有效解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1