The effect of early conversion from central venous catheter to arteriovenous fistula on hospitalization and mortality in incident haemodialysis patients.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1177/11297298231196267
Wenyuan Gan, Fan Zhu, Huihui Mao, Wei Xiao, Wenli Chen, Xingruo Zeng
{"title":"The effect of early conversion from central venous catheter to arteriovenous fistula on hospitalization and mortality in incident haemodialysis patients.","authors":"Wenyuan Gan, Fan Zhu, Huihui Mao, Wei Xiao, Wenli Chen, Xingruo Zeng","doi":"10.1177/11297298231196267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controversy remains as to whether initiating haemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC) and vascular access conversion are associated with the risk of morbidity and mortality in incident HD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our dialysis centre, the vascular access strategy is to create an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) early and use the AVF to initiate HD. In emergency situations, HD is initiated with a CVC and subsequent conversion from a CVC to an AVF as soon as possible. The effects of early AVF conversion on hospitalization and mortality were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At HD initiation, 35.42% used AVF, 15.63% used CVC with immature AVF and 48.96% used CVC, and all patients were able to convert from CVC to AVF within approximately 3 months. Compared to starting HD using an AVF, using a CVC was associated with access-related hospitalizations at 2 years, regardless of whether an AVF was created before (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 3.02, 95% CI 0.89-10.24, <i>p</i> = 0.03) or after (IRR = 4.10, 95% CI 1.55-10.85, <i>p</i> < 0.01) HD initiation. The Kaplan-Meier method showed that the 2-year survival probability was not statistically significant between the three groups (log-rank χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.165, <i>p</i> = 0.921). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that starting HD with a CVC was not associated with mortality at 2 years (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort, initiating HD with a CVC was associated with more access-related hospitalizations. Under the impact of an early AVF conversion strategy, despite initiating HD with a CVC, subsequent conversion from a CVC to an AVF within approximately 3 months had no impact on all-cause mortality in incident HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1967-1974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231196267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Controversy remains as to whether initiating haemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC) and vascular access conversion are associated with the risk of morbidity and mortality in incident HD patients.

Methods: At our dialysis centre, the vascular access strategy is to create an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) early and use the AVF to initiate HD. In emergency situations, HD is initiated with a CVC and subsequent conversion from a CVC to an AVF as soon as possible. The effects of early AVF conversion on hospitalization and mortality were analysed.

Results: At HD initiation, 35.42% used AVF, 15.63% used CVC with immature AVF and 48.96% used CVC, and all patients were able to convert from CVC to AVF within approximately 3 months. Compared to starting HD using an AVF, using a CVC was associated with access-related hospitalizations at 2 years, regardless of whether an AVF was created before (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 3.02, 95% CI 0.89-10.24, p = 0.03) or after (IRR = 4.10, 95% CI 1.55-10.85, p < 0.01) HD initiation. The Kaplan-Meier method showed that the 2-year survival probability was not statistically significant between the three groups (log-rank χ2 = 0.165, p = 0.921). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that starting HD with a CVC was not associated with mortality at 2 years (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: In this cohort, initiating HD with a CVC was associated with more access-related hospitalizations. Under the impact of an early AVF conversion strategy, despite initiating HD with a CVC, subsequent conversion from a CVC to an AVF within approximately 3 months had no impact on all-cause mortality in incident HD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期将中心静脉导管转换为动静脉内瘘对血液透析患者住院时间和死亡率的影响。
背景:使用中心静脉导管(CVC)启动血液透析(HD)和血管通路转换是否与血液透析患者的发病率和死亡率相关,目前仍存在争议:在我们的透析中心,血管通路策略是尽早建立动静脉瘘(AVF),并利用动静脉瘘启动血液透析。在紧急情况下,使用 CVC 启动 HD,然后尽快从 CVC 转换为 AVF。结果分析了早期 AVF 转换对住院时间和死亡率的影响:开始使用 HD 时,35.42% 的患者使用 AVF,15.63% 的患者使用带有不成熟 AVF 的 CVC,48.96% 的患者使用 CVC,所有患者都能在大约 3 个月内从 CVC 转换为 AVF。与使用 AVF 开始 HD 相比,无论 AVF 是在创建之前(发病率比 (IRR) = 3.02,95% CI 0.89-10.24,p = 0.03)还是之后(发病率比 (IRR) = 4.10,95% CI 1.55-10.85,p 2 = 0.165,p = 0.921)创建的,使用 CVC 都与 2 年后的入院相关。多变量考克斯比例危险回归显示,开始使用 CVC 进行 HD 治疗与 2 年后的死亡率无关(P > 0.05):结论:在这一队列中,使用 CVC 开始 HD 与更多与接入相关的住院治疗有关。在早期动静脉瘘转换策略的影响下,尽管开始使用 CVC 进行 HD,但随后在约 3 个月内从 CVC 转换为动静脉瘘对 HD 患者的全因死亡率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Centrally inserted central catheter placement using a novel, handheld, image-guided, robotic device: Results of initial feasibility trial in patients. Establishing an advanced nursing vascular access programme in a children's hospital: A successful journey. Retraction: Novel electrospun polyurethane grafts for vascular access in rats. Feasibility and Safety of bedside placement of tunneled dialysis catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Retained foreign body in radial artery: Endovascular retrieval and salvage of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1