Radiological Study of Atlas Arch Defects with Meta-Analysis and a Proposed New Classification.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.31616/asj.2023.0030
Worawit Suphamungmee, Laphatrada Yurasakpong, Kanchanaphan Poonudom, R Shane Tubbs, Joe Iwanaga, Nutmethee Kruepunga, Arada Chaiyamoon, Athikhun Suwannakhan
{"title":"Radiological Study of Atlas Arch Defects with Meta-Analysis and a Proposed New Classification.","authors":"Worawit Suphamungmee,&nbsp;Laphatrada Yurasakpong,&nbsp;Kanchanaphan Poonudom,&nbsp;R Shane Tubbs,&nbsp;Joe Iwanaga,&nbsp;Nutmethee Kruepunga,&nbsp;Arada Chaiyamoon,&nbsp;Athikhun Suwannakhan","doi":"10.31616/asj.2023.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study consists of a retrospective cohort study, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis which were separately conducted. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of atlas arch defects, generate an evidence-based synthesis, and propose a common classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. Atlas arch defects are well-corticated gaps in the anterior or posterior arch of the atlas. When both arches are involved, it is known as a combined arch defect. Awareness of these defects is essential for avoiding complications during surgical procedures on the upper spine. The prevalence of arch defects was investigated in an open-access OPC-Radiomics (Radiomic Biomarkers in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma) dataset comprising 606 head and neck computed tomography scans from oropharyngeal cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to generate prevalence estimates of atlas arch defects and propose a classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. The posterior arch defect was found in 20 patients (3.3%) out of the 606 patients investigated. The anterior arch defect was not observed in any patient, while a combined arch defect was observed in one patient (0.2%). A meta-analysis of 13,539 participants from 14 studies, including the present study, yielded a pooled-posterior arch defect prevalence of 2.07% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22%-2.92%). The prevalences of anterior and combined arch defects were 0.00% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.10%) and 0.14% (95% CI, 0.04%-0.25%), respectively. The anterior and combined arch defects were classified into five subtypes based on their morphology and frequency. The present study showed that atlas arch defects were present in approximately 2% of the general population. For future studies, larger sample sizes should be used for studying arch defects to avoid the small-study effect and to predict the prevalence accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2023.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study consists of a retrospective cohort study, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis which were separately conducted. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of atlas arch defects, generate an evidence-based synthesis, and propose a common classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. Atlas arch defects are well-corticated gaps in the anterior or posterior arch of the atlas. When both arches are involved, it is known as a combined arch defect. Awareness of these defects is essential for avoiding complications during surgical procedures on the upper spine. The prevalence of arch defects was investigated in an open-access OPC-Radiomics (Radiomic Biomarkers in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma) dataset comprising 606 head and neck computed tomography scans from oropharyngeal cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to generate prevalence estimates of atlas arch defects and propose a classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. The posterior arch defect was found in 20 patients (3.3%) out of the 606 patients investigated. The anterior arch defect was not observed in any patient, while a combined arch defect was observed in one patient (0.2%). A meta-analysis of 13,539 participants from 14 studies, including the present study, yielded a pooled-posterior arch defect prevalence of 2.07% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22%-2.92%). The prevalences of anterior and combined arch defects were 0.00% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.10%) and 0.14% (95% CI, 0.04%-0.25%), respectively. The anterior and combined arch defects were classified into five subtypes based on their morphology and frequency. The present study showed that atlas arch defects were present in approximately 2% of the general population. For future studies, larger sample sizes should be used for studying arch defects to avoid the small-study effect and to predict the prevalence accurately.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Atlas拱形缺陷的Meta分析放射学研究及新分类建议。
本研究包括一项回顾性队列研究、一项系统综述和一项荟萃分析,分别进行。本研究旨在调查寰椎弓缺损的患病率,生成一个循证综合,并提出一个常见的寰椎弓前部和合并缺损的分类系统。寰椎弓缺损是指寰椎弓前部或后部皮质良好的间隙。当涉及两个足弓时,称为组合足弓缺陷。意识到这些缺陷对于避免上脊柱手术过程中的并发症至关重要。在开放式OPC-Radiomics(口咽癌中的放射性生物标志物)数据集中研究了足弓缺陷的患病率,该数据集包括来自口咽癌症患者的606个头部和颈部计算机断层扫描。进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以生成寰椎弓缺陷的患病率估计值,并提出了前部和合并寰椎弓缺损的分类系统。在调查的606名患者中,有20名患者(3.3%)发现了后足弓缺损。在任何患者中均未观察到前足弓缺损,而在一名患者中观察到合并足弓缺损(0.2%)。对包括本研究在内的14项研究的13539名参与者进行的荟萃分析显示,合并后足弓缺损发生率为2.07%(95%置信区间[CI],1.22%-2.92%)。前足弓和合并足弓缺损的发生率分别为0.00%(95%CI,0.00%-0.10%)和0.14%(95%可信区间,0.04%-0.25%)。根据其形态和频率,将前部和合并足弓缺损分为五种亚型。目前的研究表明,大约2%的普通人群存在寰椎弓缺损。对于未来的研究,应使用较大的样本量来研究足弓缺陷,以避免研究效果较小,并准确预测患病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A novel technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion to obtain a good local lordosis angle: anterior-release posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Adjacent segment degeneration at a minimum 2-year follow-up after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: the impact of sagittal spinal proportion: a retrospective case series. Patient-specific mechanical analysis of pedicle screw insertion in simulated osteoporotic spinal bone models derived from medical images. A machine learning-based approach for individualized prediction of short-term outcomes after anterior cervical corpectomy. Exploring the atlantic part of the vertebral artery in the South Indian population and its implications in spine surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1