Pharyngeal airway dimensions in Iranian female young adults with different skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_161_21
Amin Golshah, Tanaz Hosseini Jalilian, Nafiseh Nikkerdar
{"title":"Pharyngeal airway dimensions in Iranian female young adults with different skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.","authors":"Amin Golshah,&nbsp;Tanaz Hosseini Jalilian,&nbsp;Nafiseh Nikkerdar","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_161_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the oropharyngeal airway in Iranian female young adults with different skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This descriptive, cross-sectional study evaluated 105 CBCT scans of female patients between 18 and 35 years retrieved from the archives of a radiology clinic. The images were evaluated in axial, sagittal, and frontal sections. In the axial plane, the maximum and minimum cross-sectional area (CSA) of the airways at the oropharynx, minimum width (anteroposteriorly), and minimum depth (laterally) were measured using Mimics Medical software. The oropharyngeal volume was measured by NemoFAB software. The values were compared among the groups with different sagittal, vertical, and transverse patterns. The correlation of indices with airway measurements was analyzed using Monte Carlo Chi-square and Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was noted in oropharyngeal airway dimensions and volume among cases with different skeletal sagittal, vertical, and transverse patterns (<i>P</i> > 0.05) except for class III patients with normal transverse pattern in whom maximum CSA in low-angle group was larger than that in normal-angle group (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and class I normal-angle patients in whom maximum CSA in transverse normal group was smaller than that in constriction group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oropharyngeal dimensions were not significantly different in Iranian female young adults with different skeletal patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/6f/JOS-12-4.PMC10282510.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_161_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the oropharyngeal airway in Iranian female young adults with different skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study evaluated 105 CBCT scans of female patients between 18 and 35 years retrieved from the archives of a radiology clinic. The images were evaluated in axial, sagittal, and frontal sections. In the axial plane, the maximum and minimum cross-sectional area (CSA) of the airways at the oropharynx, minimum width (anteroposteriorly), and minimum depth (laterally) were measured using Mimics Medical software. The oropharyngeal volume was measured by NemoFAB software. The values were compared among the groups with different sagittal, vertical, and transverse patterns. The correlation of indices with airway measurements was analyzed using Monte Carlo Chi-square and Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: No significant difference was noted in oropharyngeal airway dimensions and volume among cases with different skeletal sagittal, vertical, and transverse patterns (P > 0.05) except for class III patients with normal transverse pattern in whom maximum CSA in low-angle group was larger than that in normal-angle group (P < 0.05) and class I normal-angle patients in whom maximum CSA in transverse normal group was smaller than that in constriction group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Oropharyngeal dimensions were not significantly different in Iranian female young adults with different skeletal patterns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对不同骨骼模式的伊朗年轻女性咽气道尺寸的研究。
目的:利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估不同骨骼类型的伊朗年轻女性口咽气道。材料和方法:本描述性横断面研究评估了105例18 - 35岁女性患者的CBCT扫描,这些患者均来自一家放射学诊所的档案。图像在轴位、矢状位和额位进行评估。在轴向平面上,使用Mimics Medical软件测量口咽处气道的最大和最小横截面积(CSA)、最小宽度(正反向)和最小深度(横向)。用NemoFAB软件测量口咽容积。比较矢状、纵、横三种不同形态组间的数值。采用蒙特卡罗卡方和皮尔逊相关系数分析各指标与气道测量的相关性。结果:不同骨骼矢状、垂直、横型患者口咽气道尺寸、容积差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但横型正常的III类患者低角组最大CSA大于正角组(P < 0.05),横角正常的I类患者最大CSA小于缩窄组(P < 0.05)。结论:不同骨骼类型的伊朗年轻女性口咽尺寸无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the characteristics of the mandibular canal in cone beam CT. Orthodontic practice marketing: The orthodontist and laypeople's perspective. Role of physical and dentofacial features in bullying among United Arab Emirates schoolchildren and its impact on school performance - A cross-sectional study. Quantitative assessment of orthodontic treatments performed by graduate orthodontic students of an International School of Dentistry. Skeletal and dental effects of skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant devices during class II malocclusion treatment: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1