The value of discharged case fatality rate in estimating the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19 in China: a novel epidemiological study.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1007/s10389-023-01895-4
Kexuan Cheng, Zhifeng Guo, Mengqing Yan, Yahui Fan, Xiaohua Liu, Yongli Yang, Fuxiao Gao, Fangli Xie, Peizhong Peter Wang, Wu Yao, Qi Wang, Wei Wang
{"title":"The value of discharged case fatality rate in estimating the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19 in China: a novel epidemiological study.","authors":"Kexuan Cheng,&nbsp;Zhifeng Guo,&nbsp;Mengqing Yan,&nbsp;Yahui Fan,&nbsp;Xiaohua Liu,&nbsp;Yongli Yang,&nbsp;Fuxiao Gao,&nbsp;Fangli Xie,&nbsp;Peizhong Peter Wang,&nbsp;Wu Yao,&nbsp;Qi Wang,&nbsp;Wei Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10389-023-01895-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main objective of this study was to explore the value of the discharged case fatality rate (DCFR) in estimating the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19 in China.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Epidemiological data on COVID-19 in China and Hubei Province were obtained from the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China from January 20, 2020, to March 31, 2020. The number of daily new confirmed cases, daily confirmed deaths, daily recovered cases, the proportion of daily deaths and total deaths of discharged cases were collected, and the total discharge case fatality rate (tDCFR), daily discharge case fatality rate (dDCFR), and stage-discharge case fatality rate (sDCFR) were calculated. We used the R software (version 3.6.3, R core team) to apply a trimmed exact linear time method to search for changes in the mean and variance of dDCFR in order to estimate the pandemic phase from dDCFR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tDCFR of COVID-19 in China was 4.16% until March 31, 2020. According to the pattern of dDCFR, the pandemic was divided into four phases: the transmission phase (from January 20 to February 2), the epidemic phase (from February 3 to February 14), the decline phase (from February 15 to February 22), and the sporadic phase (from February 23 to March 31). The sDCFR for these four phases was 43.18% (CI 39.82-46.54%), 13.23% (CI 12.52-13.94%), 5.86% (CI 5.49-6.22%), and 1.61% (CI 1.50-1.72%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCFR has great value in assessing the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01895-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":29967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01895-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The main objective of this study was to explore the value of the discharged case fatality rate (DCFR) in estimating the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19 in China.

Subjects and methods: Epidemiological data on COVID-19 in China and Hubei Province were obtained from the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China from January 20, 2020, to March 31, 2020. The number of daily new confirmed cases, daily confirmed deaths, daily recovered cases, the proportion of daily deaths and total deaths of discharged cases were collected, and the total discharge case fatality rate (tDCFR), daily discharge case fatality rate (dDCFR), and stage-discharge case fatality rate (sDCFR) were calculated. We used the R software (version 3.6.3, R core team) to apply a trimmed exact linear time method to search for changes in the mean and variance of dDCFR in order to estimate the pandemic phase from dDCFR.

Results: The tDCFR of COVID-19 in China was 4.16% until March 31, 2020. According to the pattern of dDCFR, the pandemic was divided into four phases: the transmission phase (from January 20 to February 2), the epidemic phase (from February 3 to February 14), the decline phase (from February 15 to February 22), and the sporadic phase (from February 23 to March 31). The sDCFR for these four phases was 43.18% (CI 39.82-46.54%), 13.23% (CI 12.52-13.94%), 5.86% (CI 5.49-6.22%), and 1.61% (CI 1.50-1.72%), respectively.

Conclusion: DCFR has great value in assessing the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01895-4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出院病死率在估计中国新冠肺炎严重程度和流行趋势中的价值:一项新的流行病学研究。
目的:探讨出院病死率(DCFR)在估计新冠肺炎疫情严重程度和流行趋势中的价值。研究对象和方法:从中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会获得2020年1月20日至2020年3月31日中国和湖北省新冠肺炎流行病学数据。收集每日新增确诊病例数、每日确诊死亡人数、每日康复病例数、出院病例每日死亡人数占总死亡人数的比例,计算总出院病死率(tDCFR)、每日出院病死率和分期出院病死率。我们使用R软件(版本3.6.3,R核心团队)应用修剪精确线性时间方法来搜索dDCFR的平均值和方差的变化,以根据dDCFR估计大流行阶段。结果:截至2020年3月31日,中国新冠肺炎的tDCFR为4.16%。根据dDCFR的模式,疫情分为四个阶段:传播阶段(1月20日至2月2日)、流行阶段(2月3日至2日14日)、下降阶段(2月份15日至2月份22日)和散发期(2月23日至3月31日)。这四个阶段的sDCFR分别为43.18%(CI 39.82-46.54%)、13.23%(CI 12.52-13.94%)、5.86%(CI 5.49-6.22%)和1.61%(CI 1.50-1.72%)。结论:DCFR在评估COVID-19的严重程度和流行趋势方面具有重要价值。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,请访问10.1007/s10389-023-01895-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between life satisfaction, personal health, quality of life, and medication adherence among adolescents living with HIV in southwestern Uganda. Self-reported health among immigrants in Luxembourg: insights from a nationally representative sample. Levelling Up for health in towns? Development of a new deprivation index: the 'Stronger Towns Index' and its association with self-rated health and migration in England, between 2001 and 2011. Social networks and health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among older adults in the Netherlands. Racial disparities in lifestyle habits and dietary patterns in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1